SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Tourism Potential of Ulaanbaatar: Perceptions of the Local Residents and the Tourism Representatives

Ankhbayar KHURELDEE
Kevser ÇINAR
Pages
609–637
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In contrast, the negative effects are determined as tourism increases the service prices and weakens the local people's affordability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to determine how tourism affects Ulaanbaatar, which is the capital of Mongolia in terms of economic and socio-cultural aspects and to explain the tourism potential in the city through its infrastructure and superstructure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data was collected through a 5-point Likert-type scale from local people and sector representatives in Ulaanbaatar between September 2019 and March 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In contrast, the negative effects are determined as tourism increases the service prices and weakens the local people's affordability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The purpose of this research is to determine how tourism affects Ulaanbaatar, which is the capital of Mongolia in terms of economic and socio-cultural aspects and to explain the tourism potential in the city through its infrastructure and superstructure. It is also aimed to reveal how local people and sector representatives in Ulaanbaatar perceive the effects of tourism and whether their views on tourism change according to their demographic characteristics. The data was collected through a 5-point Likert-type scale from local people and sector representatives in Ulaanbaatar between September 2019 and March 2020. According to the study, some of the positive impacts of tourism on Ulaanbaatar are determined as tourism contributes to the city's economy, increases employment, protects natural and historical assets. In contrast, the negative effects are determined as tourism increases the service prices and weakens the local people's affordability.

🔖

Cite This Article

KHURELDEE, A., ÇINAR, K. (2021). Tourism Potential of Ulaanbaatar: Perceptions of the Local Residents and the Tourism Representatives. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 609–637. https://ajindex.com/articles/347657

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abdelgadir, F. A. A., Halis, M., & Halis, M. (2017). Tourism stakeholders attitudes toward sustainable developments: Empirical research from Shahat city. Ottoman Journal of Tourism and Management Research, 2(3), 182–200.
  2. Adongo, C., Taale, F., & Adam, I. (2018). Tourists’ values and emphatic attitude toward sustainable tourism development in tourism. Ecological Economics, 150, 251–263.
  3. Akgün, A. (2016). Giresun ilinin turizm potansiyelinin belirlenmesi, yerel halk ve sektör temsilcilerinin algısı üzerine bir araştırma (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi,
  4. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Nevşehir. Akis, S., Peristianis, N., & Warner, J. (1996). Residents’ attitudes to tourism development: The case of Cyprus. Tourism Management, 17, 481–494.
  5. Aktymbayeva, B., Koshkimbayeva, U., Abisheva, Z., Tokbergenova, U., & Tumazhanova, M. (2020). Tourism industry development and governance: A comparative stage review of Kazakhstan’s experience for the years of independence, 1991-2020. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 34(1), 69–76.
  6. Albu, R. (2020). Study on the effects of tourism development on the local community of Brasov. Series V – Economic Sciences, 12 (2), 37–42.
  7. Altundaş, Y. (2013). Akçakoca ilçesinin turizm potansiyelinin değerlendirilmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Düzce Üniversitesi,
  8. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Düzce Alrwajfah, M. M., Almeida-Garcia, F., & Cortes-Macias, R., et al. (2019). International aid to tourism planning and stakeholder participation in the Petra region. Cogent Social Sciences 5(1), 1616362. Armenski, T., Dwyer, L., & Pavluković, V. (2018). Destination competitiveness: Public and private sector tourism management in Serbia. Journal of Travel Research, 57(3), 384-398.
  9. Ap, J. (1992). Residents’ perceptions on tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(4), 665–690.
  10. Assaf, A. G., & Josiassen, A. (2012). Identifying and ranking the determinants of tourism performance: A global investigation. Journal of Travel Research, 51(4), 388-399.
  11. Batbold, S. (2018).
  12. Ulaanbaator the city of happiness, Time Journal, (1), 60-68.
  13. Bhat, A., & Mishra, R. (2020). Demographic characteristics and residents' attitude towards tourism development: A case of Kashmir region. Journal of Public Affairs. 1-13
  14. Bello, F. G., Carr, N., & Lovelock, B. (2016). Community participation framework for protected area-based tourism planning. Tourism Planning & Development, 13(4), 469–485.
  15. Boley, B. B., McGehee, N. G., Perdue, R. P., & Long, P. (2014). Empowerment