Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Impact of Body Perception and Self-Esteem Status in Patients with Fournier’s Gangrene

Pages
13–17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Follow-up of psychological status of these patients might yield higher treatment success and lower mortalityrates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to determine the body perception and self-esteem status of patients with Fournier’s gangrene (FG) using the BodyCathexis scale (BCS) and Rosenberg’s Depressed Mood subscale (RSES).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Validity of the FG Severity index (FGSI), designed to determine diseaseseverity in these patients, has also been evaluated.Materials and Methods: A total of 44 men who underwent surgery for FG in authors’ clinics between December 2009 and December 2018 wereincluded in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Follow-up of psychological status of these patients might yield higher treatment success and lower mortalityrates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to determine the body perception and self-esteem status of patients with Fournier’s gangrene (FG) using the BodyCathexis scale (BCS) and Rosenberg’s Depressed Mood subscale (RSES). Validity of the FG Severity index (FGSI), designed to determine diseaseseverity in these patients, has also been evaluated.Materials and Methods: A total of 44 men who underwent surgery for FG in authors’ clinics between December 2009 and December 2018 wereincluded in this study. Body perception and self-esteem status of patients with FG were measured by BCS and RSES in our study. The FGSI wasevaluated and stratified by survival.Results: The mean age of patients was 60±12 (range: 35-77) years. Out of 44 patients; 18.1% (n=8) died, whereas 81.9% (n=36) survived. Theaverage BCS score of patients was 89±33 (range: 43-159). The mean BCS score of non-survivors was lower than that of survivors (59±25 and 94±31,respectively) (p=0.002). The average RSES score of patients was 2±1 (range: 0-5). No statistically significant difference noted between RSES scoresof non-survivors and survivors (3±1 vs 2±1) (p=0.1). FGSI scores of non-survivor and survivor groups were similar (p=0.15).Conclusion: Patients with FG have the tendency for low illness perception and high depression mood status. Also, FGSI score could not predict thedisease severity and patients’ survival. Follow-up of psychological status of these patients might yield higher treatment success and lower mortalityrates.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖSEOĞLU, E., BALCI, M., OĞUZ, U., KETEN, T., ENER, K., GÜZEL, Ö., AYKANAT, C., KISA, C., EROL, B., TUNCEL, A. (2021). Impact of Body Perception and Self-Esteem Status in Patients with Fournier’s Gangrene. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 13–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/347516

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Fournier JA. Gangrene foudroyante de la verge. Semin Med. 1883;3:345- 348
  2. Tarchouli M, Bounaim A, Essarghini M, Ratbi MB, Belhamidi MS, Bensal A, Zemmouri A, Ali AA, Sair K. Analysis of prognostic factors affecting mortality in Fournier’s gangrene: A study of 72 cases. Can Urol Assoc J 2015;9:E800-804
  3. Tuncel A, Aydin O, Tekdogan U, Nalcacioglu V, Capar Y, Atan A. Fournier’s gangrene: Three years of experience with 20 patients and validity of the Fournier’s Gangrene Severity Index Score. Eur Urol 2006;50:838-843
  4. Erol B, Tuncel A, Hanci V, Tokgoz H, Yildiz A, Akduman B, Kargi E, Mungan A. Fournier’s gan-grene: overview of prognostic factors and definition of new prognostic parameter. Urology 2010;75:1193-1198
  5. Tuncel A, Keten T, Aslan Y, Kayali M, Erkan A, Koseoglu E, Atan A. Comparison of different scor-ing systems for outcome prediction in patients with Fournier’s gangrene: experience with 50 patients. Scand J Urol 2014;48:393-399
  6. Erol B, Tuncel A, Tok A, Hanci V, Sari U, Sendogan F, Budak S, Aydemir H, Amasyali AS, Yild-irim A, Caskurlu T. Low magnesium levels an important new prognostic parameter can be overlooked in pa-tients with Fournier’s gangrene: a multicentric study. Int Urol Nephrol 2015;47:1939-1945
  7. Laor E, Palmer LS, Tolia BM, Reid RE, Winter HI. Outcome prediction in patients with Fournier’s gangrene. J Urol 1995;154:89-92
  8. Secord PF, Jourard SM. The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self. J Consult Psychol 1953;17:343-347
  9. Orlandi E, Covezzi R, Galeazzi GM, Guaraldi GP. The Italian version of the Body Cathexis Scale. Eating Weight Disord 2006;11:e79-84
  10. Çuhadaroğlu F. Adolesanlarda Benlik Saygısı. Journal of Dependence. 2014;15:142-149
  11. Sorensen MD, Krieger JN, Rivara FP, Klein MB, Wessells H. Fournier’s gangrene: Management and mortality predictors in a population based study. J Urol 2009;182:2742-2747
  12. Meyer D, Leventhal H, Gutmann M. Common-sense models of illness: the example of hypertension. Health Psychol 1985;4:115-135
  13. Leysen M, Nijs J, Meeus M, Paul van Wilgen C, Struyf F, Vermandel A, Kuppens K, Roussel NA. Clinimetric properties of illness perception questionnaire revised (IPQ-R) and brief illness perception question-naire (Brief IPQ) in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. Man Ther 2015;20:10-17
  14. Cybulski M, Cybulski L, Krajewska-Kulak E, Cwalina U. Illness acceptance, pain perception and ex-pectations for physicians of the elderly in Pola