Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Factors Influencing the Success of Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatment for Urinary System Stone Disease in Children Aged 0-2

Pages
162–166
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Factors for predicting success in terms of overall stone-free rate were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.Results: The mean age of the group was 14.39±4.56 months.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Factors that may influence the efficiency and reliability of shock wave lithotripsy have been examined in the treatment of stone diseasein patients aged 0-2.Materials and Methods: The data of 149 patients treated with shock wave lithotripsy in our clinic between the ages of 0 and 2 years wereevaluated retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Factors for predicting success in terms of overall stone-free rate were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.Results: The mean age of the group was 14.39±4.56 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There wereno major complications observed.Conclusion: Our study has shown that shock wave lithotripsy can be used with high success and low morbidity in the treatment of urinary systemstone disease in children aged 0-2, especially in the presence of a single stone.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Factors that may influence the efficiency and reliability of shock wave lithotripsy have been examined in the treatment of stone diseasein patients aged 0-2.Materials and Methods: The data of 149 patients treated with shock wave lithotripsy in our clinic between the ages of 0 and 2 years wereevaluated retrospectively. Factors for predicting success in terms of overall stone-free rate were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.Results: The mean age of the group was 14.39±4.56 months. The stone-free status was achieved in 102 (70.5%) patients in the first session, 15(65.2%) of 23 patients in the second session, and 2 (50%) of 4 patients in the third session. Thus, 122 (81.9%) of the children were stone-free aftershock wave lithotripsy at an average of 10.01±11.34 months of follow-up. The mean stone size was 8.66±3.47 mm. Moreover, smaller stone size andsingle stones were found to be significant predictors of treatment success (p=0.007 and p≤0.001, respectively). Additionally, it was determined thatthe single number of stones had a positive effect on treatment success in multivariable analysis (area under the curve=0.683, p=0.002). There wereno major complications observed.Conclusion: Our study has shown that shock wave lithotripsy can be used with high success and low morbidity in the treatment of urinary systemstone disease in children aged 0-2, especially in the presence of a single stone.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARTAL, İ., ALTAN, M., ÇITAMAK, B., MAMMADOV, E., BOZACI, A. C., TEKGÜL, S. (2021). Factors Influencing the Success of Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatment for Urinary System Stone Disease in Children Aged 0-2. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 162–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/347499

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Narter F, Narter F, Sarıca K. Urinary Stones in Neonates: Dilemma Between Urolithiasis and Nephrocalcinosis. Journal of Urological Surgery 2015;1:1-6
  2. Bartosh SM. Medical management of pediatric stone disease. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:575-587
  3. Myers DA, Mobley TB, Jenkins JM, Grine WB, Jordan WR. Pediatric low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar. J Urol 1995;153:453-457
  4. Brad AB, Ferro M, Vartolomei MD, Tătaru S, Anton-Păduraru DT, Simion C, Martha O, Pricop C, Porreca A, Negru I. Particularities and Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Children. Urol Int 2019;103:318- 325
  5. Coward RJ, Peters CJ, Duffy PG, Corry D, Kellett MJ, Choong S, van’t Hoff WG. Epidemiology of paediatric renal stone disease in the UK. Arch Dis Child 2003;88:962-965
  6. Sarıkaya S, Karşıyakalı N, Sicimli C, Kaya E, Ebiloğlu T, Bedir S, Özgürtaş T, Karataş ÖF. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery or Shock Wave Lithotripsy?: Comparison of the Effects on Renal Functions by Glomerular Filtration Rate. Journal of Urological Surgery 2019;6:295-301
  7. Yu C, Longfei L, Long W, Feng Z, Jiping N, Mao L, Lin Q, Hequn C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of new onset hypertension after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol 2014;46:719-725
  8. Lu P, Wang Z, Song R, Wang X, Qi K, Dai Q, Zhang W, Gu M. The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis 2015;43:199-206
  9. Göktaş C, Akça O, Horuz R, Gökhan O, Albayrak S, Sarica K. Does child’s age affect interval to stone-free status after SWL? A critical analysis. Urology 2012;79:1138-1142
  10. Younesi Rostami M, Taghipour-Gorgikolai M, Sharifian R. Treatment of Kidney Stones Using Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) and Double-J Stent in Infants. Adv Urol 2012;2012:589038
  11. Turna B, Tekin A, Yağmur İ, Nazlı O. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in infants less than 12-month old. Urolithiasis 2016;44:435-440
  12. Tan MO, Kirac M, Onaran M, Karaoglan U, Deniz N, Bozkirli I. Factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi in children. Urol Res 2006;34:215-221
  13. Onal B, Tansu N, Demirkesen O, Yalcin V, Huang L, Nguyen HT, Cilento BG, Erozenci A. Nomogram and scoring system for predicting stone-free status after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children with urolithiasis. BJU Int 2013;111:344-352
  14. Ather MH, Noor MA. Does size and site matt