AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightA different method such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy should be considered with higher preferencefor stones above this value
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
Objective: This study aimed to investigate peri-/postoperative effects of three-dimensional measurement of stone size in patients who underwentretrograde intrarenal surgery, where preoperative stone size calculations determine the operation decisions and prognosis. Another aim is todetermine a limit value in cm3 for retrograde intrarenal surgery and to predict stone-free status based on this limit value.Materials and Methods: Data of 184 patients were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the stonefree status was achieved. Postoperative stone-free status and related effective parameters were analysed statistically.Results: No significant difference was found between age, gender, Hounsfield unit, length of hospital stay, secondary retrograde intrarenal surgery,renal unit abnormality, stone side, stone opacity, presence of additional ureteral stone, hydronephrosis and preoperative Double-J stent placementwith stone-free rate. Subsequent interventions for residual stones, number of stones, stone sizes in cm2 and cm3 and operation time were determinedas parameters that significantly affected the stone-free rate. As a result of the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the threshold stone sizewas 1.54 cm3.Conclusion: More accurate indications can be determined by calculating the volume of the stone. Retrograde intrarenal surgery success decreasesin stones >1.54 cm3 by volume calculation. A different method such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy should be considered with higher preferencefor stones above this value