Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5

Role of DECT in coronary artery disease: a comparative study with ICA and SPECT

Pages
420–428
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the same scan, DECT can accurately provide integrative imaging of coronary artery morphology and myocardial perfusion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSEEarlier imaging techniques for coronary artery disease (CAD) focused primarily on either morphological or functional assessment of CAD.
📊
Key Findings & Data:CT coronary angiography and perfusion images were generated from the same raw data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the same scan, DECT can accurately provide integrative imaging of coronary artery morphology and myocardial perfusion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSEEarlier imaging techniques for coronary artery disease (CAD) focused primarily on either morphological or functional assessment of CAD. However, dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can be used to assess myocardial blood supply both morphologically and functionally. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of DECT in detecting morphological and functional components of CAD, using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) as reference standards.METHODSTwenty-five patients with known or suspicious CAD and scheduled for ICA were investigated by DECT and SPECT. DECT was performed during the resting state using retrospective electrocardiography (ECG) gating. CT coronary angiography and perfusion images were generated from the same raw data. All patients were evaluated for significant stenosis (≥50%) on both ICA and DECT coronary angiography, and for myocardial perfusion defects on SPECT and DECT perfusion. Comparison was done between ICA and DECT coronary angiography for detection of significant stenosis and between SPECT and DECT perfusion for detecting myocardial perfusion defects.RESULTSUsing ICA as reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DECT coronary angiography in detecting ≥50% stenosis of coronary artery lumen were 81.6%, 97.8%, and 95.0%, respectively, by segment-based analysis and 92.1%, 96.1%, and 93.7%, respectively, by vessel-based analysis. Using SPECT as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DECT perfusion in detecting myocardial perfusion defects were 70.4%, 86.4%, and 80.6%, respectively, on per-segment analysis and 90.7%, 66.6%, and 84.7%, respectively, on per-territorial basis.CONCLUSIONDECT accurately detected coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia using ICA and SPECT as reference standards. In the same scan, DECT can accurately provide integrative imaging of coronary artery morphology and myocardial perfusion.

🔖

Cite This Article

REDDY, K. V. P., SINHAL, M., VIJAYVERGIYA, R., SOOD, A., KHANDELWAL, N. (2020). Role of DECT in coronary artery disease: a comparative study with ICA and SPECT. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 5, 420–428. https://ajindex.com/articles/346447

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cheng W, Zeng M, Arellano C, et al. Detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities: standard dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography versus rest/stress technetium-99m single-photon emission CT. Br J Radiol 2010
  2. 652–660. [Crossref] 2. Vliegenthart R, Pelgrim GJ, Ebersberger U, Rowe GW, Oudkerk M, Schoepf UJ. Dual-energy CT of the heart. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012
  3. 199 (Suppl 5):S54–63. [Crossref] 3. Iwasaki K. Myocardial ischemia is a key factor in the management of stable coronary artery disease. World J Cardiol 2014
  4. [Crossref] 4. Sun Z. Coronary CT angiography: Beyond morphological stenosis analysis. World J Cardiol 2013
  5. [Crossref] 5. Ramsey BC, Fentanes E, Choi AD, Branch KR, Thomas DM. Myocardial assessment with cardiac CT: ischemic heart disease and beyond. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 2018
  6. [Crossref] 6. Beller GA, Zaret BL. Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000
  7. 1465–1478. [Crossref] 7. Wackers FT. SPECT detection of coronary artery disease. In: Dilsizian V, Narula J, Braunwald E, eds. Atlas of nuclear cardiology. Current Medicine Group, 2003
  8. 63–77. [Crossref] 8. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998
  9. 535–543. [Crossref] 9. Taillefer R, DePuey EG, Udelson JE, Beller GA, Latour Y, Reeves F. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of Tl-201 and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging (perfusion and ECG-gated SPECT) in detecting coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997
  10. 69–77. [Crossref] 10. Brown KA, Rowen M. Prognostic value of a normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging study in patients with angiographically significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1993
  11. 865–867. [Crossref] 11. Salerno M, Beller GA. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009
  12. 412–424. [Crossref] 12. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006
  13. 1761–1791. [Crossref] 13. Miller