Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi / 2009 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 58

Assessment of the Law of Local Education Authorities according to the Aspects of Leadership Behavior and the Extent of Their Practice

Pages
299–319
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is revealed that it is not appropriate for the authorities who practice the LNED to demonstrate the overall aspects of leadership, and it is also understood that the “organizational leadership” aspect is primarily required.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the aspects of leadership behavior required by the Law of National Education Directorates and to reveal the extent of their practice within the boundaries of Sivas in individuals, and in Turkey in general.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To determine the extent to which the law is practiced, an interview form has been applied to 35 people, including 7 Assistant Directors of Local Education, 11 Primary Education Inspectors, 10 Principals in the center of Sivas province, and 7 Ministry inspectors who were in charge in Sivas when the study had been done.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is revealed that it is not appropriate for the authorities who practice the LNED to demonstrate the overall aspects of leadership, and it is also understood that the “organizational leadership” aspect is primarily required.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the aspects of leadership behavior required by the Law of National Education Directorates and to reveal the extent of their practice within the boundaries of Sivas in individuals, and in Turkey in general. Data were collected through document analysis and interviews. To impart the aspects of leadership required by the LNED, each article in the law is classified by the researchers with regards to six aspects of leadership: visionary, instructional, organizational, collaborative, ethical and political leadership. To determine the extent to which the law is practiced, an interview form has been applied to 35 people, including 7 Assistant Directors of Local Education, 11 Primary Education Inspectors, 10 Principals in the center of Sivas province, and 7 Ministry inspectors who were in charge in Sivas when the study had been done. Furthermore, to determine the extent to which the aspects of leadership behavior identified by the law are practiced, two findings are synthesized; in this way the extent of practice of leadership behaviors that are specified as the areas of service in the law is disclosed. It is revealed that it is not appropriate for the authorities who practice the LNED to demonstrate the overall aspects of leadership, and it is also understood that the “organizational leadership” aspect is primarily required. It is also seen that in the practice of the law, the services of education, budget investment, research planning statistics and civil defense, are areas of service that are performed relatively less often. Furthermore, in Turkey in general all services mentioned in the law are hardly performed; therefore, indeed, even “organizational leadership” is not practiced enough. The LNED does not allow the education authorities of big cities and districts to be leaders.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPRAKÇI, E., YÜCEL, H., ÇAKIRER, İ., TOKAT, S. (2009). Assessment of the Law of Local Education Authorities according to the Aspects of Leadership Behavior and the Extent of Their Practice. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 58, 299–319. https://ajindex.com/articles/343797

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aksoy, E. (2006). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin öğretimsel liderlik rolleri: Aydın örneği. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi,
  2. Çankkale, Türkiye. Aydın, M. (2005). Eğitim yönetimi. Ankara:
  3. Hatiboğlu Yayınları.
  4. Ayyar, R. V. V. (1996). Educational policy planning and globalization. International Journal of Educational Development, 16(4), 347-353.
  5. Bates, J. M. (1993). The efficiency of local education authorities. Oxford Review of Education, 19(3), 277-289.
  6. Beck, L. G. and J. Murphy. (1993). Understanding the principalship: Metaphorical themes. 1920s-1990s. New York: Columbia University Teachers College Press.
  7. Bezzina, C. (2000). Educational leadership for twenty-first century Malta: Breaking the bonds of dependency. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(7), 299-307.
  8. Blase, J. and P. Kirby. (2000). Bringing out the best in teachers: What effective principals do. (2nd ed), Thousand Oaks: CA: Corwin Press.
  9. Burch, P. (2007).The Professionalization of instructional leadership in the United States: Competing values and current tensions. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 195-214.
  10. Caddell, M. (2005). Listening to Local Voices? International targets and decentralized education planning in Nepal. International Journal of Educational Development 25(4), 456-469.
  11. Calabrese, R.L. and B. Roberts. (2001). The Promise forsaken: Neglecting the ethical implications of leadership. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(6), 267-275.
  12. Çelik, V. (1999). Eğitimsel liderlik. Ankara:
  13. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Cinkara, M. (1999). Yapı ve işleyiş açısından il milli eğitim müdürlüklerinin analizi: Malatya örneği. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi,
  14. Malatya, Türkiye. Cheng, Y.C. (1991). Leadership style of principals and organizational process in secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration. 29(2). Davies, B. (1996). Re-engineering school leadership. International Journal of Educational Management 10(2), 11–16.
  15. DfEE. (2000). The role of the local education authority in school education. Nottingham: DfEE Publications. Doğan, V. (2006). İlköğretim okul müdürlerinin toplumsal liderlik yeterliliklerinin belirlenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi,
  16. İstanbul,
  17. Türkiye. Durrant, J. (2001). The evolution of policy making within a local education authority. Educate Journal, 1(1). Erçetin, Ş. (1998). Lider sarmalında vizyon. Ankara:
  18. Önder Matbaacılık Gareth, E.J. (2002). Poli