Journals / Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Parotis bezi pleomorfik adenomlarında ekstrakapsüler diseksiyon ile süperfisyal parotidektominin karşılaştırılma

Extracapsular dissection versus superficial parotidectomy in pleomorphic adenomas of the parotid gland

Pages
76–79
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Extracapsullary dissection is a safe and reliable surgical procedure compared to superficial parotidectomy with a lower complication rate and a similiar recurrence rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ectives: We aimed to compare the results of extracapsullary dissection (ED) with superficial parotidectomy (SP) in the surgical treatment of benign parotid tumors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Forty-one patients who were diagnosed with pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland and underwent surgery between January 1992 and June 2000 were enrolled in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Extracapsullary dissection is a safe and reliable surgical procedure compared to superficial parotidectomy with a lower complication rate and a similiar recurrence rate.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ectives: We aimed to compare the results of extracapsullary dissection (ED) with superficial parotidectomy (SP) in the surgical treatment of benign parotid tumors. Patients and Methods: Forty-one patients who were diagnosed with pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland and underwent surgery between January 1992 and June 2000 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: the ED group (6 males, 15 females; mean age 47.2 years; range 32 to 57 years) and the SP group (7 males, 13 females; mean age 47.7 years; range 29 to 61 years). ED was performed on 21 patients and SP was performed on 20 patients. All patients were followed-up postoperatively and the mean follow-up time was 194 (range 117 to 264) months. Results: Although no complications developed in the ED group patients during the follow-up period, there were several cases in the SP group: three cases of salivary fistula, one of Frey’s syndrome, three case of temporary facial paresis and 13 of cosmetic deformity. The cosmetic deformities were as minimal depressions in the parotid region. There have been no recurrences in either group. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding cosmetic deformity (p=0.000 and X2=19.27). There was also a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding general complications (p=0.001 and X2Y: 8.32). Conclusion: Extracapsullary dissection is a safe and reliable surgical procedure compared to superficial parotidectomy with a lower complication rate and a similiar recurrence rate.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada selim parotis tümörlerinin cerrahi tedavisinde ekstrakapsüler diseksiyon (ED) ile süperfisyal parotidektomi (SP) karşılaştırıldı. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya Ocak 1992 ile Haziran 2000 tarihleri arasında parotis bezinde pleomorfik adenom tanısı konulan ve ameliyat edilen 41 hasta dahil edildi. Hastalar ED grubu (6 erkek, 15 kadın; ort. yaş 47.2 yıl; dağılım 32-57 yıl) ve SP grubu (7 erkek, 13 kadın; ort. yaş 47.7 yıl; dağılım 29-61 yıl) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. Yirmi bir hastaya ED, 20 hastaya ise SP uygulandı. Tüm hastalar ameliyat sonrası takip edildi ve ortalama takip süresi 194 ay idi (dağılım 117-264 ay). Bulgular: Takip sürecinde ED grubunda komplikasyon gelişmezken, SP grubunda üçü tükürük fistülü, biri Frey sendromu, üçü geçici fasiyal parezisi ve 13’ü kozmetik olmak üzere çeşitli deformiteler gelişti. Kozmetik deformiteler parotis alanında minimal çökme şeklindeydi. İki grupta da herhangi bir rekürens meydana gelmedi. Kozmetik deformite göz önüne alındığında iki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark vardı (p=0.000 ve X2=19.27). Genel komplikasyon oranı göz önüne alındığında da iki grup arasında anlamlı fark vardı (p=0.001 ve X2Y: 8.32). Sonuç: Ekstrakapsüler disseksiyon süperfisiyal parotidektomi ile karşılaştırıldığında daha düşük bir komplikasyon oranı ve benzer bir rekürens oranı ile güvenli ve güvenilir bir cerrahi tekniktir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYAR, Y., ÇAĞLAK, F., KELEŞ, B., YILDIRIM, G., SALTÜRK, Z. (2011). Parotis bezi pleomorfik adenomlarında ekstrakapsüler diseksiyon ile süperfisyal parotidektominin karşılaştırılma. Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 76–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/342767

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Spiro RH, Koss LG, Hajdu SI, Strong EW. Tumors of minor salivary origin. A clinicopathologic study of 492 cases. Cancer 1973;31:117-29
  2. Sungur N, Akan IM, Ulusoy MG, Ozdemir R, Kilinç H,Ortak T. Clinicopathological evaluation of parotid gland tumors: a retrospective study. J Craniofac Surg 2002;13:26-30
  3. Woods JE, Chong GC, Beahrs OH. Experience with I,360 primary parotid tumors. Am J Surg 1975;130:460-2
  4. Senn N. The pathology and surgical treatment of tumors. Philedelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1895
  5. Bailey H. Treatment of tumors of the parotid gland with special reference to total parotidectomy. Br J Surg 1941;28:337-346 6. Mcfarlan J. Three hundred mixed tumors of the salivary glands, of which sixtynine recurred. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1936;63:457-468
  6. Anderson R. Benign mixed tumors of the parotid gland. In: Chambers RG, lanssen de Limpens AMP, laques DA, Rouledge RT, editors. Cancer of the head and neck, proceedings of an international symposium. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica; 1975. p. 1555-8
  7. Gleave EN, Whittaker JS, Nicholson A. Salivary tumours-experience over thirty years. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1979;4:247-57
  8. Cuhruk C, Yılmaz O. Tükrük bezi hastalıkları. In: Çelik O, editör. Kulak kurun boğaz baş ve boyun cerrahisi. İzmir: Asya Tıp Kitabevi; 2007. s. 590-623
  9. Peel RL, Seethala RR. Pathology of salivary gland disorders. In: Eugene NM, Ferris RL, editors. Salivary gland disorders. Berlin: Springer Publishers; 2007. p. 33-105
  10. Bradley PJ. Reccurrent pleomorrhic adenoma. In: Eugene NM, Ferris RL, editors. Salivary gland disorders. Berlin: Springer Publishers; 2007. p. 267-81
  11. Hugo NE, McKinney P, Griffith BH. Management of tumors of the parotid gland. Surg Clin North Am 1973;53:105-11
  12. Guntinas-Lichius O, Klussmann JP, Wittekindt C, Stennert E. Parotidectomy for benign parotid disease at a university teaching hospital: outcome of 963 operations. Laryngoscope 2006;116:534-40
  13. Metson R, Thornton A, Nadol JB Jr, Fee WE Jr. A new design for intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;98:258-61
  14. Prichard AJ, Barton RP, Narula AA. Complications of superficial parotidectomy versus extracapsular lumpectomy in the treatment of benign parotid lesions. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992;37:155-8
  15. McGurk M, Renehan A, Gleave EN, Hancock BD. Clinical significance of the tumour capsule in the treatment of parotid pleomorphic adenomas. Br J Surg 1996;83:1747-9
  16. Maynard ID. Management of pleomorphic a