Journals / Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 5

A comparison of the effects of mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty on contralateral ear using otoacoustic emission in chronic otitis media surgery

Kronik otitis media cerrahisinde mastoidektomi ve timpanoplastinin karşı kulak üzerindeki etkilerinin otoakustik emisyon ile karşılaştırılması

Pages
253–259
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: During the first and seventh days of surgery in both mastoidectomy with drilling and tympanoplasty surger y without drilling, statistically significant changes were observed in contralateral DPOAE amplitutudes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: In this study, we compared possible changes in the opposite ears of the patients who underwent mastoid surgery using a drill or tympanoplasty surgery without the use of a drill through distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Between November 2011 and March 2012, a total of 41 patients (17 mastoidectomy, 24 tympanoplasty) who were scheduled for surgery with the diagnosis of chronic otitis media without any pathology identified in their contralateral ears in our clinic were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: During the first and seventh days of surgery in both mastoidectomy with drilling and tympanoplasty surger y without drilling, statistically significant changes were observed in contralateral DPOAE amplitutudes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we compared possible changes in the opposite ears of the patients who underwent mastoid surgery using a drill or tympanoplasty surgery without the use of a drill through distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Patients and Methods: Between November 2011 and March 2012, a total of 41 patients (17 mastoidectomy, 24 tympanoplasty) who were scheduled for surgery with the diagnosis of chronic otitis media without any pathology identified in their contralateral ears in our clinic were included. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions measurements were performed on their opposite ears of the patients for which no surgery was planned at the frequencies of 1, 1.4, 2, 2.8 and 4 kHz on pre- and postoperative day one and day seven. Results: A statistically significant difference was found in the measurements taken on pre- and postoperative day seven at the frequency of 1.4 kHz in patients who underwent mastoidectomy. For the patients who underwent tympanoplasty, statistically significant differences were identified in the measurements on pre- and postoperative day one and postoperative day one-day seven at the frequency of 1 kHz; pre- and postoperative day one at 1.4 kHz; pre- and postoperative day seven and postoperative day one-day seven at 2 kHz and pre- and postoperative day one-day seven at 2.8 kHz. The comparison between mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty groups revealed a statistically significant difference in the rates of change on postoperative day one-day seven at the frequencies of 1, 1.4, 2.8 kHz and on pre- and postoperative day one at the frequency of 1.4 kHz. Conclusion: During the first and seventh days of surgery in both mastoidectomy with drilling and tympanoplasty surger y without drilling, statistically significant changes were observed in contralateral DPOAE amplitutudes.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmada tur kullanarak mastoid cerrahisi yapılan ve turun kul- lanılmadığı timpanoplasti cerrahisi yapılan hastaların karşı kulaklarında oluşabilecek muhtemel değişimler distorsiyon ürünü otoakustik emisyon kullanılarak karşılaştırıldı. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Kasım 2011 - Mart 2012 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde kronik otitis media tanısıyla ameliyat planlanan ve karşı kulaklarında patoloji saptanmayan toplamda 41 hasta (17 mastoidektomi, 24 timpanoplasti) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların cerrahi planlanmayan karşı kulaklarına ameliyat öncesinde ve ameliyat sonrasındaki birinci ve yedinci günlerde, 1, 1.4, 2, 2.8 ve 4 kHz frekanslarında distorsiyon ürünü otoakustik emisyon ölçüm- leri yapıldı. Bulgular: Mastoidektomi yapılan hastalarda 1.4 kHz frekansında ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası yedinci gün ölçümlerde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptandı. Timpanoplasti yapılan hastalarda ise, 1 kHzde ameliyat öncesi ile ameliyat sonrası birinci gün ve ameli- yat sonrası birinci gün-yedinci gün, 1.4 kHzde ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası birinci gün, 2 kHzde ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası yedinci gün ve ameliyat sonrası birinci gün-yedinci gün, 2.8 kHzde ameliyat sonrası birinci gün-yedinci gün ölçümlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptandı. Mastoidektomi ve timpanoplasti grupları kar- şılaştırıldığında; ameliyat sonrası birinci gün-yedinci gün değişim oranlarında 1, 1.4, 2.8 kHz frekanslarında ve 1.4 kHz frekansta ame- liyat öncesi ve sonrası birinci gün değişimlerde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptandı. Sonuç: Turlamanın yapıldığı mastoidektomi ve turlamanın yapılma- dığı timpanoplasti cerrahisinde, karşı kulaktaki DÜOAE amplitüdle- rinde ameliyatın birinci ve yedinci günlerinde anlamlı değişiklikler görüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKERCAN, Ö., ŞENER, B. M., YİĞİT, Ö., YÜCEL, Z. (2013). A comparison of the effects of mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty on contralateral ear using otoacoustic emission in chronic otitis media surgery. Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 5, 253–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/342565

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Marzella PL, Clark GM. Growth factors, auditory neurones and cochlear implants: a review. Acta Otolaryngol 1999;119:407-12
  2. Karatas E, Miman MC, Ozturan O, Erdem T, Kalcioglu MT. Contralateral normal ear after mastoid surgery: evaluation by otoacoustic emissions (mastoid drilling and hearing loss). ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2007;69:18-24. 3. da Cruz MJ, Fagan P, Atlas M, McNeill C. Drill-induced hearing loss in the nonoperated ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:555-8
  3. Hall AJ, Lutman ME. Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology 1999;38:277-80
  4. Palva A, Sorri M. Can an operation of deaf ear be dangerous for hearing? Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1979;360:155-7
  5. Tos M, Trojaborg N, Thomsen J. The contralateral ear after translabyrinthine removal of acoustic neuromas: is there a drill-noise generated hearing loss? J Laryngol Otol 1989;103:845-9
  6. Prasher D, Sułkowski W. The role of otoacoustic emissions in screening and evaluation of noise damage. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 1999;12:183-92
  7. Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1986;22:95-104
  8. Gorga MP, Neely ST, Bergman BM, Beauchaine KL, Kaminski JR, Peters J, et al. A comparison of transient- evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:2639-48
  9. Hashimoto K, Seki M, Miyasaka H, Watanabe K. Effect of steroids on increased permeability of blood vessels of the stria vascularis after auditory ossicle vibration by a drill in otologic surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006;115:769-74
  10. Holmquist J, Oleander R, Hallén O. Peroperative drill- generated noise levels in ear surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 1979;87:458-60
  11. Urquhart AC, McIntosh WA, Bodenstein NP. Drill- generated sensorineural hearing loss following mastoid surgery. Laryngoscope 1992;102:689-92
  12. Helms J. Acoustic trauma from the bone cutting burr. J Laryngol Otol 1976;90:1143-9
  13. Eddins AC, Zuskov M, Salvi RJ. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during prolonged noise exposure. Hear Res 1999;127:119-28
  14. Parkin JL, Wood GS, Wood RD, McCandless GA. Drill- and suction-generated noise in mastoid surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1980;106:92-6
  15. Zou J, Bretlau P, Pyykkö I, Starck J, Toppila E. Sensorineural hearing loss after vibration: an animal model for evaluating prevention and treatment of inner ear hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 2001;121