Journals / Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Koanal poliplerin cerrahi tedavisinin retrospektif analizi

Retrospective analysis of surgical treatment of choanal polyps

Pages
144–151
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no significant difference between the success rates of the endoscopic approach and combined approaches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Objectives: This study aims to discuss the efficacy of the surgical method performed in patients with choanal polyp in the light of the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: The study included 76 patients (42 males, 34 females; mean age 25.36 years; range 7 to 73 years) diagnosed with choanal polyp in the sinonasal region between January 2005 and December 2013 in the otorhinolaryngology clinic of Kocaeli University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no significant difference between the success rates of the endoscopic approach and combined approaches.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: This study aims to discuss the efficacy of the surgical method performed in patients with choanal polyp in the light of the literature. Patients and Methods: The study included 76 patients (42 males, 34 females; mean age 25.36 years; range 7 to 73 years) diagnosed with choanal polyp in the sinonasal region between January 2005 and December 2013 in the otorhinolaryngology clinic of Kocaeli University. Age, sex, and presenting complaints of the patients, as well as the characteristics of the polyps (localization, direction) were retrospectively investigated. Results: The majority (98.68%) of the patients with choanal polyp presented with nasal obstruction, followed by snoring, sleeping with the mouth open (25.0%), and nasal discharge (21.05%). According to their localizations, the origin of the polyps was the maxillary sinus in 65 patients, sphenoid sinus in six patients, middle turbinate in two patients, septum in two patients, and ethmoid sinus in one patient. Conclusion: Endoscopic approach is a safe and effective procedure for choanal polyp treatment. There was no significant difference between the success rates of the endoscopic approach and combined approaches.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, koanal polibi olan hastalarda uygulanan cerrahi yöntemin etkinliği literatür ışığında tartışıldı. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya Kocaeli Üniversitesi Kulak Burun Boğaz kliniğinde Ocak 2005 - Aralık 2013 tarihleri arasında sinonazal bölgede koanal polip tanısı konulmuş 76 hasta (42 erkek, 34 kadın; ort. yaş 25.36 yıl; dağılım 7-73 yıl) dahil edildi. Hastaların yaş, cinsiyet ve kliniğe başvuru yakınmaları ile beraber poliplerin özellikleri (yerleşim yeri, yönü) retrospektif olarak araştırıldı. Bulgular: Koanal polibi olan hastaların büyük çoğunluğu (%98.68) burun tıkanıklığı ile başvurdu; bunu horlama, ağzı açık uyuma (%25.0) ve burun akıntısı (%21.05) izledi. Yerleşim yerlerine göre polipler 65 hastada maksiller sinüs, altı hastada sfenoid sinüs, iki hastada orta konka, iki hastada septum ve bir hastada etmoid sinüs kaynaklıydı. Sonuç: Endoskopik yaklaşım koanal polip tedavisinde güvenilir ve etkili bir işlemdir. Endoskopik yaklaşım ve kombine yaklaşımların başarı oranları arasında anlamlı farklılık yoktu.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLA, K., TOPDAĞ, M., ÖZTÜRK, M., İŞERİ, M., AYDIN, Ö., KESKİN, G. (2015). Koanal poliplerin cerrahi tedavisinin retrospektif analizi. Kulak Burun Boğaz İhtisas Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 144–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/342461

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. REFERENCES 1. Ozcan C, Duce MN, Görür K. Choanal polyp originating from the middle turbinate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;261:184-6. 2. Altun H, Teker AM, Ceran M, Gedikli O. Endoscopic approach in patients with choanal polyps. [Article in Turkish] Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2008;18:74-8. 3. Jang YJ, Rhee CK, Oh CH, Ryoo HG, Kim HG, Ha M. Arachidonic acid metabolites in antrochoanal polyp and nasal polyp associated with chronic paranasal sinusitis. Acta Otolaryngol 2000;120:531-4. 4. Sunagawa M, Kinjoh K, Nakamura M, Kosugi T. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor antigen in tissue extracts of paranasal sinus mucous membranes affected by chronic sinusitis and antrochoanal polyps. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1999;256:237-41. 5. Freitas MR, Giesta RP, Pinheiro SD, Silva VC. Antrochoanal polyp: a review of sixteen cases. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2006;72:831-5. 6. Aydin O, Keskin G, Ustündağ E, Işeri M, Ozkarakaş H. Choanal polyps: an evaluation of 53 cases. Am J Rhinol 2007;21:164-8. 7. Balikci HH, Ozkul MH, Uvacin O, Yasar H, Karakas M, Gurdal M. Antrochoanal polyposis: analysis of 34 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:1651-4. 8. Özkırış M. Choanal polyp originating from the middle turbinate: a case report. ACU Sağlık Bil Derg 2012;3:187-9. 9. Frosini P, Picarella G, De Campora E. Antrochoanal polyp: analysis of 200 cases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2009;29:21-6. 10. Al-Qudah M. Bilateral antrochoanal polyps: possible pathogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1116-8. 11. Basu SK, Bandyopadhyay SN, Bora H. Bilateral antrochoanal polyps. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:561-2. 12. Sousa DW, Pinheiro SD, Silva VC, Bastos JP. Bilateral antrochoanal polyps in an adult. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2011;77:539. 13. Tatlıpınar A, Gökçeer T, Köksal S, Esen E. Our clinical experience in patients with isolated choanal polyps reaching choana. KBB-Forum 2010;9:25-9. 14. Lee TJ, Huang SF. Endoscopic sinus surgery for antrochoanal polyps in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:688-92. 15. Bozzo C, Garrel R, Meloni F, Stomeo F, Crampette L. Endoscopic treatment of antrochoanal polyps. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:145-50. 16. Ozcan C, Duce MN, Görür K. Choanal polyp originating from the cribriform plate. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:806-7.