Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under Different Levels of Irrigation and Fertigation through Drip System

Pages
433–445
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

T2F1.0 and T2F0.5 treatments can be recommended as the most effective irrigation and fertilization levels of potato.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are very few studies on cabbage at different fertigation levels in the Marmara Region, where this study was conducted.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was carried out in Bursa Uludag University Yenisehir İbrahim Orhan Vocational School application greenhouses in 2014-2015 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:T2F1.0 and T2F0.5 treatments can be recommended as the most effective irrigation and fertilization levels of potato.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

There are very few studies on cabbage at different fertigation levels in the Marmara Region, where this study was conducted. In this respect, our study has a unique quality. This study was carried out in Bursa Uludag University Yenisehir İbrahim Orhan Vocational School application greenhouses in 2014-2015 years. Five different irrigation treatments (T1: 100% (full irrigation), T2: 75%, T3: 50%, T4: 25%, T5: 0% (non-irrigated)) and two different fertigation treatments; F1.0: 100% (100:100:100 NPK) fertigation and F0.5: 50% (50:50:50 NPK) fertigation were combined together to determine the effects on yield and quality parameters of potatoes. The amount of irrigation water in 2014 and 2015 years varied between 0.0-630.0 mm and 0.0-660 mm, respectively, while evapotranspiration values varied between 180.0-670 mm and 190.0-675 mm, respectively. It was determined that irrigation water and fertigation levels, yield and quality parameters of potatoes were affected significantly. In both application years, the highest yield was obtained from T1F1.0 treatment as 45.0 and 47.0 tons’ ha-1 respectively, while the lowest yield was obtained from T5F1.0 treatment as 4.0 and 5.0 tons ha-1 , respectively. In 2014 and 2015 years the crop response factor (ky) values of potato were calculated as 1.11-1.11 and 1.21-1.14, respectively. When the full fertigation (F1.0: 100% -100:100:100 NPK) and the insufficient F0.5: 50% - (50:50:50 NPK) fertigation treatments are compared, significant differences have arisen in terms of yield and quality parameters. T2F1.0 and T2F0.5 treatments can be recommended as the most effective irrigation and fertilization levels of potato.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYAS, S. (2021). Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under Different Levels of Irrigation and Fertigation through Drip System. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 433–445. https://ajindex.com/articles/341330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abdulrahman FA, Salih SA, Mahmood YA. 2018. The effect of different irrigation interval on tuber yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research (KJAR), 3(2): 27-31.
  2. Abubaker BMA, Shuang-En Y, Guang-Cheng S, Alhadi M and Elsidding A. 2014. Effects of irrigation levels on the growth, yield and quality of potato. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20(No 2): 303-309.
  3. Adhikari RC, Rana MK. 2017. Effects of irrigation and potash levels on growth and yield of potato. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment Vol (18): 106-114.
  4. Agrawal N, Tamrakar SK, Tripathi MP, Tiwari RB. 2018. Response of cabbage under different levels of irrigation and fertigation through drip. Int.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci.Special Issue 6: 750-759.
  5. Alva AK, Moore AD, Collins HP. 2012. Impact of deficit irrigation on tuber yield and quality of potato cultivars. Journal of Crop Improvement, 26: 211-227. Anonymous. 2016a. The Annual Report of Meteorological Station, Bursa, Turkey. www.mgm.gov.tr/verideğerlendirme/ il-ve-ilceler-statistic.aspx?k Anonymous. 2016b. The Meteorological Station of Greenhouse Application Area, Yenişehir-Bursa, Turkey. www.mgm.gov.tr/ verideğerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-statistic.aspx?k Anonymous. 2019. Product Tables; Potatoes in the world (Potatoes Bulletin). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara, Turkey. Anonymous 2020. Registered varieties in our country. http://www.sorhocam.com. AOAC. (Association of Official Analytical Chemistry) 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. AOAC, Washington, DC, USA. Ashraf SO, Ewees MSA. 2008. The possible use of humic acid incorporated with drip irrigation system to alleviate the harmful effects of saline water on tomato plants. – Fayoum J. Agric. Res. & Dev. 22(1). Ayas S, Korukçu A. 2010. Water-yield relationships in deficit irrigated potato. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 24 (2): 23–36. Ayas S. 2013. The Effects of different regimes on potato (Solanum Tuberosum L., Hermes) yield and quality characteristics under unheated greenhouse conditions. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 19 (No 1): 87-95.
  6. Badr MA, El-Tohamy WA, Zaghloul AM. 2012. Yield and water use efficiency of potato grown under different irrigation and nitrogen levels in an arid region. Agricultural Water Management, 110: 9-15.
  7. Bero NJ, Ruark MD, Lowery B. 2014. Controlled-Release Fertilizer Effect on Potato and Groundwater Nitrogen in Sandy Soil. Agronomy, Soils