Journals / Uluslararası tarım araştırmalarında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar dergisi (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Impact of Sowing Dates on Forage Value of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Under Semi-arid Conditions

Pages
172–182
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most suitable planting date for quinoa plant in semi-arid climatic conditions was determined as 1 April and can be recommended in similar ecologies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was aimed to determine forage value of quinoa at the different sowing dates under semi-arid conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research was conducted according to randomized complete blocks design with three replicates in Harran plain conditions in 2016, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most suitable planting date for quinoa plant in semi-arid climatic conditions was determined as 1 April and can be recommended in similar ecologies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study was aimed to determine forage value of quinoa at the different sowing dates under semi-arid conditions. Research was conducted according to randomized complete blocks design with three replicates in Harran plain conditions in 2016, Sanliurfa, Turkey. Q-52 Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) variety was used as plant material. In the study 9 different sowing dates were used such as 15 February, 1 March, 15 March, 1 April, 15 April, 1 May, 15 May, 1 June and 15 June. In the research plant height, stem diameter, number of branches per plant, biomass yield, dry forage yield and harvest index were investigated. As a result of the research, statistically significant differences were seen between sowing dates at tested characteristics (P≤0.01). As a result of the research, statistically significant differences were seen between sowing dates at tested characteristics (P≤0.01). Plant height ranged from 81.8 cm to 109.4 cm, stem diameter from 9.0 mm to 12.6 mm, number of branches per plant from 10.3 to 12.7 number. The highest biomass yield was obtained from 1 April sowing date with 1751.40 kg da-1 whereas the lowest biomass yield was seen at June 15 sowing date with 1295.28 kg da-1. Dry matter yield values were between 415.8 (15 February) and 546.88 kg da-1 (1 April). Harvest index values were between 39.3% and 42.0%. Quinoa yield characteristics in generally increased from 15 February to 1 April sowing dates, but after 1 April sowing dates decreased. Higher values were obtained from April and May sowing dates. The most suitable planting date for quinoa plant in semi-arid climatic conditions was determined as 1 April and can be recommended in similar ecologies.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖKTEM, A., ÖKTEM, A. G., BİRDEN, Ö. F. (2021). Impact of Sowing Dates on Forage Value of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Under Semi-arid Conditions. Uluslararası tarım araştırmalarında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar dergisi (Online), Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 172–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/341228

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Anonymous, 2016. Sanliurfa Meteorological Station Climatic Report, Sanliurfa. Bertero, H.D. & Ruiz, R.A. (2010). Reproductive partitioning in sea level quinoa Cheno-podium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Field Crops Research, 118:94-101.
  2. Curti, R.N, Andrade, A.J, Bramardi, S., Vela´squez, B. & Bertero, H.D. (2012). Ecogeographic structure of phenotypic diversity in cultivated populations of quinoa from northwest Argentina. Annals of Applied Biology, 160: 114–125, ISSN 0003-4746.
  3. Dinc, U., Senol, S., Satin, M., Kapur, S., Güzel, N., Derici, R., Yesilsoy, M.S., Yegingil, I., Sari, M., Kaya, Z., Aydın, M., Kettas, F., Berkman, A., Colak, A.K., Yılmaz, K., Tuncgogus, B., Cavusgil, V., Ozbek, H., Gulut, K.Y., Kahraman, C., Dinc, O. & Kara E.E. (1988). Southeastern Anatolia Soils (GAP), I. Harran Plain, TUBITAK, TOAG 534, Final Result Report, Ankara,. Garcia, M. (2003). Agroclimatic study and drought resistance analysis of Quinoa for an irrigation strategy in the Bolivian Altiplano. Ph.D. dissertation. Dissertationes de Agricultura N0:556. Fac. of Agr. and Applied Biol. Sciences, K.U. Leuven, Belgium. Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Taboada, C., Miranda, R. & Cusicanqui, R.J. (2008). Potential of closing quinoa yield gaps by deficit irrigation under varying water availability in the Bolivian Altiplano. Agricultural Water Management 96, 1652-1658.
  4. Geren H., Kavut, Y.T., Topcu, G.D., Ekren, S. & Istipliler, D. (2014). Effects of different sowing times on grain yield and some yield elements in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) grown under Mediterranean climate conditions. Journal of Ege Univ. Faculty of Agriculture 51(3), 297-305.
  5. Gesinski, K. (2008). Evaluation of the development and yielding potential of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. under the climatic conditions of Europe, Part One: Accomodation of Chenopodium quinoa (Willd.) to different conditions, Acta Agrobotanica, 61(1), 179-184.
  6. Gonzalez, J.A., Gallardo, M., Hilal, M., Rosa, M. & Prado, F.E. (2009). Physiological re-sponses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought and waterlogging stresses: Dry matter partitioning. Botanical Studies, 50, 35-42.
  7. Hirich, A., Choukr, R. & Jacobsen, S.E. (2014). Quinoa in Morocco – Effect of sowing dates on development and yield, Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 20(5): 371-377.
  8. Iliadis, C., Karyotis, TH. & Jacobsen, S.E. (1999). Effect of sowing date on seed quality and yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) in Greece, Alternative crops for sustainable agriculture, R