Journals / Research on Engineering Structures and Materials / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Fabrication and in-vitro evaluation of copper doped bioactive glass/polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

Pages
183–195
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that all scaffolds favored precipitation of calciumphosphate layer when they were soaked in SBF; they can also deliver controlleddoses of copper toward the SBF medium.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Composites developed by combining bioactive glasses and biopolymers areattractive materials for use in bone tissue engineering scaffolds due to theirbioactivity, biocompatibility, osteoconductivity and mechanical properties.From this point of view, in this study, three-dimensional polymer/bioactivecomposite scaffolds were fabricated by using polymer foam replication method.To be able to achieve this goal, in the first stage new bioactive glass compositionin the system SiO2-CaO-Na2O-P2O5 were developed with the incorporation ofcopper which have antibacterial and angiogenic properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then,the scaffolds were coated with gelatine at different percentages (1 and 3weight%) in order to improve mechanical properties of the scaffolds.Microstructural, physical, chemical and mechanical properties of the compositescaffolds were investigated by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM),energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier-transform infraredspectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), compressive strength testand porosity measurements.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that all scaffolds favored precipitation of calciumphosphate layer when they were soaked in SBF; they can also deliver controlleddoses of copper toward the SBF medium.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Composites developed by combining bioactive glasses and biopolymers areattractive materials for use in bone tissue engineering scaffolds due to theirbioactivity, biocompatibility, osteoconductivity and mechanical properties.From this point of view, in this study, three-dimensional polymer/bioactivecomposite scaffolds were fabricated by using polymer foam replication method.To be able to achieve this goal, in the first stage new bioactive glass compositionin the system SiO2-CaO-Na2O-P2O5 were developed with the incorporation ofcopper which have antibacterial and angiogenic properties. Scaffolds that mimicthe structure of the foams were obtained after the heat treatment process. Then,the scaffolds were coated with gelatine at different percentages (1 and 3weight%) in order to improve mechanical properties of the scaffolds.Microstructural, physical, chemical and mechanical properties of the compositescaffolds were investigated by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM),energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier-transform infraredspectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), compressive strength testand porosity measurements. Furthermore, bioactivity and biodegradabilitybehavior of the samples were determined by in vitro simulated body fluid (SBF)studies. The results showed that all scaffolds favored precipitation of calciumphosphate layer when they were soaked in SBF; they can also deliver controlleddoses of copper toward the SBF medium. It was concluded that scaffolds coatedwith gelatine may be promising candidates for bone tissue engineeringapplications due to their porosity, bioactivity and appropriate biodegradationrate

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, A., ÖZER, I., TAYGUN, M. E., KÜÇÜKBAYRAK, S. (2020). Fabrication and in-vitro evaluation of copper doped bioactive glass/polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 183–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/340355

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Fu Q, Saiz E, Rahaman MN, Tomsia AP. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives. Materials science and engineering: C. 2011; 31(7):1245-1256.
  2. Gaihre B, Jayasuriya A. Comparative investigation of porous nanohydroxyapaptite/chitosan, nano-zirconia/chitosan and novel nano-calcium zirconate/chitosan composite scaffolds for their potential applications in bone regeneration. Materials science and engineering: C. 2018; 91, 330-339.
  3. Gönen SÖ, Taygun ME, Küçükbayrak S. Fabrication of bioactive glass containing nanocomposite fiber mats for bone tissue engineering applications. Composite structures. 2016; 138, 96-106.
  4. Hsu FY, Hsu HW, Chang YH, Yu JL, Rau LR, Tsai SW. Macroporous microbeads containing apatite-modified mesoporous bioactive glass nanofibres for bone tissue engineering applications. Materials science and engineering: C. 2018; 89, 346-354.
  5. Mallick SP, Singh BN, Rastogi A, Srivastava P. Design and evaluation of chitosan/poly(llactide)/pectin based composite scaffolds for cartilage tissue regeneration. International journal of biological macromolecules. 2018; 112, 909-920.
  6. Moghanian A, Sedghi A, Ghorbanoghli A, Salari E. The effect of magnesium content on in vitro bioactivity, biological behavior and antibacterial activity of sol-gel derived 58s bioactive glass. Ceramics international. 2018; 44(8), 9422-9432.
  7. Rahaman MN, Day DE, Bal BS, Fu Q, Jung SB, Bonewald LF, Tomsia AP. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta biomaterialia. 2011; 7 (6), 2355-2373.
  8. Bellucci D, Cannillo V, Ciardelli G, Gentile P, Sola A. Potassium based bioactive glass for bone tissue engineering. Ceramics international. 2010; 36(8), 2449-2453.
  9. Turnbull G, Clarke J, Picard F, Riches P, Jia L, Han F, Li B, Shu W. 3D Bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioactive materials. 2018; 3 (3), 278-314.
  10. Vyas V, Kaur T, Thirugnanam A. Chitosan composite three dimensional macrospheric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. International journal of biological macromolecules. 201