Journals / Yeni Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Our approach to submandibular sialolithiasis

Submandibuler siyalolityazise yaklaşımımız

Pages
16–19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We advice intraoral excision if concreation can be diagnosed by Wharton duct palpation, otherwise the excision is preferred.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Department of Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, we searched 20 patient’s file who applied for submandibular sialolithiasis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The most common symptom is swelling of gland in 20 patients (100%) and increasing of swelling with pain after meals in 16 patients (80%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We advice intraoral excision if concreation can be diagnosed by Wharton duct palpation, otherwise the excision is preferred.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

At the E.N.T. Department of Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, we searched 20 patient’s file who applied for submandibular sialolithiasis. We evaluated the role of history and clinical examination also USG and sialography. We discussed which to prefer; intraoral way or external neck approach in the treatment of submandibular sialolithiasis. The most common symptom is swelling of gland in 20 patients (100%) and increasing of swelling with pain after meals in 16 patients (80%). All the patients underwent to USG, in 17 patients, there were ultrasonography findings about the concretion. We used intraoral way to remove the calculi and duct exposition in 5 patients and external neck approach and gland excision in 15 patients. Patients history has the most important role in diagnoses of the submandibular sialolithiasis. If the patients who have submandibular swelling have had concern about meals, we should remember sialolithiasis. We advice intraoral excision if concreation can be diagnosed by Wharton duct palpation, otherwise the excision is preferred.

Özet

Submandibular bez siyalolityazis tanısıyla kliniğimize baş- başvuran 20 hastanın dosyasını retrospektif olarak değerlendirdik. Olgularımızın tanısında anamnez ve klinik muayenenin yanısıra ultrasonografi (USG) ve siyalogra- finin önemini de araştırdık. Submandibuler siyalolityazis olgularının tedavisinde intraoral yol ile eksternal boyun yaklaşımının hangi vakalarda yapılabileceğini tartıştık. En sık karşılaşılan anamnez bulgusu 20 hastada (%100) submandibuler bölgede şişlik ve 16 (%80) hastada yemekle birlikte ağrılı şişliğin artmasıydı. Tüm hastalara USG yapıldı ve hastaların 17’sinde taşa ait bulgular saptandı. Eksternal boyun yolu ile yaklaşılan 15 hasta-dan 13’ünde siyalografide taş bulguları vardı. Hastaların 5’ine intraoral girişimle taş ekzisyonu ve kanal ekspo-zisyonu, geriye kalan 15’ine ise boyun eksplorasyonu ile bez ekzisyonu yapıldı. Submandibuler siyalolityazis tanı-sında anamnez en önemli rolü oluşturmaktadır. Subman-dibuler bölgede şişlik ile başvuran hastada özellikle şişliğin yemekle ilgisi varsa siyalolityazis olabileceğini düşünmek gerekir. Eğer palpasyonla submandibular bez kanalında taş tespit ediliyorsa taşın intraoral çıkarılması öncelikle planlanmalıdır, aksi halde eksizyon tercih edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BERÇİN, S., KUTLUHAN, A., YURTTAŞ, V., KANMAZ, A. (2009). Our approach to submandibular sialolithiasis. Yeni Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 16–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/338348

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Ellies M, Gottstein U, Rohrbach-Volland S, Arglebe C, Laskawi R. Reduction of salivary flow with botulinum toxin: extended report on 33 patients with drooling, salivary fistulas, and sialadenitis. Laryngoscope 2004;114: 1856-60
  2. Work WP, Hecht DW: Inflammatory diseases of the major salivary glands. In Papparella MM, Shumrick DF (eds): Otolaryngology, vol 3. Philadelphia, WB Saunders 1980; 2235-43
  3. Mckenna JP, Bostock DJ, Mcmenamin PG. Sialolithiasis. Am Fam Physician 1987;36: 119-25
  4. Stanley MW, Bardales RH, Beneke J, Korourian S, Stern SJ. Sialolithiasis: Differental diagnostic problems in fine niddle aspiration cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 1996; 229-33
  5. Harrsion JD, Epivatinos A, Bhatia SN. Role of microliths in the aetiology of chronic submandibular sailadentis. A clinicopathological investigation of 154 cases Histopathology 1997;31: 237-51
  6. Harril J, King J, Boyce W. Structure and composition of salivary calculi. Laryngoscope 1959;69: 482-92
  7. Hiraide F, Nomura Y. The fine surface structure and composition of salivary calculi. Laryngoscope 1980;90: 152-8
  8. Lewy RW, Devine KD. Salivary gland calculi JAMA 1962;181: 1115-9
  9. Perrotta RJ, Williams JR, Selfe RW: Simultaneous bilateral parotid and submandibular gland calculi. Arc Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1978; 104: 469-70
  10. Paul D, Chaulan SR. Salivary megalith with a sialo-cutaneous and a sialo-oral fistula: A case report. J Laryngol Otol 1995;109: 767-69
  11. Rice DH. Diseases of the salivary glands non-neoplastic. In Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Kohut RI, et al (eds): Head and Neck Surgery – Otolaryngology vol 1. Philadelphia, JB, Lippincott 1993; 475-84
  12. Lustmann J, Regev E, Melamed Y: Sialolithiasis: A survey on 245 patients and a review of the literature Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1990;19: 135-8
  13. Brodner L, Azaz B. Submandibular sialolithiasis in children. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;40: 551-4
  14. Isacsson G, Isberg A, Haverling M, Lundquist PG. Salivary calculi and chronic sialoadenitis of the submandibular gland: A radiographic and histologic study. Oral Surg 1984;58: 622-7
  15. Kenettic JS. Some aspects of salivary gland disorders. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 1975;68: 282-5
  16. Weissmann JL. Imagng of the sallivary glands. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1995;16: 546-68
  17. Van den Akker HP. Diagnostic imaging in salivary gland disease. Oral Surg Med Oral Pathol 1988;66: 625-37
  18. Yoshimura T, Morishita T, Sugihara T. Salivary gland function after sial