SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim Dergisi:İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü / 2005 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 50

Lider - Üye Etkileşimi ve Güvenin Psikolojik Güçlendirmeye Etkileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Adnan CEYLAN
Soner ÖZBAL
Alper DİNÇ
Mustafa KESGİN
Pages
25–40
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a conclusion managerial trust was found to have an indirect effect on employee empowerment by means of LMX.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although managerial trust, employee empowerment and leader member exchange were evaluated in many reports, it is obviously noticed that the number of studies related with these subjects are insufficient for our country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the employee empowerment in private courses, which have significant importance in the education sector, was evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a conclusion managerial trust was found to have an indirect effect on employee empowerment by means of LMX.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although managerial trust, employee empowerment and leader member exchange were evaluated in many reports, it is obviously noticed that the number of studies related with these subjects are insufficient for our country. Employee empowerment which is carried out by certain organizations in our country, was suggested as a product of new management concept. In this study, the employee empowerment in private courses, which have significant importance in the education sector, was evaluated. Initially LMX, managerial trust and employee empowerment were defined. Consequently regression analyses were performed according to the methodology of the research. As a conclusion managerial trust was found to have an indirect effect on employee empowerment by means of LMX.

Özet

Literatürde yönetici-çalışan arasındaki güven, personel güçlendirmesi ve lider-üye etkileşimi ile ilgili çok sayıda çalışma olmasına rağmen ülkemizde bu alanda yapılan araştırmaların sayısının yeterli olrnadığı gözlemlenmiştir. Çalışanları güçlendirmek yeni yönetim anlayışının bir ürünü olarak ortaya çıkmış ve ülkemizde bazı sektörler içerisinde uygulama şansı bulmuştur. Bu çalışma içerisinde eğitim sektöründe önemli yere sahip olan özel dershanelerde personel güçlendirmesi incelenmiştir. Çalışma esnasında öncelikle lider-üye etkileşimi, güven ve psikolojik güçlendirmenin tanımlan yapılmıştır. Daha sonra oluşturulan araştırma metodolojisi ışığında regresyon analizleri yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak güven unsurunun psikolojik güçlendirme üzerinde lider-üye etkileşimi aracılığıyla bir etkinliğe sahip olduğu gözlemlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, A., ÖZBAL, S., DİNÇ, A., KESGİN, M. (2005). Lider - Üye Etkileşimi ve Güvenin Psikolojik Güçlendirmeye Etkileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Yönetim Dergisi:İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 50, 25–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/338082

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ashforth, B.E. (1990), The organizationally induced helplessness syndrome: A preliminary model, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 7: 30-36.
  2. Bandura, A. (1989); Human agency in social cognitive theory, Ameican Psychologist, 44: 1175-1184
  3. Bauer, T.N. & Green, S.G. (1996); Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test Academy of Management Journal, 39,1538-1567.
  4. Bell, N.E., & Staw B.M. (1989); People as sculptors versus sculpture. In M.B. Arthur. D.T. Hall. & B.S. Lawrence (Eds.) Handbook of career theory: 232-251. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Borchgrevink, Carl P & Boster, Franklin J., Leader-member exchange development: A hospitality antecedent investigation, Int. Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 16, No:3, p. 241-259. Bowen. D. & Lawler E. (1992); The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when? Sloan Management Review, 33:31-39.
  6. Brief, A.P. & Nord, W.R. (1990); Meanings of occupational work. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Butler, J. K., Jr. (1983); Reciprocity öf trust between professionals and their secretaries, Psychological Reports, 53: 441-416.
  7. Butler, J. K. Jr. (1986); Reciproctiy of dydic trust in close male-female relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 126: 579-591
  8. Butter, J.K. Jr. (1991); Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust.: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No: 3, 643-663
  9. Ceylan, ADNAN (2002); Çalışanların güçlendirilme algılan üzerine Tuzla bölgesinde ticari bankalarda bir araştırma, Öneri, C.5.S. 17., ss. 113-120.
  10. Conger, J.A. & Kanungo, R.N. (1988); The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice Academy of Management Review, 13,471-482.
  11. Dansereau, F., Graen, G. & Haga, WJ. (1975); A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13,46-78
  12. Deci. EX., Connell. J.P. & Ryan, R.M. (1989); Self-detemination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Pyschology, 74:580-590 Dienesch R.M. & Liden, Leader-member exchange leadership:A critique development, Academy of Review, 11,618-634
  13. Gecas, V. (1989), The social psychology of self-efficacy. In W.R. Scott & S.Blake (Eds.), Annual Review Sociology, Vol. 15: 291-316 Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc. Gist, M. (1987); Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12:472-485.
  14. Gomez, C., Rosen, B. (2001); The Leader-Member Exchange as a