SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim Dergisi:İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü / 2003 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 46

Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk Kaynakları: Türkiye'deki Beş Yıldızlı Konaklama İşletmelerinin Yöneticileri Üzerine Pilot Bir Araştırma

H. Rıdvan YURTSEVEN
Pages
41–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the findings of the research, it appears that there is not a strong relation between levels of life satisfaction of general managers and their importance levels of sources of happiness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the research is to determine if there is a strong relation between levels of life satisfaction of general managers of five star hotels in Turkey and their importance levels of sources of happiness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Rather than take an all-inclusive definition of life satisfaction and sources of happiness, the research focuses on life domain model (Andrews and Witney, 1976; Campbell, Converse and Rodgers, 1976) and sources of happiness model (Lu and Shih, 1997).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the findings of the research, it appears that there is not a strong relation between levels of life satisfaction of general managers and their importance levels of sources of happiness.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the research is to determine if there is a strong relation between levels of life satisfaction of general managers of five star hotels in Turkey and their importance levels of sources of happiness. Rather than take an all-inclusive definition of life satisfaction and sources of happiness, the research focuses on life domain model (Andrews and Witney, 1976; Campbell, Converse and Rodgers, 1976) and sources of happiness model (Lu and Shih, 1997). Based on the findings of the research, it appears that there is not a strong relation between levels of life satisfaction of general managers and their importance levels of sources of happiness.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türkiye'deki beş yıldızlı konaklama işletmeleri yöneticilerinin yaşamdan duydukları tatmin düzeyleri ve onların mutluluk kaynaklarına verdiği önem düzeyleri arasında güçlü bir ilişki olup-olmadığını belirlemektir. Araştırma, yaşamdan duyulan tatmin ve mutluluk kaynaklarıyla ilgili tüm tanımlar yerine, yaşam alanı modeli (Andrews ve Witney, 1976; Campbell, Converse ve Rodgers, 1976) ve mutluluk kaynaklan modeline (Lu ve Shih, 1997) odaklanmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular sonucunda, yöneticilerin yaşamdan duydukları tatmin düzeyleri ve onların mutluluk kaynaklarına verdiği önem düzeyleri arasında güçlü bir ilişki olmadığı belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURTSEVEN, H. R. (2003). Yaşam Kalitesi ve Mutluluk Kaynakları: Türkiye'deki Beş Yıldızlı Konaklama İşletmelerinin Yöneticileri Üzerine Pilot Bir Araştırma. Yönetim Dergisi:İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 46, 41–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/338055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. ALHEMOUD, A. M. ve ARMSTRONG, E. G., 1996, "Image of Tourism Attractions in Kuwait", Journal of Travel Research, Vol.34 (4), 76-80.
  2. ANDREWS, P.M. ve WITNEY, S.B., 1976,
  3. Social Indicators of Well-Being, New York: Plenum. ARGYLE, M., 1987,
  4. The Psychology of Happiness, London: Routledge. ARGYLE, M. ve CROSSLAND, J., 1991, "The Dimensions of Positive Emetions", British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.26, 127-137.
  5. ARGYLE, M., MARTIN, M. ve CROSSLAND, J., 1989, Happiness as a Function of Personality and Social Encounters, icinde:Recent Advances in Social Psychology: An International Perspective (der. J.P. Forgas ve M. Innes). BLISS, C., 1996, Life-Style and The Standard of Living, içinde: The Quality of Life (der. M.C. Nussbaum ve A. Sen), Great Britain: Oxford University Press Inc. BRADBURN, N.M., 1969, The Structure of Psychological Weil-Being, Chicago: Aidine. CAMPBELL, A., CONVERSE, P. ve RODGERS, W., 1976,
  6. Quality of Life in America, New York: Russell Sape. CERTO, S.C., BUSTED, S.T. ve DOUGLAS, M.E.,1990,
  7. Business, USA: Allyn and Bacon. CHEUNG, C., 1997, "Toward A Theoretically Based Measurement Model of The Good Life", Journal o f Genetic Psychology, Vol.158, Issue 2, 200-216.
  8. COOPER, M.H., 1998,
  9. Population and The Environment, CQ Researcher, Vol.8, Issue 26, 1-22.
  10. DIENER, E., 1995, "Subjective Well-Being", Psychological Bulletin, 542-57'5. DOLAN, P., 1998, "The Measurement of Individual Utility and Social Welfare", Journal of Economics, Vol.17, Issue 1,39-52.
  11. DÜNDAR, S., 1993, "Teorik Çerçeve İçinde Yaşamdan Duyulan Tatmin Kavramı", Yönetim Dergisi, Yıl:4, Sayı: 15,49-54.
  12. FALKENBERG, A.W.,1998, "Quality of Life: Efficiency, Equity and Freedom in The United States and Scondinavia", Journal of Socio-Economies, Vol.27, Issue 1,1-27.
  13. FLOOD, J., 1997, "Urban and Housing Indicators", Urban Studies, Vol.34, Issue 10, 1635-1666.
  14. GERSON, E.M, 1976, "On Quality of Life", American Sociological Review, Vol.41, 793-806.
  15. HODGE, J., 1990, The Quality of Life: A Contrast Between Utilitarian and Existentialist Approaches, içinde: S.Baldwin: C. Godfrey ve C. Propper. LAWTON, M.P., 1975, ''TAe Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: A Revision", Journal of Gerontology, Vol.30, Issue 1,85-89.
  16. LAWTON, M.P., 1982, "A Research and Service -Oriented Multilevel Assessment Instrument", Journal of Gerontology, Vol.37, 91-99.
  17. LAWTON, M.P., 1991, A Multidimensional View of Quality of Life in Frail Elders, ipinde: The Concept and Measurement of Quality of Life (der.J.E. Biren),