Journals / Yeni Üroloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Satisfaction evaluation of the patients with penile prosthesis implantation

Penil protez implantasyonu yapılan hastalarda memnuniyet değerlendirmesi

Pages
44–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although penil prosthesis surgery has successful results, all the patients do not feel the same satisfaction

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the satisfaction of the patients whom were implanted penil prosthesis for erectile dysfunction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Male Sexual Health Questionnaire MSHQ were applied to patients implanted penil prosthesis due to erectile dysfunction consisted of 6 questions with answers 1 to 5 1 Extremely Unsatisfied, 5 ExtremelySatisfied between October 2006 and August 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although penil prosthesis surgery has successful results, all the patients do not feel the same satisfaction
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Cinsel sağlık · erektil disfonksiyon · penil protez

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the satisfaction of the patients whom were implanted penil prosthesis for erectile dysfunction. Material and Methods: Male Sexual Health Questionnaire MSHQ were applied to patients implanted penil prosthesis due to erectile dysfunction consisted of 6 questions with answers 1 to 5 1 Extremely Unsatisfied, 5 ExtremelySatisfied between October 2006 and August 2012. Results: 22 of 33 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 55,6±10,9 35-71 years. Mean MSHQ score was 23 8-28 . MSHQ questions and answer samples are shown in table 1 and 2. Three and 4 patients answerded at least 1 question as, extremely unsatisfied and moderately unsatisfied respectively whereas 14 patients answered at least 1 question as extremely satisfied. No surgery complication and treatment failure. Conclusion: Although penil prosthesis surgery has successful results, all the patients do not feel the same satisfaction

Özet

Amaç: Erektil disfonksiyon nedeniyle penil protez implantasyonu yapılan hastaların tedaviden memnuniyetlerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ekim 2006-Ağustos 2012 tarihleri arasında erektil disfonksiyon nedeniyle penil protez implantasyonu yapılan hastalar 6 sorudan oluşan ve cevapları 1-5 arasında skorlanan 1: Son derece memnuniyetsiz-5: Son derece memnun Male Sexual Health Questionnaire MSHQ anketinin memnuniyet skalası ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Penil protez implantasyonu yapılan 33 Hastadan 22 si çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 55,6±10,9 35-71 yıldı. MSHQ anketinden elde edilen toplam skorun ortanca 23 8-28 olduğu saptandı. MSHQ anketinin soruları ve her bir soru için aynı olan cevap örneği tablo 1 ve 2 de gösterilmiştir. Cevaplarında her bir sorudan en az birinde “son derece memnuniyetsiz”, “kısmen memnun değil” yanıtı veren hasta sayısının sırasıyla 3 ve 4 olduğu; 14 hastanın en az bir soruya “son derece memnun” yanıtını verdiği gözlendi. Hastaların hiç birinde cerrahi komplikasyon ve tedavi başarısızlığı gözlenmedi. Sonuç: Penil protez implantasyonunun cerrahi başarısı yüksek olmakla birlikte hastaların hepsi tedavi sonrası aynı memnuniyete sahip değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, M. F., ARSLAN, M. E., ENER, K., ALTINOVA, S., GÖK, B., AKBULUT, Z. (2014). Satisfaction evaluation of the patients with penile prosthesis implantation. Yeni Üroloji Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 44–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/337400

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Evans C. The use of penile prostheses in the treatment of impotence. Br J Urol 1998;81:591-8.
  2. Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence: use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Uro- logy 1973;2:80–2.
  3. Hatzimouratidisand K, Hatzichristou DG. A comparative review of the options for treatment of erectile dysfunction: which treatment for which patient ? Drugs 2005;65:1621– 50. Mulcahy JJ, Austoni E, Barada JH, Choi HK, Hellstrom WJ, Krishnamurti S, et al. The penile implant for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2004;1:98-109. Montague DK. Penile prosthesis implantation in the era of medical treatment for erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am 2011;38:217-25. Martínez-Salamanca JI, Mueller A, Moncada I, Carbal- lido J, Mulhall JP. Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review. J Sex Med 2011;8:1880-9.
  4. Bernal RM, Henry GD. Contemporary patient satisfaction rates for three-piece inflatable penile prostheses. Adv Urol 2012;707321. Kramer AC, Schweber A. Patient expectations prior to co- loplast titan penile prosthesis implant predicts postopera- tive satisfaction. J Sex Med 2010;7:2261-6.
  5. Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Carmignani G, Corbu C, Campo B, Ordesi G, et al. AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2000;37:50-5.
  6. Porena M, Mearini L, Mearini E, Marzi M, Zucchi A. Pe- nile prosthesis implantation and couple’s satisfaction. Urol Int 1999;63:185-7.
  7. Anafarta K, Yaman O, Aydos K. Clinical experience with dynaflex penile prostheses in 120 patients. Urology 1998;52:1098–1100.
  8. Goldstein I, Newman L, Baum N, Brooks M, Chaikin L, Goldberg K et al. Safety and efficacy outcome of mentor alpha-1 inflatable penile prosthesis implantation for impo- tence treatment. J Urol 1997;3:833-9. Lledó García E, MoncadaIribarren I, JaraRascón J, Carre- ra Puerta C, González-Chamorro F, LlorenteAbarca C, et al. Treatment with sildenafil of cold glands syndrome after inflatable penile prosthesis. Actas Urol Esp 2004;28:443-6. Schover LR. Sex therapy for the penile prosthesis recipient. Urol Clin North Am 1989;16:91-8.
  9. Henry G, Houghton L, Culkin D, Otheguy J, Shabsigh R, Ohl DA. Comparison of a new length measurement tech- nique for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to stan- dard techniques: outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med 2011;8:2640-6.
  10. Bettocchi C, Palumbo F, Spilotros M, Lucarelli G, Palaz- zo S, Battaglia M, et al