Journals / Yeni Üroloji Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Port site metastasis in urological laparoscopic surgery: Review

Ürolojik laparoskopik cerrahide port yeri metastazı: Derleme

Pages
103–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The benefits of intraperitoneal or trocar-site irrigation with cytotoxic or immunomodulating agents are under investigation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Port site metastasis is a pathology that developing after laparoscopic procedures for malignancies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To our knowledge, 34 cases of port site metastasis have been reported in the urologic literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The benefits of intraperitoneal or trocar-site irrigation with cytotoxic or immunomodulating agents are under investigation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Port site metastasis is a pathology that developing after laparoscopic procedures for malignancies. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the incidence, pathophysiology and risk factors of port site metastasis after uro-oncological procedures. To our knowledge, 34 cases of port site metastasis have been reported in the urologic literature. Many factors contribute to port site metastasis and tumor seeding. The risk of port site metastasis will be remains low if surgeons severely adhere to the principles of oncological surgery. The benefits of intraperitoneal or trocar-site irrigation with cytotoxic or immunomodulating agents are under investigation.

Özet

Port yeri metastazı, malignitelerde uygulanan laparoskopik cerrahi sonrası gelişen bir patolojidir. Bu makalenin amacı üro-onkolojik prosedürler sonrası gelişen port yeri metastazının insidans, risk faktörü ve patofizyolojisini gözden geçirmektir. Bizim araştırmamıza göre ürolojik literatürde 34 port yeri metastazı vakası bildirilmiştir. Port yeri metastazında birçok faktör suçlanmaktadır. Operatör onkolojik cerrahi prensiplerine ciddiyetle uyarsa port yeri metastaz riski düşmektedir. Sitotoksik veya immünomodülatör ajanlarla intraperitoneal alanın veya trokar yerinin irrigasyonunun faydası halen araştırılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KİLCİLER, M., BOZKURT, Y. (2009). Port site metastasis in urological laparoscopic surgery: Review. Yeni Üroloji Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 103–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/337311

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Neuhaus SJ, Ellis T, Rofe AM, Pike GK, Jamieson GG, Watson DI. Tumor implantation following laparoscopy using different insufflation gases. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1300–2. 2.Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Schneider M, Gutt C. Tumor seeding following laparoscopy: international survey. World J Surg 1999; 23: 989–97. 3.Lee SW, Gleason NR, Bessler M, Whelan RL. Peritoneal irrigation with povidone-iodine solution after laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy significantly decreases port-tumor recurrence in a murine model. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 319–26. 4.Dobronte Z, Wittmann T, Karascony G. Rapid development of malignant metastases in the abdominal wall after laparoscopy. Endoscopy 1978; 10: 127–30. 5.Bangma C, Kirkels WJ, Chadha S, Schröder FH. Cutaneous metastasis following laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 1995; 153: 1635–6. 6.Curet MJ. Port site metastases. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 705–12. 7.Ramirez PT, Wolf JK, Levenback C. Laparoscopic port-site metastases: etiology and prevention. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 179–89. 8.Ziprin P, Ridgway PF, Peck DH, Darzi AW. The theories and realities of port-site metastases: a critical appraisal. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195: 395–408. 9.Tsivian A, Sidi A. Port site metastasis in urological laparoscopic surgery. J Urol 2003; 169: 1213–8. 10.Rassweiler J, Tsivian A, Ravi Kumbar AV, Lymberakis C, Schulze M, Seeman O et al. Oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancy: experience with more than 1,000 operations. J Urol 2003; 169: 2072–5. 11.Micali S, Celia A, Bove P, De Stefani S, Sighinolfi MC, Kavoussi LR et al. Tumor seeding in urological laparoscopy: an international survey. J Urol 2004; 171: 2151–4. 12.Stolla V, Rossi D, Bladou F, Rattier C, Ayuso D, Serment G et al. Subcutaneous metastasis after coelioscopic lymphadenectomy for vesical urotheial carcinoma. Eur Urol 1994; 26: 342–3. 13.Andersen JR, Steven K, Smith AD. Implantation metastasis after laparoscopic biopsy of bladder cancer. J Urol 1995; 153: 1047–8. 14.Altieri V, D’Armiento M, Desio M. Can laparoscopic lymphadenectomy disseminate bladder cancer? Acta Urol Ital 1998; 12: 231–3. 15.Ahmed I, Shaikh NA, Kapadia CR. Track recurrence of renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma after laparoscopic nephrectomy. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 319. 16.Otani M, Irie S, Tsuji Y. Port site metastasis after laparoscopic nephrectomy: unsuspected transitional cell carcinoma within a tuberculous atrophic kidney. J Urol 1999;162: 486–7. 17.Fentie DD,