SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yeni Üroloji Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of the caudal block anesthesia and ıntrarectal gel anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal disorders

Anorektal hastalığı olan hastalarda transrektal prostat biyopsisi için yapılan kaudal blok ve intrarektal jel anestezilerinin etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması

Mehmet YÜCEL
ŞAHİN KABAY
Levent ŞAHİN
Tayfun AYDIN
Tayfun CÜCİOĞLU
Pages
45–49
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A self-administration visual analogue scale VAS was used to assess the pain score during anesthesia, during probe insertion and during prostate biopsy.Results: The mean VAS score during the probe insertion and during the prostate biopsies is lower in group 1 than group 2, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We compared the analgesic efficacy of the caudal block anesthesia and intrarectal gel anesthesia for TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal disorders.Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients which had anorectal disorders undergoing biopsy were entered into this study. 15 ml of lidocaine 1% lidocaine was into the caudal space in caudal group first 50 patients and 15 cc 2% lidocaine gel were applied intrarectally in intrarectal gel group last 50 patients 10 minutes before the prostate biopsy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: We compared the analgesic efficacy of the caudal block anesthesia and intrarectal gel anesthesia for TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal disorders.Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients which had anorectal disorders undergoing biopsy were entered into this study. 15 ml of lidocaine 1% lidocaine was into the caudal space in caudal group first 50 patients and 15 cc 2% lidocaine gel were applied intrarectally in intrarectal gel group last 50 patients 10 minutes before the prostate biopsy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A self-administration visual analogue scale VAS was used to assess the pain score during anesthesia, during probe insertion and during prostate biopsy.Results: The mean VAS score during the probe insertion and during the prostate biopsies is lower in group 1 than group 2, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kaudal blok · intrarektal jel · prostat biyopsisi

Abstract

Objective: We compared the analgesic efficacy of the caudal block anesthesia and intrarectal gel anesthesia for TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal disorders.Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients which had anorectal disorders undergoing biopsy were entered into this study. 15 ml of lidocaine 1% lidocaine was into the caudal space in caudal group first 50 patients and 15 cc 2% lidocaine gel were applied intrarectally in intrarectal gel group last 50 patients 10 minutes before the prostate biopsy. A self-administration visual analogue scale VAS was used to assess the pain score during anesthesia, during probe insertion and during prostate biopsy.Results: The mean VAS score during the probe insertion and during the prostate biopsies is lower in group 1 than group 2, p

Özet

Giriş: Anorektal hastalığı olan TRUS eşliğinde prostat biyopsisi yapılan hastalarda kaudal blok ve intrarektal jel anestezisinin analjezik etkinliğini karşılaştırdık.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya anorektal hastalığı olan ve TRUS eşliğinde biyopsi yapılan toplam 100 hasta alındı. Kaudal grupta 15 ml lidocaine %1 lidocaine kaudal boşluğa uygulandı 50 hasta ve intrarektal grupta prostat biyopsisinden 15 dakika önce 15 cc %2 lidocaine jel intrarektal olarak uygulandı 50 hasta . Anestezi işlemi sırasında, prob yerleştirme sırasında ve prostat biyopsisi sırasında ağrı skorunun ölçmek için hastanın kendi yaptığı visual analog skala VAS uygulandı.Bulgular: Prob yerleştirme sırasında ve prostat biyopsi sırasında ölçülen ortalama VAS skorları Grup 1’de Grup 2’ye göre daha düşüktü p

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCEL, M., KABAY, Ş., ŞAHİN, L., AYDIN, T., CÜCİOĞLU, T. (2013). Comparison of the caudal block anesthesia and ıntrarectal gel anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal disorders. Yeni Üroloji Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 45–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/337250

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Seymour H, Perry MJ, Lee-Elliot C, Dundas D, Patel U. Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: the advantages of periprostatic local anaesthesia. BJU Int 2001; 88:540-544.
  2. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, Gremmo E, Doré B, Aubert J. Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Br J Urol 1997; 79:608-610.
  3. Cevik I, Dillioglugil O, Zisman A, Akdas A. Combined “pe- riprostatic and periapical” local anesthesia is not superior to “periprostatic” anesthesia alone in reducing pain during Tru-Cut prostate biopsy. Urology 2006; 68:1215-1219.
  4. Ikuerowo SO, Popoola AA, Olapade-Olaopa EO, et al. Cau- dal block anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. Int Urol Nephrol 2010; 42:19-22.
  5. Adebamowo CA, Ladipo JK, Ajao OG. Randomized com- parison of agents for caudal anaesthesia in anal surgery. Br J Surg 1996; 83:364-365. Adebamowo CA. Caudal anaesthesia in the clinical as- sessment of painful anal lesions. Afr J Med Med Sci 2000; 29:133-134.
  6. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R, Shinohara K. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systema- tic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 1996; 155:607-609.
  7. Aus G, Hermansson CG, Hugosson J, Pedersen KV. Trans- rectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: complicati- ons and acceptance by patients. Br J Urol 1993; 71:457-459.
  8. Chang SS, Alberts G, Wells N, Smith JA Jr, Cookson MS. Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: re- sults of a prospective double-blind randomized trial. J Urol 2001; 166:2178-2180.
  9. Kravchick S, Yoffe B, Cytron S. Modified perianal/pericap- sular anesthesia for transrectal biopsy of prostate in patients with anal rectal problems. Urology 2007; 69:139-141.
  10. Kabay S, Yucel M, Sahin L, Yaylak F, Aydin T. Caudal block anaesthesia for transrectal biopsy of prostate in patients with anal rectal disorders. Central European Journal of Uro- logy 2009; 62;18-20. Rodríguez LV, Terris MK. Risks and complications of trans- rectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a pros- pective study and review of the literature. J Urol 1998: 160:2115-2120.
  11. Peters JL, Thompson AC, McNicholas TA, Hines JE, Han- bury DC, Boustead GB. Increased patient satisfaction from transrectal ultrasonography and biopsy under sedation. BJU Int 2001; 87:827-830.
  12. Desgrandchamps F, Meria P, Irani J, Desgrippes A, Teillac P, Le Duc A. The rectal administration of lidocaine gel and tolerance of transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate: a prospective rand