Journals / Yerbilimleri / 2015 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity

Pages
121–136
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Concerning the constant ratio between the two shear strengths, namely the one at the plastic limit to the one at the liquid limit, it was found that this ratio is a constant, but it increases with the increase in soil plasticity.Keywords: Undrained shear strength, soil plasticity, vane shear test, mud press method, remolded soils.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Undrained shear strength (su) is one of the key geotechnical parameters for both natural and remolded soils.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There has been a long-lasting debate as to whether the su at the plastic and liquid limits are constant and whether the ratio of the su at the plastic limit to the su at the liquid limit is mostly fixed to 100.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Concerning the constant ratio between the two shear strengths, namely the one at the plastic limit to the one at the liquid limit, it was found that this ratio is a constant, but it increases with the increase in soil plasticity.Keywords: Undrained shear strength, soil plasticity, vane shear test, mud press method, remolded soils.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Drenajsız kesme dayanımı · zemin plastikliği · kanatlı kesme deneyi

Özet

Undrained shear strength (su) is one of the key geotechnical parameters for both natural and remolded soils. While it is basically a function of water content, it is also related to soil plasticity. There has been a long-lasting debate as to whether the su at the plastic and liquid limits are constant and whether the ratio of the su at the plastic limit to the su at the liquid limit is mostly fixed to 100. While this view is embraced by a great majority of researchers, some proclaim that the range of both the su at the plastic limit (PL) and the su at the liquid limit (LL) is rather wide; therefore, constant values of the su cannot be assigned for either the PL or the LL. Accordingly, the view that there is a constant ratio between the two shear strengths is invalid. The scope of this investigation is to reassess this problem using the laboratory vane shear test (VST) along with a new supplementary tool, the mud-press machine (MPM). Sixty remolded soil samples were employed as the study material. The variation of soil strength at both the plastic and liquid limit is investigated using the VST and MPM methods. While the VST method does not portray a distinctive relationship between the su and the two Atterberg limits, the newly introduced MPM method clearly shows that there is a meaningful relationship between the extrusion force, which is considered akin to the undrained shear strength, at the Atterberg limits and the two consistency limits, particularly the liquid limit. Concerning the constant ratio between the two shear strengths, namely the one at the plastic limit to the one at the liquid limit, it was found that this ratio is a constant, but it increases with the increase in soil plasticity.Keywords: Undrained shear strength, soil plasticity, vane shear test, mud press method, remolded soils.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYABALI, K., AKTÜRK, Ö., FENER, M., ÜSTÜN, A. B., DİKMEN, O., HARPUTLUGİL, F. H. (2015). Evaluation of Undrained Shear Strength of Fine-Grained Soils in Consideration of Soil Plasticity. Yerbilimleri, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 3, 121–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/336582

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ASTM, 2000. Standard test method for labora- tory miniature vane shear test for satu- rated fine-grained soil. ASTM Standard D4648-00. American Society for Tes- ting and Materials (ASTM), West Cons- hohocken, PA. American Society for Testing Materials, 2001. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318-00 West Conshohocken, PA. Arrowsmith, E. J., 1978. Roadwork fills – a ma- terial engineer’s viewpoint. Proc. Clay Fills Conf., ICE, London, 25-36.
  2. Belviso, R., Ciampoli, S., Cotecchia, V., and Fe- derico, A., 1985. Use of the cone penet- rometer to determine consistency limits. Ground Engineering, 18(5), 21-22.
  3. Bozozuk, M., 1972. Downdrag measurements on a 160-ft floating pipe test pile in ma- rine clay. Canadian Geotechnical Jour- nal, 9(2), 127-136. British Standards Institution, 1990. British stan- dard methods of test for soils for en- gineering purposes, BS 1377: Milton Keynes, British Standards Institution. Dennehy, J. P., 1978. The remoulded undrained shear strength of cohesive soils and its influence on the suitability of embank- ment fill. Proc. Clay Fills Conf., ICE, London, 87-94.
  4. Federico, A., 1983. Relationships (c–w) and u (c–s) for remolded clayey soils at high water content. Riv. Ital. Geotech., 17(1), 38-41.
  5. Houlsby, G. T., 1982. Theoretical analysis of the fall cone test. Geotechnique, 32(2), 111-118.
  6. Karlsson, R., 1977. Consistency limits. A Manu- al for the Performance and Interpretati- on of Laboratory Investigations, Part 6, Sweden Counc. Bldg. Res. Kayabali K. and Tufenkci, O. O., 2010. Undrai- ned shear strength of remolded soils at consistency limits: Canadian Geotech- nical Journal, 47(3), 259-266.
  7. Kvalstad, T. J., Farrokh, N., Kaynia, A. M., Mok- kelbost, K. H., and Byrn, P., 2005. Soil conditions and slope stability in the Or- men Large area. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 22(1-2), 299-310.
  8. Lee, L. T. and Freeman, R. B., 2007. An alter- native test method for assessing con- sistency limits. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 30(4), 1-8.
  9. Locat, J. and Demers, D., 1988. Viscosity, yield stress, remolded strength, and liquidity index relationships for sensitive clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 25(4), 799-806.
  10. Medhat, F. and Whyte, I. L., 1986. An appraisal of soil index tests. Geological Society, Engineering Geology Special Publicati- on, 2, 317-323.
  11. Nagaraj, H. B., Sridharan, A. and Mallikarjuna, H. M., 2012. Re-examination of undra- ined strength at Attergerg limits water contents: