Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 9

Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Inulin on Growth Performance, Digestion Enzyme Activities and Antioxidant Status of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Pages
1344–1353
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Apart from pepsin activity, results indicated that dietary supplementation of inulin is beneficial and may also have differential effects upon digestive enzyme activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study investigated the effects of the prebiotic inulin on the growth parameters, digestive enzyme activities and antioxidant status of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).
📊
Key Findings & Data:After acclimation, fish (34±0.22 g; n = 135) were assigned into 9 tanks (15 fish per tank) and triplicate groups were fed a control diet (G-0) or diets containing 1% (G-1) or 2% (G-2) inulin.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Apart from pepsin activity, results indicated that dietary supplementation of inulin is beneficial and may also have differential effects upon digestive enzyme activities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The present study investigated the effects of the prebiotic inulin on the growth parameters, digestive enzyme activities and antioxidant status of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). After acclimation, fish (34±0.22 g; n = 135) were assigned into 9 tanks (15 fish per tank) and triplicate groups were fed a control diet (G-0) or diets containing 1% (G-1) or 2% (G-2) inulin. At the end of the trial (8 weeks), growth factors (final weight, weight gain, specific growth rate (SGR), food conversion ratio (FCR), protein efficiency ratio (PER), Economic conversion ratio (ECR), digestive enzyme activities (pepsin, trypsin, amylase and lipase) and antioxidant status superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and malondialdehyde (MDA) level of liver tissue were assessed. At the end of the study highest survival rate was observed in the fish fed with 1% G-1 inulin group. Similarly, digestive enzyme activities were significantly higher dietary G-1 group. Subsequently, elevated growth performance (final weight, SGR and FCR) was observed in trout fed with 1% compared to the control group. The effect of the dietary inulin on digestion was partly observed by assaying the activity of pepsin, intestinal amylase, trypsin and lipase. Apart from pepsin activity, results indicated that dietary supplementation of inulin is beneficial and may also have differential effects upon digestive enzyme activities. Antioxidant enzyme activity of SOD and CAT in liver tissue was generally higher in the supplemented inulin diets than in the control and significantly higher in the 1% inulin group. A significant decrease in MDA level of tissue was observed in all inulin supplemented groups when compared to the control group. These results indicate that inulin be considered as a beneficial dietary supplement for growth performance, digestive enzyme activities and antioxidant status of rainbow trout.

🔖

Cite This Article

HUNT, A., ÇETİNKAYA, M., YILMAZ, F., YILDIRIM, M., BERKÖZ, M., YALIN, S. (2019). Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Inulin on Growth Performance, Digestion Enzyme Activities and Antioxidant Status of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 9, 1344–1353. https://ajindex.com/articles/336382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aebi H. 1974. Catalase. In: Bergmayer H.U. (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis. Academic Press, NewYork, 671-684 pp. Akrami R, Iri Y, Rostami, HK, Mansour MR. 2013. Effect of dietary supplementation of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) on growth performance, survival, lactobacillus bacterial population and hemato-immunological parameters of stellate sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus) juvenile. Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 35: 1235-1239. AOAC 1990. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists, (Edited by Kenneth Helrich) 15th ed. Bailey J, Blankenship L, Cox N. 1991. Effect of fructooligosaccharide on Salmonella colonization of the chicken intestine. Poultry Science, 70: 2433-2438.
  2. Benjakul S, Visessanguan W, Thummaratwasik P. 2000. Isolation and characterization of trypsin inhibitors from some Thai legume seeds. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 24: 107-127. Bernfeld P. 1955. Amylases, α and β. Methods in Enzymology, 1: 149-158.
  3. Binaii M, Ghiasi M, Farabi SMV, Pourgholam R, Fazli H, Safari R, Alavi SE, Taghavi MJ, Bankehsaz Z. 2014. Biochemical and hemato-immunological parameters in juvenile beluga (Huso huso) following the diet supplemented with nettle (Urtica dioica). Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 36: 46-51. Bongers A, van den Heuvel EGHM. 2003. Prebiotics and the bioavailability of minerals and trace elements. Food Reviews International, 19: 397-422.
  4. Breves G, Sztkuti L, Schrder B. 2001. Effects on oligosaccharides on functional parameters of the intestinal tract of growing pigs. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrifte, 108: 246-248.
  5. Burr G, Gatlin DM, Hume M. 2009. Effects of the prebiotics GroBiotic® -A and inulin on the intestinal microbiota of red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus. Journal of World Aquaculture Society, 40(4): 440-449.
  6. Causey JL, Slain JL, Tangled BC, Meyer PD. 1998. Stimulation of human immune system by inulin in vitro. Proc of Danone Conference on Probiotics and Immunity, Bonn, Germany. Denav S, Stayko Y, Moutafchieva R, Beev G. 2009. Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract of fish and the potential application of probiotics and prebiotics in finfish aquaculture. International Aquatic Research, 1: 1-29. Dehaghani PG. Baboli MJ. Taghavi AM. Ziaei-Nejad S. Pourfarhadi M. 2015. Effect of synbiotic dietary supplementation on survival, growth performance, and digestive enzyme activities of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 60(5): 224-232.
  7. Dimitroglou A, Merrifield DL, Moate