SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 12

Effects of The Use of Colored Cover Materials and Led Lighting in Greenhouses on Plant Nutrient Concentration: Case of Tomato Plant (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Atılgan ATILGAN
İbrahim ERDAL
HAKAN AKTAŞ
Eren ÇETİN
Pages
2550–2555
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, considering the effects of four different greenhouse treatments on macro and micronutrient nutritions SPAD values, and yield values, it was concluded that the most suitable treatments for tomato cultivation in greenhouses is BlueG treatment and RedG treatment should not be ignored.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of four different color plastic greenhouse treatments on nutrient concentrations of leaf and fruit, leaf SPAD (Soil and Plant Analyzer Development) values and some yield parameters of tomato were tried to be determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The used plastic greenhouses are 3 m in width, 6 m in length, 2 m in sidewall height and 2.8 m in roof ridge height.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, considering the effects of four different greenhouse treatments on macro and micronutrient nutritions SPAD values, and yield values, it was concluded that the most suitable treatments for tomato cultivation in greenhouses is BlueG treatment and RedG treatment should not be ignored.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, the effects of four different color plastic greenhouse treatments on nutrient concentrations of leaf and fruit, leaf SPAD (Soil and Plant Analyzer Development) values and some yield parameters of tomato were tried to be determined. For this purpose, plastic greenhouses with Red (RedG), Blue (BlueG), Colorless (ConG) and white Led (LedG) lighting have been used as materials in the research. The used plastic greenhouses are 3 m in width, 6 m in length, 2 m in sidewall height and 2.8 m in roof ridge height. Led lighting is; Three hours of extra lighting is planned for one hour before sunrise, 2 hours after sunset. The research was carried out in ISUBU (Isparta), Faculty of Agriculture, field area in the summer season in 2019. The nutrient elements of K, Ca, Mg, P, Cu, Zn, Mn and Fe were determined in the leaf and of the tomato plant. It has been determined that four different greenhouse treatments have a positive effect on K, Ca, Cu, Zn, Fe nutrients in leaf, and K, Ca, P, Mg nutrient in fruit. In terms of SPAD values, all treatments were determined to be higher than the control treatment. It was determined that the highest SPAD value was in BlueG treatment. When the efficiency-related values are examined; It was determined that the highest fruit number, fruit weight and yield were in BlueG treatment. BlueG treatment was followed by RedG, ConG, and LedG treatment respectively in terms of efficiency. As a result, considering the effects of four different greenhouse treatments on macro and micronutrient nutritions SPAD values, and yield values, it was concluded that the most suitable treatments for tomato cultivation in greenhouses is BlueG treatment and RedG treatment should not be ignored.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATILGAN, A., ERDAL, İ., AKTAŞ, H., ÇETİN, E. (2020). Effects of The Use of Colored Cover Materials and Led Lighting in Greenhouses on Plant Nutrient Concentration: Case of Tomato Plant (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 12, 2550–2555. https://ajindex.com/articles/336161

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Aktas H, Söylemez S, Pakyurek AY, 2009. Effect of different pruning systems on bell pepper (Capsicum annuum l.) growing in greenhouse. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture of Harran University 13(3): 31-36.
  2. Allison LE, Moodie CD. 1965. Carbonate. In: C.A. Black et al (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agronomy 9: 1379-1400. American Society of Agronomy Inc. Madison, Wisconsin. USA. Andriolo JL, Streck NA, Buriol GA, Ludke L, Duarte TS. 1998. Growth, development and dry matter distribution of a tomato crop as affected by environment. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 73: 125-130. Bergmann W, 1999. Nutritional Disorders of Plants: Development, Visual and Analytical Diagnosis, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, pp741. Bouyoucos GL. 1951. A Recalibration of the hydrometer for making mechanical analysis of soil, Agronomy journal 43(9):434-438. Caliman FRB, da Silva, DJH, Stringheta PC, Fontes, PCR, Moreira. GR, Mantovani EC. 2010. Quality of tomatoes grown under a protected environment and field conditions. Idesia (Chile) 28:75-82. Campbell CR. 2000. Reference sufficiency ranges for plant analysis in the southern region of the US. Southern cooperative series bulletin 394, updated and reformatted July 2009 http://www.clemson.edu/ sera6/scsb394notoc.pdf Ceylan Ş, Mordoğan N, Yoldaş F, Yağmur, B. 2001. Azotlu gübrelemenin domates bitkisinde verim, azot birikimi ve besin element içeriği üzerine etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(2-3):103-110.
  3. Dorais M. Papadopoulos, AP, Gosselin A. 2001. Greenhouse tomato fruit quality. Horticultural Reviews. 26: 239-319.
  4. Dumas Y, Dadomo M, Di Lucca G, Grolier P. 2003. Effects of environmental factors and agricultural techniques on antioxidant content of tomatoes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 83:369-382. Erdal Í, Türkmen R, Akgün A. 2016.
  5. Variations in chlorophyll, SPAD values and some nutrient concentrations depending on chlorosis in peach leaves. Lucrări Ştiinţifice, 59:13-16.
  6. Ergun V, Aktas H. 2018. Effect of grafting on yield and fruit quality of pepper (Capsicum annuum) grown under open field conditions. Scientific Papers. Series B, Horticulture. Vol. LXII:463-466.
  7. Ildir İ, Aktas H. 2018. Effect of Different Type of Pruning on the Yield and Quality of Greenhouse Tomato Production. Süleyman Demirel University, Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences. 22(3):1241-1248 Jackson ML. 1967. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited. New Delhi. Jones Jr JB, Wol