Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 11

The Influence of Different Ripening Stages, Harvest and Drying Methods on Quality of Unsulfured Sun-Dried Apricots

Pages
2397–2404
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that different harvesting periods, methods and drying methods significantly affected almost all fruit quality parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out between 2017 and 2018 to determine physical and chemical influences of two drying methods (drying on wooden fruit drying trays and drying cloths), two harvesting periods (commercial / physiological maturity and late harvest), and two harvesting methods (harvesting by hand and shaking) on dried fruit samples of Hacıhaliloğlu and Kabaaşı cultivars.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results indicated that different harvesting periods, methods and drying methods significantly affected almost all fruit quality parameters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, it was concluded that in sun-dried apricot production, harvesting at late period and the drying on trays positively affected various quality parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study was carried out between 2017 and 2018 to determine physical and chemical influences of two drying methods (drying on wooden fruit drying trays and drying cloths), two harvesting periods (commercial / physiological maturity and late harvest), and two harvesting methods (harvesting by hand and shaking) on dried fruit samples of Hacıhaliloğlu and Kabaaşı cultivars. Titrable acidity, browning level, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity (ABTS), color (L*, a*, b*), pH, humidity and water activity (aw) parameters of dried fruit samples were examined. Results indicated that different harvesting periods, methods and drying methods significantly affected almost all fruit quality parameters. L value was higher in apricots dried on trays than dried on the cloths. L* values of dried apricots ranged from 27,13 to 54,74. Similarly, moisture content and water activity values were also found to be lower in apricots dried on wooden fruit drying trays than dried on clothes. When chemical parameters were examined, it was observed that phenolic compounds and total antioxidant contents decreased with fruit ripening. The effect of the applications on drying efficiency was not determined as significant, on the contrary, the individual weights of the dried apricots harvested at the late period were found significantly higher and the number of dried apricots per kilogram was lower. As a result of the study, it was concluded that in sun-dried apricot production, harvesting at late period and the drying on trays positively affected various quality parameters.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOBAN, E., KARLIDAĞ, H., KUTSAL, İ. K. (2020). The Influence of Different Ripening Stages, Harvest and Drying Methods on Quality of Unsulfured Sun-Dried Apricots. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 11, 2397–2404. https://ajindex.com/articles/336138

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Abdelhaq EH, Labuza TP. 1987. Air Drying Characteristics of Apricots. Journal of Food Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2621.1987.tb06608.x Akin EB, Karabulut I, Topcu A. 2008. Some compositional properties of main Malatya apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) varieties. Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.foodchem.2007.08.052 Anonymous 1992. Dried Apricot Standards of Turkish Statistical Institute. Ankara, Türkiye. Anonymous, 2014. Apricot Workshop Report, website: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/Belgeler/Duyurula r/kayisimail.pdf Asma BM, Akça Y. 1996. Hacıhaliloğlu Kayısı Çeşidinde Derim Zamanının Kuru Kayısı Kalitesi ve Randımanı Üzerine Etkisinin Saptanması Üzerine Bir Araştırma, YYÜ Ziraat Fak. Der, 6(1): 181-189. Asma BM. 2000. Apricot Growing. Evin Publishing (in Turkish). Asma BM, Ozturk K. 2005. Analysis of morphological, pomological and yield characteristics of some apricot germplasm in Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-003-1384-5.
  2. Baloch AK, Buckle KA, Edwards RA. 1973. Measurement of non‐enzymicbrowning of dehydratedcarrot. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jsfa.2740240406 Bennett LE, Jegasothy H, Konczak I, Frank D, Sudharmarajan S, Clingeleffer PR. 2011. Total polyphenolicsand anti-oxidant properties of selected dried fruits and relation ships to drying conditions. Journal of Functional Foods. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jff.2011.03.005 Bolat I, Karlidaǧ H. 1999. The effects of harves tperiods on SO2 content and fruitquality of Turkish dried apricot. Acta Horticulturae.https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.488. 99 Cemeroğlu B. 2010. General Methods in Food Analysis. Gıda Teknolojisi Derneği Yayınları.
  3. Cemeroğlu B, Özkan M. 2009. Fruit and Vegetable Processing Technology. Grup Publishing. Cuvelier ME, Berset C. 2005. Phenolic compounds and plante xtracts protect paprika against UV-induceddiscoloration. International Journal of Food Scienceand Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00909.x FAO, 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ faostat/en/#data/QC [Accessed 22May 2020]
  4. Feldsine P, Abeyta C, Andrews WH. 2002. AOAC International methods committee guidelines for validation of qualitative and quantitative food microbiological official methods of analysis. Journal of AOAC International. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jaoac/85.5.1187 Güçlü K, Altun M, Özyürek M, Karademir SE,