SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4

A CONTENT ANALYSIS ON THE REASONS OF ENTERPRENEURIAL CAREER INTENTION AND EFFECTS OF THE ENTREPRENEURSHIP COURSE: THE CASE OF KTMU

.GİRİŞİMCİLİK KARİYERİNE YÖNELİM NEDENLERİ VE GİRİŞİMCİLİK DERSİNİN ETKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR İÇERİK ANALİZİ: KTMÜ ÖRNEĞİ

Cemal SEZER
Pages
63–86
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also among the causes of entrepreneurial intention scope, content and priority differences observed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is finding out the career intention, and determines the causes which effect their entrepreneurial intentions of business department students taking entrepreneurship course or not.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An additional objective is to develop and continue an earlier research published before (*).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also among the causes of entrepreneurial intention scope, content and priority differences observed
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar kavramlar: Girişimcilik · girişimcilik kariyeri · girişimcilik kariyerine yönelim

Abstract

The aim of this research is finding out the career intention, and determines the causes which effect their entrepreneurial intentions of business department students taking entrepreneurship course or not. An additional objective is to develop and continue an earlier research published before (*). The study is limited by participation and ideas of business department students of KyrgyzstanTurkey Manas University (KTMU). A form used for the study consists of two parts. By using this form, requirement data related demographic information and career intention and reasons that affect their entrepreneurial intentions were collected. The texts were prepared for analysing. The result of analysis, entrepreneurial career intention of students taking the course was a big difference between other students’ intentions. Also among the causes of entrepreneurial intention scope, content and priority differences observed

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, girişimcilik kariyerine yönelim ve nedenlerini öğrencilerin girişimcilik dersi alıp almama durumlarına göre belirlemek ve ortaya çıkarmaktır. Ayrıca, bu konuda daha önce yapılmış ve yayınlanmış bir çalışmayı (*) devam ettirerek geliştirmektir. Araştırma, Kırgızistan-Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi (KTMÜ) işletme bölümü öğrencilerinin katılımı ve görüşleriyle sınırlıdır. Araştırma için iki bölümden oluşan bir form kullanılmıştır. Katılımcıların demografik bilgileri, kariyer yönelimleri ve girişimcilik kariyerine yönelim nedenlerine ilişkin veriler toplanmış; analiz için gerekli metinler oluşturulmuştur. Analiz sonucu, girişimcilik dersi alan öğrencilerin girişimcilik kariyerine yönelimi ile almayanların yönelimi arasında büyük bir fark bulunmuştur. Ayrıca girişimciliğe yönelme nedenleri arasında kapsam, içerik ve öncelik farkları olduğu görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZER, C. (2013). A CONTENT ANALYSIS ON THE REASONS OF ENTERPRENEURIAL CAREER INTENTION AND EFFECTS OF THE ENTREPRENEURSHIP COURSE: THE CASE OF KTMU. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 63–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/3361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Buhler, P.M. (2002).
  2. Human Resources Management, FW Publikcations, Inc. Avon USA. Bingöl, D. (2010).
  3. İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Beta Yayınları,
  4. İstanbul.
  5. Campbell, D.P. ve Holland, J.L. (1972) A Merger in Vocational Interest research: Applying Holland's Theory to Strong's Data, Journal of Vocational Behavior,Vol. 2, 4, 353–376.
  6. Crabree, P.D. ve Hales, L.W. (1974). Holland’ Hexagonal Model Applied to Rural Youth, The Vocational Guidence Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 11, 218-223.
  7. Demirel, E.T. ve Tikici, M. (2004).
  8. Kültürün Girişimciliğe Etkileri, Doğu Anadolu Bölgeleri Araştırmaları, 49-58.
  9. Gardner, J.N., Jewler, J. ve Barefoot, B.D.(2008) Step by Step to Collage and Career Success, Thomson Wadsworth, Boston. USA. Graneheim, U.H. and Lundnan, B. (2004). Qualitative Content Analysis In Nursing, Research: Concepts, Procedures and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness, Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112.
  10. Green, W.S. (2009). Enterprenurship in the Mainstream, 15-20, In: Handbook of Universities-wide Entrepreneurship Education (Edt. G.P. West, E.G. Gatewood ve K.G. Shaver) Elward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenhan, UK. Guzman, J. Ve Linan, F. (2005). Perspective on Entreprenurial Education: A US-Europe Comparasion, Jean Monnet Europen Studies Centre, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija. Hussmanns, R., Mehran, F. ve Verna, V. (1992). Survey of Economically Active Population, An ILO Manuel On Concepts and Methods, International Labour Office, Genava, Switzerland. Kumar, R. (2011). HRM Strategic Analysis Text and Cases, International Publishing House Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, India. Krueger, N.F., & Brazeal, D.V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91– 104.In: Giacomin, O., Janssen, F., Pruett, M., Shinnar, R.S., Llopis, F., ve Toney, B. (2011). içinde: Entrepreneurial intentions, motivations and barriers: Differences Among American, Asian and European students, International Entrepreneurship Managament Journal, (2011) 7, 219–238.
  11. Longenecker, J.G., Moore, C.W., Petty, J.W. ve Palich, L.E. (2006). Small Business Management An Entrepreneurial Emphhasis, Souyh- Western, Inc., Ohio, USA. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. Princeton, New Jersey, USA. NSKKR, Natsionalni Statiticeski Komitet Kırgızskoy Respubliki, Maloya i Sredniy Pridprinimatelstvo v Kırgızıskoy Respublike, (2007- 2011).
  12. NSKKR, Natsionalni Statiticeski Komitet Kırgızskoy Respubliki, Metodologiya