Journals / Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni / 2013 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4

Intrauterine Device İn Small Bowel Mesenterium: A Rare Case Report.

İncebarsak Mezosunda RIA: Nadir Bir Olgu

Pages
205–207
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this report we present a case who was applied an IUD on the postpartum 30th day and referred to our clinic with abdominal pain two days later.The explorational surgery revealed the IUD stuck in jejunal mesenterium 150 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The dislocation of an intrauterine device (IUD) by perforating the uterus is a rare but serious complication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although laceration of neighbouring organs is possible, the migration of IUD to the jejunal mesenterium in the fifth day of application (and probable perforation) is an extreme example of this rare situation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this report we present a case who was applied an IUD on the postpartum 30th day and referred to our clinic with abdominal pain two days later.The explorational surgery revealed the IUD stuck in jejunal mesenterium 150 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The dislocation of an intrauterine device (IUD) by perforating the uterus is a rare but serious complication. Although laceration of neighbouring organs is possible, the migration of IUD to the jejunal mesenterium in the fifth day of application (and probable perforation) is an extreme example of this rare situation. In this report we present a case who was applied an IUD on the postpartum 30th day and referred to our clinic with abdominal pain two days later.The explorational surgery revealed the IUD stuck in jejunal mesenterium 150 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve.

Özet

Rahim içi araçların uterusu perfore edip uterus dışına çıkmaları ciddi ancak nadir bir durumdur. Komşu organ laserasyonları görülebilirse de uygulamanın (ve muhtemelen uterin perforasyonun) 5. gününde incebarsak mezosuna dek ilerlemesi bu nadir durumun uç bir örneğidir. Bu bildiride doğum sonrası 30. günde RIA takılmasının 2. gü- nünde karında ağrı şikayeti ile başvuran ve kayıp RIA ileoçekal valvden 150 cm. proksimalde, jejenum mezosu içinde bulunan hasta sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOLGUN, Z. N., ASLANOVA, R., TURHAN, E., SAYIN, N. C. (2013). Intrauterine Device İn Small Bowel Mesenterium: A Rare Case Report.. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 205–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/335723

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Sharifiaghdas F, Beigi FM, Abdi H. Laparoscopic removal of a migrated intrauterine device. Urol J. 2007;4:177–9. (PubMed
  2. Mulayim B, Mulayim S, Celik NY. A lost intrauterine device. Guess where we found it and how it happened? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006;11:47–9
  3. Key TC, Kreutner AK. Gastrointestinal complications of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55:239 – 44
  4. Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. Part 1. Obstet Gynecol Surg 1981;36:335–53
  5. Chih-Ping Chen, Tzu-Chi Hsu, and Wayseen Wang. Ileal Penetration by a Multiload-Cu 375􏱏Intrauterine Contraceptive Device A Case Report With Review of the Literature.