Journals / Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni / 2017 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

Effect of Internet Addiction on Life Quality of Future Healthcare Professionals

Geleceğin Sağlik Profesyonellerinde İnternet Bağimliliğinin Yaşam Kaliteleri Üzerine Etkisi

Pages
44–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the scope of the research students' IAS point average was 30.77±15.70.Conclusion: The health professionals are average internet user.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study, It is planned for purposes to assess the impact of internet addiction onto life quality of future health professionals.Material and Methods: Students studying for a private university department of health (296 people) created the universe of descriptive study of the type in January 2015.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the surveyed, 286 students who in school and agreed to participate in the study has been sampling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the scope of the research students' IAS point average was 30.77±15.70.Conclusion: The health professionals are average internet user.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study, It is planned for purposes to assess the impact of internet addiction onto life quality of future health professionals.Material and Methods: Students studying for a private university department of health (296 people) created the universe of descriptive study of the type in January 2015. In the surveyed, 286 students who in school and agreed to participate in the study has been sampling. The research data; was collected with the implementation of the survey consists of Internet Addiction Scale (IAS) questions with socio-demographic characteristics and factors affecting internet usage. Data analysis was performed using t-test, single direction variance and correlation analysis.Results: Students covered in the survey, 61.9% were female students and the mean age was 19.97±1.03. 22.1% of students uses internet 20 hours or more per week. Within the scope of the research students' IAS point average was 30.77±15.70.Conclusion: The health professionals are average internet user.

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştirma geleceğin sağlik profesyonellerinde internet bağimliliğinin yaşam kaliteleri üzerine etkisini değerlendirmesi amaciyla planlanmiştir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Tanimlayici tipte olan çalişmanin evrenini Ocak 2015'te özel bir üniversitenin sağlik bölümlerini okuyan öğrencileri (296 kişi) oluşturmuştur. Anketin uygulandiği sirada okulda olan ve çalişmaya katilmayi kabul eden 286 öğrenci örnekleme alinmiştir. Araştirmanin verileri; sosyo-demografik özellikler ve internet kullanimini etkileyen faktörler ile İnternet Bağimlilik Ölçeği (İBÖ) sorularindan oluşan anketin uygulanmasiyla toplanmiştir. Verilerin analizi t testi, tek yönlü varyans ve korelasyon analizleri kullanilarak yapilmiştir.Bulgular: Araştirmaya kapsamina alinan öğrencilerin %61.9'u kiz ve yaş ortalamalari 19.97±1.03'dir. Öğrencilerin %22.1'I haftada 20 saat ve üzeri internet kullanmaktadir. Araştirmaya kapsamina alinan öğrencilerin İBÖ puan ortalamasi 30.77±15.70'dir.Sonuç: Sağlik profesyonelleri ortalama internet kullanicisidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUTAŞDEMİR, N., VERİM, E., BAKIR, E., DENİZ, E. (2017). Effect of Internet Addiction on Life Quality of Future Healthcare Professionals. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 44–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/335714

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Özcan NK, Buzlu S. Problemli İnternet Kullanımını Belirlemede Yardımcı Bir Araç: İnternette Bilissel Durum Ölçeginin Üniversite Ögrencilerinde Geçerlik ve Güvenirligi. Bagımlılık Dergisi 2005;6:19-26
  2. Young K. What Makes the Internet Addictive: Potential Explanations for Pathological Internet Use. Paper Presented at the 105th Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association August 15, 1997, Chicago, IL. http://www.netaddiction. com/article/babitforming.htm (Erisim tarihi:24.05.2015)
  3. Arısoy Ö. Internet Bagımlılıgı. Türkiye Klinikleri Dergisi 2009;21:75-83
  4. Young KS. Internet Addiction. Am Behav Sci 2004;48:402-44
  5. Türkiye Istatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). 2012 Yılı Hanehalkı Bilisim Teknolojileri Kullanımı Arastırması. 16/08/2012 Sayı: 10880 http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=10880 (Erisim tarihi:24.05. 2015)
  6. Kandell JJ. Internet Addiction on Campus: The Vulnerability of College Students. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998;1:11-17
  7. Young KS. Internet Addiction: The Emergence of A New Clinical Disorder. Cyberpsychology and Behaviour 1996;1:237-44
  8. Sahin B. Saglıgın Olcümu ve Kullanım Alanlarına Teorik Bir Bakıs. Saglık ve Toplum 1999;9(8):3-10
  9. Gültekin BK, Dereboy F. Universite Oğrencilerinde Sosyal Fobinin Yaygınlıgı ve Sosyal Fobinin Yaşam Kalitesi, Akademik Basarı ve Kimlik Olusumu Uzerine Etkileri. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2011;22(3):150-8
  10. İlhan N, Batmaz M, Akhan LU. Üniversite Oğrencilerinin Saglıklı Yasam Bicimi Davranısları. Maltepe Universitesi Hemsirelik Bilim ve Sanatı Dergisi 2010;3(3):34-44
  11. Young K. Caught in the Net: How To Recognize The Signs of Internet Addiction and A Winning Strategy For Recovery. John Wiley, New York. http://www.netaddiction.com/articles/babitforming.htm (Erisim tarihi:24.05.2015)
  12. Çakır Balta Ö, Horzum MB. İnternet Bağımlılık Testi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama 2008;7(13):87-102
  13. Johansson A, Gotestam K. Internet Addiction: Characteristics of A Questionnaire and Prevalence in Norwegian Youth (12- 18 years). Scand J Psychol 2004;45:223-9
  14. Morahan-Martin J, Schumacher P. Incidence and Correlates of Pathological. Internet Use among College Students. Comp Human Behav 2000;16:13-29
  15. Chou C, Condron L, Belland JC. A Review of The Research on Internet Addiction. Educational Psychology Review 2005;17(4):363-88
  16. Scherer K. College Life On-Line: Healthy and Unhealthy Internet Use. JCSD 1997;38:655-65
  17. Yen JY, Yen CF, Chen CS, Tang TC, Ko CH. The Association between