Journals / Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni / 2003 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

Krukenberg tumour in which primary tumour was diagnosed lately

Primeri geç saptanan Krukenberg tümörü

Pages
27–30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Summary: in this paper, a case with Krukenberg tumour of ovary whose primaıy tumour located in stomach was diagnosed lately is discussedin the light of current literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Summary: in this paper, a case with Krukenberg tumour of ovary whose primaıy tumour located in stomach was diagnosed lately is discussedin the light of current literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Summary: in this paper, a case with Krukenberg tumour of ovary whose primaıy tumour located in stomach was diagnosed lately is discussedin the light of current literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Summary: in this paper, a case with Krukenberg tumour of ovary whose primaıy tumour located in stomach was diagnosed lately is discussedin the light of current literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Krukenberg tümörü · Erişkin · Kadın

Abstract

Summary: in this paper, a case with Krukenberg tumour of ovary whose primaıy tumour located in stomach was diagnosed lately is discussedin the light of current literature.

Özet

Bu makalede midedeki primeri geç saptanan bir Krukenberg tümörü olgusu literatür ışığında irdelendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANDOĞAN, B., ÖZDEN, S., MENGÜLLÜOĞLU, M., KIR, G., TİLKİ, M., DAYICIOĞLU, V. (2003). Krukenberg tumour in which primary tumour was diagnosed lately. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 27–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/335696

References (1)

  1. Woodruff JD, Novak ER. The Krukenberg tumor study of 48 cases from the Emil Novak Ovarian Tumor Registry. Obstet Gynecol 1960; 15: 351- 360 2. Diddle AW. Krukenberg tumors: Diagnostic problem. Cancer 1955; 8:1026-1034 3. Scully RE, Richardson GS. Luteinization of the stroma of metastatic cancer involving the ovary and its endocrine significance. Cancer 1961; 14;827- 840 4. SaphtiO. Signet-ring cell carcinoma. MilSurg 1951;109:360-369 5. Tso PL, Rringaze WL III, Dauterive AH, Correa P, Cohn I Jr. Gastric carcinoma in the young. Cancer 1987; 59:1362-1365 6. Hale RW. Krukenberg tumor of the ovaries Areview of 81 records. Obstet Gynecol 1968; 32: 221-225 7. Harris M, HowellA, ChrissohouM, SwindeERIC, Hudson M, Sellwood RA. A comparison of the metastatic pattern of infitating lobular carcinoma and infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast. RrJ Cancer 1984;50: 23-30 8. Holtz F, Hart WR. Krukenberg tumors of the ovary. A clinic o pathologic analysis of 27 cases Cancer 1982;50:2438-2447 9. Josh W. Primary Krukenberg tumor of ovary Review of literature and case report. Cancer 1968;22:1199-1207 10. Young RH, Scully RE. Metastatic tumors of the ovary. In Kurman RJ (ed): Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. Fifth Edition, Newyork 2002: 1074-1075 11. UsubutunA, Altinok G, Kucukali T. The value of intraoperative consultation(frozen section) in the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasm. Ada ObstetG.ynecol Scand 1998,77:1013-1016 12. Wang KG, Chan TC, Wang TV, Yang YC, Su TH. Acuracy of frozen section diagnosis in gynecology. Gynecol Oncol 1998, 70;105-110 13. Rose PG, Rubin RR, Nelson RE, Hunter RE, Peak FR, Accuracy of frozen-section (intraoperative consultation) diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 823-826 14. McGill F, Ritter DR, Rickard C, Kaleya RN, Wadler S, Gres ton WM. Management of Krukenberg tumors: an 11-year experience and review of the literature. Prim. Care Update Ob Gyns 1998;5(4):157-158 15. Renaaboud I, GhazliM, KerroumiM, Mansouri A. Krukenberg tumor: 9 cases report.J Gynecol Obstet Eiol Reprod (Paris). 2002;31(4):365-370 16. BlausteinA.Metastatik over tümörleri.Jinekolojik Patoloji Arkadaş Tıp Kitapları İstanbul 1985.805- 806 17. Yakushiji M,Tazaki T,Nishimura H,Kato T Krukenberg tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 112 cases. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1987;39(3)A79-485