Journals / Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of cost-effectivenes and clinical outcomes of abdominal, vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in a selected group

Abdominal, vajinal ve total laparoskopik histerektominin maliyet etkinliklerinin ve klinik sonuçlarının seçili hasta grubunda karşılaştırılması

Pages
24–27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: VH had similar operative and postoperative outcomes but the shortest duration of operation and the lowest surgical cost compared with the other two techniques.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim was to compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy(TLH), total abdominal hysterectomy(TAH), and vaginal hysterectomy(VH) in a selected group of patients.Materials and Methods: Two hundred twenty-three hysterectomies were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were separated into three groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: VH had similar operative and postoperative outcomes but the shortest duration of operation and the lowest surgical cost compared with the other two techniques.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:laparoskopik histerektomi · abdominal histerektomi · vajinal histerektomi

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy(TLH), total abdominal hysterectomy(TAH), and vaginal hysterectomy(VH) in a selected group of patients.Materials and Methods: Two hundred twenty-three hysterectomies were included in this study. The patients were separated into three groups. Group1 included patients with TLH(n=63); TAH patients were placed in Group 2(n=133), and Group 3 was made up of patients who underwent VH(n=37). All three groups had similar ages, parities, and uterine sizes. The main outcome measures were operation time, fever, need for analgesia, duration of hospital survellience, return to work time, perioperative and postoperative complications, the number of blood transfusions, and costs of the surgery.Results: The total operation time was the shortest in the VH group. There was no significant difference in the hospital survellience duration between the three groups. The VH was found to be the cheapest type of hysterectomy. When the VH group was compared with the TLH group, there was no difference in the use of analgesics for postoperative pain or the time return to work. The VH group patients required more blood transfusions in contrast with the TAH(p=0.001) and TLH groups(p<0.001). Conclusion: VH had similar operative and postoperative outcomes but the shortest duration of operation and the lowest surgical cost compared with the other two techniques.

Özet

Amaç: Total laparoskopik histerektomi (TLH), total abdominal histerektomi (TAH) ve vajinal histerektominin (VH) perioperatif ve postoperatif sonuçlarını; seçili hasta grubunda karşılaştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntem: 223 histerektomi çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar üç gruba ayrıldı. Grup 1'de TLH (n = 63); Grup 2'de TAH (n = 133), Grup 3 ise VH (n = 37) yapılan hastalardan oluşuyordu. Her üç grubun da benzer yaş, parite ve uterus boyutları vardı. Başlıca değerlendirilen ölçütler; ameliyat süresi, ateş, analjezi gereksinimi, hastanede kalış süresi, işe geri dönüş süresi, perioperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar, kan transfüzyonu sayısı ve ameliyat masrafları idi.Bulgular: Operasyon süresi VH grubunda en kısa idi. Üç grup arasında hastanede kalış süreleri açısından anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı. VH en ucuz histerektomi tipiydi. VH grubu TLH grubuyla karşılaştırıldığında; analjezik gereksinimi ve işe geri dönüş süresi açısından istatistiki fark tespit edilmedi. VH grubunda; TAH (p = 0.001) ve TLH gruplarına kıyasla daha fazla kan transfüzyonu gerektiği saptandı(p <0.001). Sonuç: VH diğer iki teknik ile karşılaştırıldığında en kısa operasyon süresi ve en düşük cerrahi maliyete sahipken; benzer perioperatif ve postoperatif sonuçlar saptandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇÇI, Ç., ERGEN, E. B., POLAT, M., TELCE, A. B., ABİDE, Ç. Y. (2018). Comparison of cost-effectivenes and clinical outcomes of abdominal, vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in a selected group. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 24–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/335407

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2008
  2. e1-.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.039 2. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy Rates in the United States, 2003. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007
  3. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b 3. Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery 1989
  4. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1989.5.213 4. BRILL AI. Hysterectomy in the 21st Century: Different Approaches, Different Challenges. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006
  5. doi: 10.1097/01.grf.0000211946.51712.42 5. Clayton RD. Hysterectomy. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 2006
  6. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.09.007 6. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. In: Kluivers K, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  7. p. CD003677. 7. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2005
  8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1478 8. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Hawe J, Napp V, Abbott J, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2004
  9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37984.623889.F6 9. Soriano D, Goldstein A, Lecuru F, Daraï E. Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2001
  10. Daraï E, Soriano D, Kimata P, Laplace C, Lecuru F. Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: randomized study. Obstetrics and gynecology 2001
  11. Ribeiro SC, Ribeiro RM, Santos NC, Pinotti JA. A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2003
  12. Summitt RL, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW. Randomized comparis