Journals / Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4

Does type of delivery prevent complications in macrosomic fetuses?

Makrozomik Fetuslarda Doğum Şekli Oluşabilecek Komplikasyonları Önler mi?

Pages
312–316
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Women with suspected fetal macrosomia should be individualized and prophylactic cesarean delivery may be considered for patients who has the risk of delivery complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aims to analyze the effect of delivery method and birth weight over maternal and neonatal complications in 643 women who gave birth to babies weighing 4000 g or above.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material method: 643 patients were divided into groups according to their delivery method (vaginal or caesarean) and birth weight (4000-4500 g or ≥4500 g).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Women with suspected fetal macrosomia should be individualized and prophylactic cesarean delivery may be considered for patients who has the risk of delivery complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Makrozomi · komplikasyon · sezaryen

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the effect of delivery method and birth weight over maternal and neonatal complications in 643 women who gave birth to babies weighing 4000 g or above. Material method: 643 patients were divided into groups according to their delivery method (vaginal or caesarean) and birth weight (4000-4500 g or ≥4500 g). Patients who delivered babies weighing over 4000 g were compared in terms of complication rates according to their delivery method. Subsequently, groups of patients were compared according to delivery weighing 4000 – 4499 g and ≥4500 g, and were analyzed to find out whether there are differences between in terms of complications. Results: Macrosomic infant history, neonatal weight and concomitant DM were observed higher in the group of caesarean delivery patients. No difference was found in neonatal complications. Maternal postpartum hemoglobin levels were significantly lower in caesarian delivery group. No difference was found in terms of complication rates between both delivery method groups in babies born over 4500 g, whereas postpartum hemoglobin level was significantly lower in the group of caesarian delivery of babies weighing 4000 – 4499 g. Conclusion: It is observed that routine caesarian delivery does not provide a significant advantage in reducing complications in macrosomic infants. Women with suspected fetal macrosomia should be individualized and prophylactic cesarean delivery may be considered for patients who has the risk of delivery complications.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, 4000 gr ve üzerinde bebek doğuran 643 gebenin doğum şeklinin ve doğum ağırlıklarının maternal ve neonatal komplikasyonlar üzerine olan etkisinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Materyal metod: 643 hasta doğum şekline (vajinal veya sezaryen) ve doğum ağırlıklarına (4000-4500 ve ≥4500 gram) göre gruplara ayrıldı. 4000 gramın üzerinde doğum yapan hastalar doğum şekline göre komplikasyon oranları açısından karşılaştırıldı. Daha sonra hastalar 4000-4499 gr ve ≥4500 gr doğum yapanlar olarak ayrıldı. Bu iki grubun kendi içinde komplikasyon açısından fark olup olmadığı araştırıldı. Bulgular: Makrozomik infant öyküsü, neonatal ağırlık ve eşlik eden DM, sezaryen ile doğum yapan grupta yüksek saptandı. Neonatal komplikasyonlar açısından herhangi bir fark saptanmadı. maternal postpartum Hb değeri sezaryen olan grupta anlamlı düşük bulundu. 4500 gramın üzerinde doğan bebeklerin doğum şekli ile komplikasyon oranları değişmezken, 4000-4499 gram arasında postpartum Hb değeri sezaryen olan grupta anlamlı düşük saptandı. Sonuç: Rutin sezaryen ile doğumun makrozomik infantlarda komplikasyonları azaltma açısından belirgin bir üstünlük sağlamadığı görülmektedir. Makrozomik infant doğurma riski olan hastalar kişiselleştirilmeli ve doğum komplikasyonu açısından risk taşıyan hastalar sezaryene yönlendirilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSAKAL, S. E., ÖZDEMİRCİ, Ş., BOCUTOĞLU, F., YEŞİL, B., MOLLAMAHMUTOĞLU, L., TAPISIZ, Ö. L. (2018). Does type of delivery prevent complications in macrosomic fetuses?. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4, 312–316. https://ajindex.com/articles/335220

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Dec;64(12):1-64
  2. Williams Obstetrik, 24 th Edition, Chapter 44, Fetal growth disorders. page: 872-890 3. Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Breed EM, Escobar GJ. Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Dec;87(3):220-6
  3. Dan Wang, Li Zhu, Shulian Zhang, Xueqin Wu, Xiaoli Wang, Qin Lv, Dongmei Gan, Ling Liu, Wen Li, Qin Zhou, Jiarong Lu, Haiying He, Jimei Wang, Hua Xin, Zhankui Li, Chao Chen. Predictive macrosomia birthweight thresholds for adversematernal and neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Jan 28:1-24 5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 173: Fetal Macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):e195-e209 6. Peleg D, Warsof S, Wolf MF, Perlitz Y, Shachar IB. Counseling for fetal macrosomia: an estimated fetal weight of 4,000 g is excessively low. Am J Perinatol. 2015 Jan;32(1):71-4 7. Weinert LS. International Association of Diyabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy: comment to the International Association of Diyabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. Diyabetes Care 2010;33:e97
  4. Thornton PS, Stanley CA, De Leon DD, et al.; Pediatric Endocrine Society. Recommendations from the Pediatric Endocrine Society for evaluation andmanagement of persistent hypoglycemia in neonates, infants, and children. J Pediatr 2015; 167:238–245 9. Resnik R. Management of shoulder girdle dystocia. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980;23:559–64
  5. Mohamed Alkahatim Alsammani and Salah Roshdy Ahmed. Fetal and Maternal Outcomes in Pregnancies Complicated with Fetal Macrosomia. N Am J Med Sci. 2012 Jun; 4(6): 283–286
  6. Mbangama-Muela Andy, Mulumba Kapuku Sylvain, Tozin Rahma Rachid, Lumaya Ambis Joëlle, Tandu-Umba Barthélémy, Mbungu Mwimba Roger, Lokomba Bolamba Vicky, Mbanzulu Pita Damien. Trends of Macrosomia at University Clinics of Kinshasa. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018, 8, 263-272 12. Alina Weissmann-Brenner, Michal J. Simchen, Eran Zilberberg, Anat Kalter, Boaz Weisz, Reuven Achiron, Mordechai Dulitzky. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of macrosomic pregnancies. Med Sci Monit, 2012; 18(9): PH77-81 13. Engin Oral, Arzu Cağdaş, Altay Geze,r Semih Kaleli, Kiliç Aydinli, Fahri Öçer. Perinatal and maternal outcomes