Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2017 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Relationship Between Tumor Density in Radical Prostatectomy Material, Preoperative Predictive Factors and Biochemical Recurrence

Radikal Prostatektomi Materyalindeki Tümör Dansitesinin Preoperatif Prediktif Faktörler ve Biyokimyasal Rekürrens ile İlişkisi

Pages
46–50
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In BR positive patients of multivariate analysis, the prostate needle biopsy (PNB) Gleason score of preoperative predictive factors, number of focus and perineural invasion presence and only surgical margin positivity were detected to be significantly higher from the postoperative prognostic factors (p 4.34 cc/cc compared to patients with tumor density ≤4.34 cc/cc (p 4.34 cc/cc).Conclusion: In conclusion, it was found that the most important prognostic factors affecting BR were surgical margin positivity and high tumor density; PSA density, PNB tumor percentage and number of focus were alone associated with high tumor density among the preoperative predictive factors and all predictive factors were positively correlated with tumor density

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we assessed the relationship between tumor density (tumor volume prostate volume ratio), preoperative predictive factors and biochemical recurrence (BR) in patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for prostate cancer in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: For the patients undergoing RRP between 20052015 preoperative predictive factors, postoperative prognostic factors and BR status were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In BR positive patients of multivariate analysis, the prostate needle biopsy (PNB) Gleason score of preoperative predictive factors, number of focus and perineural invasion presence and only surgical margin positivity were detected to be significantly higher from the postoperative prognostic factors (p 4.34 cc/cc compared to patients with tumor density ≤4.34 cc/cc (p 4.34 cc/cc).Conclusion: In conclusion, it was found that the most important prognostic factors affecting BR were surgical margin positivity and high tumor density; PSA density, PNB tumor percentage and number of focus were alone associated with high tumor density among the preoperative predictive factors and all predictive factors were positively correlated with tumor density
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we assessed the relationship between tumor density (tumor volume prostate volume ratio), preoperative predictive factors and biochemical recurrence (BR) in patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for prostate cancer in our clinic. Materials and Methods: For the patients undergoing RRP between 20052015 preoperative predictive factors, postoperative prognostic factors and BR status were evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative factors were compared between the patient groups whose BR was detected as positive and negative. Subsequently, the cut-off value effecting BR of tumor density was determined and the preoperative predictive values, postoperative prognostic factors and BR rates were investigated in patients whose tumor density found low and high. Results: BR was detected in 63 of 338 patients who underwent RRP, but not in 275 patients. In BR positive patients of multivariate analysis, the prostate needle biopsy (PNB) Gleason score of preoperative predictive factors, number of focus and perineural invasion presence and only surgical margin positivity were detected to be significantly higher from the postoperative prognostic factors (p 4.34 cc/cc compared to patients with tumor density ≤4.34 cc/cc (p 4.34 cc/cc).Conclusion: In conclusion, it was found that the most important prognostic factors affecting BR were surgical margin positivity and high tumor density; PSA density, PNB tumor percentage and number of focus were alone associated with high tumor density among the preoperative predictive factors and all predictive factors were positively correlated with tumor density

Özet

Amaç: Bu yazıda kliniğimizde prostat adenokarsinomu nedenli radikal retropubik prostatektomi (RRP) yapılan hastaların prostatektomi materyalindeki tümör dansitesinin (tümör hacminin prostat volümüne oranı) preoperatif prediktif faktörler ve biyokimyasal rekürrens (BR) ile ilişkisi araştırıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2005-2015 tarihleri arasında RRP yapılan hastaların preoperatif prediktif faktörleri, postoperatif prognostik faktörleri ve BR durumları değerlendirildi. BR pozitif ve negatif saptanan hasta gruplarında preoperatif ve postoperatif faktörler karşılaştırıldı. Sonrasında tümör dansitesinin BR üzerine etkili cut-off değeri saptanarak tümör dansitesi düşük ve yüksek saptanan hastalar arasındaki preoperatif prediktif veriler, postoperatif prognostik faktörler ve BR oranları araştırıldı.Bulgular: RRP yapılan 338 hastanın 63'ünde BR saptanmışken, 275'inde saptanmadı. Yapılan multivariate analizde BR saptanan hastalarda preoperatif prediktif faktörlerden prostat iğne biyopsisi (PİB) Gleason skoru, odak sayısı ve perinöral invazyon varlığı ile postoperatif prognostik faktörlerden sadece cerrahi sınır pozitifliğinin tek başına anlamlı oranda yüksek olduğu gözlendi ( 4,34 cc/cc saptanan hastalarda, 4,34 cc/cc) ile ilişkili olduğu gözlendi. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, BR'ye etki eden en önemli prognostik faktörlerin cerrahi sınır pozitifliği ve yüksek tümör dansitesi olduğu, preoperatif prediktif verilerden PSA dansitesi, PİB tümör yüzdesi ve odak sayısının tek başına yüksek tümör dansitesi ile ilişkili olduğu ve tüm prediktif faktörlerin tümör dansitesi ile pozitif korele olduğu saptanmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, S., BOZKURT, O., ASLAN, G., DEMİR, Ö., TUNA, E. B., YÖRÜKOĞLU, K., MUNGAN, M. U. (2017). Relationship Between Tumor Density in Radical Prostatectomy Material, Preoperative Predictive Factors and Biochemical Recurrence. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 46–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/334880

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Stapleton AM, et al. A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:766-771
  2. Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1499-1507
  3. Yossepowitch O, Bjartell A, Eastham JA, et al. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences. Eur Urol 2009;55:87-99
  4. Evans SM, Millar JL, Frydenberg M, et al. Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer Registry. BJU Int 2014;114:680-690
  5. Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010;8:162-200
  6. Bozkurt O, Çelik S, Demir Ö, et al. Clinical Significance of Perineural Invasion in Prostate Needle Biopsy in Patients Diagnosed with Extraprostatic Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion after Radical Prostatectomy. Bulletin of Urooncology 2015;14:5-7
  7. Çelik S, Bozkurt O, Yıldız HA, et al. Association between Hormonal Evaluation Before Prostate Needle Biopsy and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer. Bulletin of Urooncology 2016;15:52-56
  8. Çelik S, Bozkurt O, Yıldız HA, et al. Significance of Pretreatment Testosterone Levels in Prostate Cancer Risk Groups. Bulletin of Urooncology 2016;15:98-102
  9. Stamey TA, Yemoto CM, McNeal JE, et al. Prostate cancer is highly predictable: a prognostic equation based on all morphological variables in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2000;163:1155-1160
  10. Fine SW, Amin MB, Berney DM, et al. A contemporary update on pathology reporting for prostate cancer: biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol 2012;62:20-39
  11. Cho SY, Choi YD. The Effect of Tumor-Prostate Ratio on Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy. World J Mens Health 2016;34:123-128
  12. Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Yemoto CM, et al. Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer. JAMA 1999;281:1395-1400
  13. Gundersen HJ, Bagger P, Bendtsen TF, et al. The new stereological tools: disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 1988;96:857-881
  14. Jalloh M, Myers F, Cowan JE, et al. Racial variation in prostate cancer upgrading and upstaging among men with low-risk clinic