Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Laparascopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Experience for Rectal Prolapse At Our Center

Rektal Prolapsusta Laparoskopik Ventral Mesh Rektopeksi Deneyimlerimiz

Pages
309–314
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a treatment modality it not only provides good symptomatic relief but also has acceptable recurrence rates and minimal morbidity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Rectal prolapse, a clinical condition that causes serious social and medical problems, usually presents with constipation and incontinence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The Files of patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolase between January 2015 – April 2018 at our center were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a treatment modality it not only provides good symptomatic relief but also has acceptable recurrence rates and minimal morbidity.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Rectal prolapse, a clinical condition that causes serious social and medical problems, usually presents with constipation and incontinence. In our study we intend to present outcomes of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy treatment performed at our center. Materials and Methods: The Files of patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolase between January 2015 – April 2018 at our center were retrospectively reviewed. The demographic and clinical features of a total of 26 patients were recorded. The patients who had open surgery and other surgical techniques were excluded from the study. Results: Nineteen (73.1%) of the patients were female while 7 (26.9%) were male with average age of 42 (20- 67). Physical examination revealed synchronous rectocele in 5 (19%) patients. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy was performed on all the patients. Average time for the surgical procedure was 90 (50-30) minutes. Average hospital stay was 3.1 (2-4) days. Three patients had surgical site infection that was successfully managed medically. One week postoperative follow-up examination was unremarkable. One month postoperative follow-up review revealed that 23 (88.5%) patients had total relieve of compliants, while 2 (7.7%) reported partial relieve of the complaints. One (3.8%) patient reported persitence of the preoperative complaints. Average follow-up preiod was 18 (3-36) months. There was no recurrence in any of the patients. Conclusion: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is a safe and effective surgical approach for rectal prolapse. As a treatment modality it not only provides good symptomatic relief but also has acceptable recurrence rates and minimal morbidity.

Özet

Amaç: Rektal prolapsus genellikle kabızlık ve inkontinans ile seyreden, ciddi sosyal ve medikal sorunlara neden olan klinik bir durumdur. Çalışmamızda laparoskopik ventral mesh rektopeksi uyguladığımız hastalarımızın tedavi sonuçlarını sunmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2015 ve Nisan 2018 yılları arasında rektal prolapsus tanısı konulan ve laparoskopik ventral mesh rektopeksi uygulanan hastaların dosyaları geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Toplam 26 hastanın demografik ve klinik özellikleri kaydedildi. Açık cerrahi uygulanan ve diğer cerrahi teknikler ile tedavi edilen hastalar çalışma dışı bırakıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların 19' u (% 73.1) kadın, 7' si (%26.9) erkek ve ortalama yaşları 42 (20-67) idi. Fizik incelemede 5 (%19) hastada eş zamanlı rektosel mevcuttu. Tüm hastalara laparoskopik ventral mesh rektopeksi uygulandı. Ortalama ameliyat süresi 90 (50-130) dk idi. Ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 3.1 (2-4) gün idi. Üç ( %11.5) hastada yara yeri enfeksiyonu gelişti ve medikal tedavi ile düzeldi. Hastaların 1. hafta kontrollerinde sorun izlenmedi. Ameliyat sonrası 1. ay kontrolünde hastaların 23' ünde (%88.5) şikayetlerin tam, 2' inde (%7.7) kısmi olarak düzeldiği görüldü. Bir (%3.8) hastada şikayetler düzelmedi. Ortalama takip süresi 18 (3-36) ay idi. Hiçbir hastada nüks izlenmedi. Sonuç: Laparoskopik ventral mesh rektopeksi rektal prolapsuslarda güvenli bir şekilde uygulanabilen etkin tedavi yaklaşımıdır. Kabul edilebilir rekürrens oranı ve minimal morbiditeye sahip iyi semptomatik rahatlama sağlayan tedavi seçeneklerinden biridir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YABANOĞLU, H., EZER, A., ARER, İ. M., HARGURA, A. S., AVCI, T., KUŞ, M. (2019). Laparascopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Experience for Rectal Prolapse At Our Center. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 309–314. https://ajindex.com/articles/334679

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Riansuwan W, Hull TL, Bast J, Hammel JP, Church JM. Comparison of perineal operations with abdominal operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse. World J Surg 2010; 34(5): 1116- 1122
  2. Çalıskan C, Korkut AM, Fırat Ö, Akgün E, Osmanoğlu H. Rectal prolapse experience: 68 cases in 27 years. Ege Journal of Medicine 2008; 47(1): 29-34
  3. Rogers AC, McCawley N, Hanly AM, Deasy J, McNamara DA, Burke JP. Trends in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a population analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33(4): 459-465
  4. Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolaps, A comparision of techniques. Br J Surg 1992; 79(2): 107-113
  5. Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg 2005; 94(3): 207-210
  6. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008; 300(11): 1311-1316
  7. Bordeianou L, Hicks CW, Kaiser AM, Alavi K, Sudan R, Wise PE.Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-pecific managementstrategies. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18(5): 1059-1069
  8. Akcan A, Sözüer E, Akyıldız H, Küçük C, Çetin, Ok E, et al. Tam kat rektalprolapsus cerrahi tedavisinde rektopeksi ve rektopeksi ile birlikte sigmoid rezeksiyonun karşılaştırılması. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 2007; 23(2): 54-57
  9. Hernández P, Targarona EM, Balagué C, Martínez C, Pallares JL, Garriga J, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse. Cir Esp 2008; 84(6):318-322
  10. Kellokumpu IH, Vironen J, Scheinin T. Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: a prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel function. Surg Endosc 2000; 14(7): 634-640
  11. Sabancı Ü, Öğün İ, Candemir G. Laparoskopik Rektopeksi Deneyimlerimiz. Kolon Rektum Hast. Derg 2007; 17: 130-134
  12. Raftopoulos Y, Senagore AJ, Di Giuro G, Bergamaschi R; Rectal Prolapse Recurrence Study Group.Recurrence rates after abdominal surgery for complete rectal prolapse: a multicenter pooled analysis of 643 individual patient data. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(6): 1200-1206
  13. D'Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2004; 91(11): 1500- 1505
  14. Ris F, Gorissen KJ, Ragg J, Gosselink MP, Buchs NC, Hompes R, et al. Rectal axis and enterocele on proctogram may predict laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy outcomes for rectal intussu