SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Post-Operational Complications of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Learning Curve

Öğrenme Eğrisinde Robotik Radikal Prostatektomi Sonrası Komplikasyonların Değerlendirilmesi

Cem İPEK
Muhammet Serdar BUĞDAY
EYÜP VELİ KÜÇÜK
Pages
230–234
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Material and Methods: Between July 2009 and January 2012, a total of 200 RARP patients at learning curve with a minimum of 1 year follow-up were evaluated with Clavien-Dindo classification regarding peri-operative and post-operative

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To evaluate the complications of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at learning curve with standardised criteria and report the outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To evaluate the complications of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at learning curve with standardised criteria and report the outcomes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Material and Methods: Between July 2009 and January 2012, a total of 200 RARP patients at learning curve with a minimum of 1 year follow-up were evaluated with Clavien-Dindo classification regarding peri-operative and post-operative
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

To evaluate the complications of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at learning curve with standardised criteria and report the outcomes. Material and Methods: Between July 2009 and January 2012, a total of 200 RARP patients at learning curve with a minimum of 1 year follow-up were evaluated with Clavien-Dindo classification regarding peri-operative and post-operative

Özet

Öğrenme eğrisinde robot yardımlı radikal prostatektomi (RARP) sonrası komplikasyonlar standardize edilmiş kriterlere göre değerlendirilerek sonuçları paylaşılmıştır. Materyal-Metot: Temmuz 2008-Ocak 2012 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde tek cerrah tarafından uygulanan öğrenme eğrisindeki ilk 200 RARP hastası, perioperatif ve postoperatif (PO) komplikasyonların standardize edilmiş Clavien-Dindo Klasifikasyon sistemine uyarlanarak değerlendirildi. Hastalar operasyonu takip eden dönemde 1. ay ve daha sonra 3 aylık periyotlarla takip edildi. Datalar telefonla ulaşılarak toplandı. Hastalar ilk 100 ve ikinci 100 hasta olacak şekilde 2 gruba ayrılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Toplamda hastalar ortalama 21 ay takip edildi. Birinci ayda 38 hastada 49 komplikasyon izlendi. 49 komplikasyondan 42'si minör ve 6'sı major ve bir exitus (%0.5 Clavien 5) olarak saptandı. Öğrenme eğrisi gruplarında, ilk grup için 26 hastada 33 (%16.5), ikinci grup için 12 hastada 16 (%8) erken komplikasyon görüldü. 30-90 gün arasında toplam 8 komplikasyon izlenirken, bunların 6'sı grup1, 2'si grup 2'deydi. 90 gün sonrası toplam 14 komplikasyon görüldü. Sonuç: RARP, kabul edilebilir komplikasyon oranları ile prostat kanseri tedavisinde uygun bir tedavi protokolüdür. Öğrenme eğrisindeki hasta sayısının artması ile komplikasyon oranları azalmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

İPEK, C., BUĞDAY, M. S., KÜÇÜK, E. V. (2015). Evaluation of Post-Operational Complications of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Learning Curve. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 230–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/334561

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, Joniau S, Matveev VB, Schmid HP, et al. European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008; 53(1):68-80.
  2. Murphy DG, Bjartell A, Ficarra V, Graefen M, Haese A, Montironi R, et al. Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications. Eur Urol 2010; 57(5):735-746.
  3. Agarwal PK, Sammon J, Bhandari A, Dabaja A, Diaz M, Dusik-Fenton S, et al. Safety profile of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. Eur Urol 2011; 59(5):684-698.
  4. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 1992; 111(5):518-526.
  5. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2):205-213.
  6. Lebeau T, Roupret M, Ferhi K, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F, Bitker MO, et al. Assessing the complications of laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery: the case of radical prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 01-FEB-2011; 25(2): 536-542
  7. Lasser MS, Renzulli J 2nd, Turini GA 3rd, Haleblian G, Sax HC, Pareek G. An unbiased prospective report of perioperative complications of robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2010; 75(5):1083-1089. Martin RC 2nd, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002; 235(6):803-813. Donat SM. Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. Urology 2007; 69(2):221-225.
  8. Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Moniz RR, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, et al. Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol 2010; 57(6):945-952.
  9. Fischer B, Engel N, Fehr JL, John H. Complications of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2008; 26(6):595- 602. Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010; 57(3):363-370.
  10. Murphy DG, Bjartell A, Ficarra V, Graefen M, Haese A, Montironi R, Montorsi F, Moul JW, Novara G, Sauter G, Sulser T, van der Poel H. Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications. Eur Urol 2010;