Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Cost Analysis of The Diagnostic Strategies Used For Diabetes Mellitus With Decision Tree

Pages
440–445
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Costs could be lowered byensuring physicians are aware of and implementing more cost-effective diagnostic strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction:As the prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) continue to rise, the costs of the diagnostic strategies used to detect it have gained importance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to analyze the cost of DM diagnostic strategies in a hospital setting.Materials and Methods:This cross-sectional study included people over 18 years old with no previous DM diagnosis that presented to the internal medicine outpatient clinic for any reason and underwent serum glucose testing between December 1, 2012 and February 28, 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Costs could be lowered byensuring physicians are aware of and implementing more cost-effective diagnostic strategies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction:As the prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) continue to rise, the costs of the diagnostic strategies used to detect it have gained importance. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost of DM diagnostic strategies in a hospital setting.Materials and Methods:This cross-sectional study included people over 18 years old with no previous DM diagnosis that presented to the internal medicine outpatient clinic for any reason and underwent serum glucose testing between December 1, 2012 and February 28, 2013. Decision treeanalysis was used to calculate weighted costs of the various diagnostic methods. Results:The study included 520 people. The prevalence of DM and pre-DM was 16.3% and 15.0%, respectively. During the study period, the total cost of all tests used was 2164.40 USD, the average cost per person was 4.14 USD, and the average cost per diagnosis was 25.46 USD. The most cost-effective strategy for the diagnosis of DM was fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c tests requested together, while strategies using FPG testing were most cost-effective for the diagnosis of non-DM. Conclusion:The diagnostic strategies recommended in national and international guidelines are considerably less costly than many of the strategies used in our hospital. Costs could be lowered byensuring physicians are aware of and implementing more cost-effective diagnostic strategies.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAHİN, E. F., İLHAN, M. N., ÖCAL, J. Y., KARAŞAHİN, Ö. (2020). Cost Analysis of The Diagnostic Strategies Used For Diabetes Mellitus With Decision Tree. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 440–445. https://ajindex.com/articles/334493

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Saltık A. New Concepts in Health Economics. Community and Physician. (Sağlık Ekonomisinde Yeni Kavramlar. Toplum ve Hekim.) 1995; 10(68): 38
  2. IDF Diabetes Atlas 8th Edition (2017), http://diabetesatlas.org/IDF_Diabetes_Atlas_8e_interactive_EN/ (Access date: 12/11/2018
  3. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. General Directorate of Primary Health Care, Diabetes Prevention and Control Program Action Plan of Turkey (2011 – 2014), (T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Temel Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Türkiye Diyabet Önleme Ve Kontrol Programı Eylem Planı (2011-2014)), Ankara, 816, 2011. (ISBN: 978-975-590-346-0)
  4. Republic of Turkey Social Security Institution Notification of Health Practices -2013 Appendix-2A Official Gazette: 24.03.2013-28597
  5. American Diabetes Association, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care, 35(1), 2012
  6. Turkey Association of Endocrinology and Metabolism (TEMD), Diagnosis, Treatment and Monitoring Guide of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications -2011, (Türkiye Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Derneği, TEMD Diabetes Mellitus ve Komplikasyonlarının Tanı, Tedavi ve İzlem Kılavuzu-2011), Ankara, September 2011. (ISBN: 978-605-4011-10-0
  7. National Diabetes Congress Consensus Group (2013) Diabetes Diagnosis and Treatment Guide, Turkey Diabetes Foundation, (Ulusal Diyabet Kongresi Konsensus Grubu (2013) Diyabet Tanı ve Tedavi Rehberi) Turkey Diabetes Foundation, 3rd edition. ISBN 978-975-98038-2-7 8. Lezki Ş, Er F. Application of decision tree and effect diagram for the decision of holiday place. Anatolia: Journal of Tourism Research (Tatil yeri kararının verilmesinde karar ağacı ve etki diyagramının uygulanması. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi) 2010; 21(2): 233-242
  8. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey,(Online), rates at 15:30 on June 28, 2013 Rates. Bulletin No: 2013/126 (Available from: http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/kurlar/201306/28062013.html Access date: 30/06/2013
  9. Toscano CM, Duncan BB, Mengue SS, Polanczyk CA, Nucci LB, e Forti AC, et al for the CNDDM Working Group. Initial impact and cost of a nationwide population screening campaign for diabetes in Brazil: A follow up study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8: 189
  10. Khunti K, Gillies C, Taub NA, Mostafa SA, Hiles SL, Abrams KL, et al. A comparison of cost per case detected of screening strategies for Type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose regulation: Modelling study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012; 97(3): 505-513
  11. O’Connor PJ, Rush WA, Cher