Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Tamsulosin Can Improve Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients Under Active Surveillance Due to Low Risk Prostate Cancer: Prospective Controlled Study

Pages
107–112
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The improvement in IPSS and Qmax, and the need for surgical treatment were similar to the control group

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients under active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer (Pca).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2010 and 2014 were evaluated prospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The improvement in IPSS and Qmax, and the need for surgical treatment were similar to the control group
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients under active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer (Pca). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2010 and 2014 were evaluated prospectively. Inclusion criteria for AS were PSA level below 10 ng/mL, a tumor in a maximum of two cores, a tumor core percentage below 50%, a clinical stage ≤ T2a and a Gleason score ≤6. Patients under AS with LUTS were included in the study group and patients with benign pathology results with LUTS were included in the control group. International prostate symptom score (IPSS) and uroflowmetry test were used to evaluate LUTS. The maximum flow rate (Qmax) was recorded. All patients received tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily in a modified-release formulation (Flomax MR®, Astellas, Japan). Transurethral resection prostatectomy (TUR-P) was performed when surgical treatment was necessary for obstruction despite tamsulosin treatment. Results: The study included a total of 91 patients, 41 patients in the AS group and 50 patients in the control group. Patients were assessed after six months. There was a 30% reduction in IPSS in the AS group and 24.5% in the control group (p=0.591). Qmax increased by 20.4% in the AS group and by 20% in the control group (p=0.985). The need for TUR-P was similar between the two groups (14.6% vs 20%, p=0.503) during three-year follow-up. Conclusion: Tamsulosin can be used safely and with high efficacy for LUTS in patients under AS for low-risk Pca. The improvement in IPSS and Qmax, and the need for surgical treatment were similar to the control group

🔖

Cite This Article

DALKILIÇ, A., HORASANLI, K., BAYAR, G., KILINÇ, M. F., YAVUZ, A., TANRIVERDİ, O. (2019). Tamsulosin Can Improve Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients Under Active Surveillance Due to Low Risk Prostate Cancer: Prospective Controlled Study. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 107–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/334391

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:7-30
  2. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:271-289
  3. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Briers E, et al. EAU-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer 2017. Available at: http://uroweb.org/ guideline/prostate-cancer
  4. Klotz L. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: for whom? J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8165-8169
  5. Gravas S, Bach T, Drake M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Management of Non-Neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS),incl. Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO) 2017. Available at: http:// uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts
  6. Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Thompson CL, et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: results from the Epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study. BJU Int 2009;104:352-360. 7. van Andel G, Bottomley A, Fosså SD, et al. An international field study of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: a questionnaire for assessing the healthrelated quality of life of patients with prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:2418-2424
  7. Michel MC, Mehlburger L, Bressel HU, Goepel M. Comparison of tamsulosin efficacy in subgroups of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 1998;1:332-335
  8. Govorov AV, Vasilyev AO, Pushkar DY. Efficacy of tamsulosin for treating lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Urologiia 2017;4:37-41
  9. Klotz LH, Choo R, Morton G, Danjoux C. Expectant management with selective delayed intervention for favorable-risk prostate cancer. Can J Urol 2002;9(Suppl 1):2-7
  10. Klotz, Vesprini D, Sethukavalan P, et al. Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:272-277
  11. Adamy A, Yee DS, Matsushita K, et al. Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 2011;185:477-482
  12. Khatami A, Aus G, Damber JE, et al. PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section. Int J Cancer 2007;120:170-174
  13. Timilshina N, Ouellet V, Alibhai SM, et al. Analysis of active surveillance uptake for low-risk localized prostate cancer in Canada: a Canadian multi-i