Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Clinical and Histopathological Features of Genitourinary Sarcomas: Our Experiences and Case Series at a Single Center

Pages
93–98
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At a median follow-up of 23.5 (range = 4-62) months, the recurrence-free and progression-free survival rate was 50%, while the overall survival rate was 50%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The incidence of genitourinary sarcomas is very low, so the published reports in the literature are very limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data and postoperative follow-up findings of eight cases aged 3-72 years who were diagnosed as genitourinary sarcoma and treated between January 2013 and February 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At a median follow-up of 23.5 (range = 4-62) months, the recurrence-free and progression-free survival rate was 50%, while the overall survival rate was 50%.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The incidence of genitourinary sarcomas is very low, so the published reports in the literature are very limited. We aimed to present our experiences of eight cases originating from various genitourinary organs treated in our clinic. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data and postoperative follow-up findings of eight cases aged 3-72 years who were diagnosed as genitourinary sarcoma and treated between January 2013 and February 2017. Results: All eight cases were male and the mean age at diagnosis was 47.87 (range = 3-72) years. The most common site was paratesticular area (five cases, 62.5%) followed by kidney (two cases, 25%) and prostate (one case, 12.5%). Histological types of tumors were rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) (two cases, 25%), liposarcoma (LPS) (two cases, 25%), leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (two cases, 25%), synovial sarcoma (one case, 12.5%) and malignant fibrous histiostoma (MFH) (one case, 12.5%). At a median follow-up of 23.5 (range = 4-62) months, the recurrence-free and progression-free survival rate was 50%, while the overall survival rate was 50%. Among the five paratesticular sarcomas, the worst prognosis was seen in LMS (local recurrence at the 4th, overall survival was 28 months) and MFH (local recurrence at the 8th, overall survival was 33 months). Among all sarcoma cases, LMS and synovial sarcoma were the histologic types with the worst prognosis. The histological types with the best prognosis were LPS and RMS with no recurrence or progression during follow-up. In all cases with a median tumor size of 52.5 mm (range = 11-210), LPS was found to have a better prognosis, although the largest tumor size was in renal LPS. According to FNCLCC classifications, local recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in grade II sarcomas than in grade III (p=0.042). Conclusion: Histopathological features and oncologic outcomes of genitourinary sarcomas differ. The prognosis of paratesticular sarcomas is better than other genitourinary organ sarcomas. LPS has higher cure rates after treatment in histological subtypes. The prognosis of histopathologically poorly differentiated subtypes and high-grade tumors is poor. If adjuvant treatments are not added, they may be fatal with local recurrence or distant metastasis in a short time.

🔖

Cite This Article

SELVİ, İ., GÜVEN, E. O. (2019). Clinical and Histopathological Features of Genitourinary Sarcomas: Our Experiences and Case Series at a Single Center. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 93–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/334390

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Russo P, Brady MS, Colon K, et al. Adult Urological Sarcoma. J Urol 1992;147:1032-1037
  2. Mondainia N, Pallib D, Saieva C, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Overall Survival in Genitourinary SarcomasTreated with Curative Intent: A Multicenter Study. Eur Urol 2005;47:468-473
  3. Dotan ZA, Tal R, Golijanin D, et al. Adult Genitourinary Sarcoma: The 25-Year Memorial Sloan-Kettering Experience. J Urol 2006;176:2033 2039
  4. Wang X, Tu X, Tan P, et al. Adult genitourinary sarcoma: Clinical characteristics and survival in a series of patients treated at a highvolume institution. Int J Urol 2017;24:425-431
  5. Coindre JM, Terrier P, Bui NB, et al. Prognostic factors in adult patients with locally controlled soft tissue sarcoma. A study of 546 patients from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:869-877
  6. Coindre JM, Trojani M, Contesso G, et al. Reproducibility of a histopatological grading system for adult soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 1986;58:306-309
  7. Lee G, Lee SY, Seo S, et al. Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of urological soft tissue sarcomas. Korean J Urol 2011;52:669-673
  8. Vuruskan BA, Ozsen M, Coskun B, Yalcinkaya U. Evaluation of incidence and histolopathological findings of soft tissue sarcomas in genitourinary tract: Uludag university experience. Int Braz J Urol 2018;45:68-73
  9. Coleman J, Brennan M F, Alektiar K, Russo P. Adult spermatic cord sarcomas: management and results. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:669-675
  10. Jaques DP, Coit DG, Hajdu SI, Brennan MF. Management of primary and recurrent soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum. Am Surg 1990;212:51-59
  11. Bautista N, Su W, O’Connell TX. Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas: prognosis and treatment of primary and recurrent disease. Am Surg 2000;66:832-836
  12. Nijhuis PH, Sars PR, Plaat BE, et al. Clinico-pathological data and prognostic factors in completely resected AJCC stage I-III liposarcomas. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:535-543
  13. Cho SY, Moon KC, Cheong MS, et al. Localized Resectable Genitourinary Sarcoma in Adult Korean Patients: Experiences at a Single Center. Yonsei Med J 2011;52:761-767
  14. Cheville JC, Dundore PA, Nascimento AG, et al. Leiomyosarcoma of the prostate. Report of 23 cases. Cancer 1995;76:1422-1427
  15. Ferrari A, Bisogno G, Casanova M, et al. Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: report from the Italian and German Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:449-455
  16. Khoubehi B, Mishra V, Ali M, et al. Adult paratesticular t