Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Current Status of Urine and Serum Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Follow-up of Bladder Cancer: Review

Pages
127–134
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, integrating the use of molecular biomarkers with conventional pathological evaluation will allow us to make clinical decisions, such as the selection of adjuvant and salvage treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bladder cancer is a very common, aggressive malignant tumor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is associated with high recurrence and mortality rates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, integrating the use of molecular biomarkers with conventional pathological evaluation will allow us to make clinical decisions, such as the selection of adjuvant and salvage treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Bladder cancer is a very common, aggressive malignant tumor. It is associated with high recurrence and mortality rates. Early detection of bladder cancer and recurrences is very vital to ensure long survival. The main purpose of screening methods is to detect the disease at an early stage. Diagnosis and follow-up of these patients are currently based on endoscopic approaches, which is expensive and invasive, and urinary cytology with low sensitivity. In order to reduce the burden of cystoscopic evaluation, which is the standard approach used in the follow-up, urine strip tests have been used in order to evaluate the presence of hematuria, and cost effective and relatively high-performance molecular markers, respectively. However, there is still no safe biomarker to replace the conventional approach. Bladder tumors exhibit a wide heterogeneity with various molecular differences associated with different morphological symptoms and disease phenotypes. Therefore, the introduction of biomarkers that evaluate the aggressiveness of the disease, the risk of progression, the likelihood of recurrence and prognosis will improve patient management. In addition, integrating the use of molecular biomarkers with conventional pathological evaluation will allow us to make clinical decisions, such as the selection of adjuvant and salvage treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZHAN, M., GEMALMAZ, H. (2019). Evaluation of Current Status of Urine and Serum Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Follow-up of Bladder Cancer: Review. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 127–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/334384

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Dinçel Ç. (edit) Üroonkoloji kitabı. Genişletilmiş ikinci baskı. Mete Basımevi. İzmir 2013;251-523
  2. Ferlay J, Bray F, Forman D, et al. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No.10 2010, International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France. Globocan 2008 v1.2 3. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, et al Campbell Urology
  3. Baskı. 4.Cilt. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 2005. s.2732-65
  4. Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger E, et al. Guidelines on non-muscle invasive baldder cancer 2014
  5. Parker J, Spiess P. Current and Emerging Bladder Cancer Urinary Biomarkers. ScientificWorldJournal 2011;11:1103-1112
  6. Pruthi RS. The value of urine cytology in the diagnosis and management of urinary tract malignancies. Pathology Case Reviews 2000;5:102-105
  7. Turbat-Herrera EA, Colom H. The dilemma of urinary cytology revisited. Pathology Case Reviews 2000;5:95-101
  8. Planz B, Jochims E, Deix T, et al. The role of urinary cytology for detection of bladder cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:304-308
  9. Badalament RA, Fair WR, Whitmore WF, et al. The relative value of cytometry and cytology in the management of bladder cancer. Semin Urol 1988;6:22-30
  10. Tribukait B, EI-Bedeiwy A, Shaaban AA. Prediction of lymph node metastases in bladder carcinoma with deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometry. J Urol 1990;144:884-887
  11. Golijanin D, Shapiro A, Pode D. Immunostaining of cytokeratin 20 in cells from voided urine for detection of bladder cancer. J Urol 2000;164:1922-1925
  12. Rotem D, Cassel A, Lindenfeld N, et al. Urinary cytokeratin 20 as a marker for transitional cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2000;37:601-604
  13. Fernandez-Gomez J, Rodriguez-Martinez JJ, Barmadah SE, et al. Urinary CYFRA 21.1 is not a useful marker for the detection of recurrences in the follow-up of superficial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2007;51:1267-1274
  14. Bavaccini S, Casadio V, Amadori D. The current role of telomerase in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. Indian J Urol 2005;25:40-46
  15. Ito H, Kyo S, Kanaya T. Expression of human telomerase subunits and correlation with telomerase activity in urothelial cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1998;4:1603-1608
  16. Mitra AP, Cote RJ. Molecular screening for bladder cancer: progress and potential. Nature Reviews Urology 2010;11-20
  17. Tilki D, Burger M, Dalbagni N, et al. Urine markers for detection and surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2011;60:484-492
  18. Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, et al. Guidelines on Non-muscle invasive bladde