Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2016 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Rebiopsy Results of the Patients in Which the First Biopsy Revealed High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia

İlk Prostat Biyopsisi Sonucu Yüksek Dereceli Prostatik İntraepitelyal Neoplazi Gelen Hastaların Tekrar Biyopsi Sonuçları

Pages
57–60
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that 48% of these patients had benign (prostate tissues and prostatitis), 21% had HGPIN, 11% of them had malignancy suspected focus and 20% patients had PCA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The incidence of the prostate adenocarsinome (PCA) in the repeat prostate biopsy after the high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) diagnosis has decreased with the increase of the quadrant numbers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Contrary to the former literature, PCA incidence after the HGPIN diagnosis was not increased as compared to cases without HGPIN.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that 48% of these patients had benign (prostate tissues and prostatitis), 21% had HGPIN, 11% of them had malignancy suspected focus and 20% patients had PCA.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The incidence of the prostate adenocarsinome (PCA) in the repeat prostate biopsy after the high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) diagnosis has decreased with the increase of the quadrant numbers. Contrary to the former literature, PCA incidence after the HGPIN diagnosis was not increased as compared to cases without HGPIN. In this study the re-biopsy results of the patients whose first prostate biopsy results were HGPIN were evaluated.Materials and Methods: A total of 2.758 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in our institude between January 2005 to June 2013 due to increased prostate spesific antigen (PSA) levels or abnormal digital rectal examination results were examined and 353 of these patients with the diagnosis of HGPIN were included in the study. Under local anesthesia, 10 cores taken in the first and 12 cores taken in the second biopsies.Results: From the 353 patients whose first prostate biopsy pathology was HGPIN, 100 of them underwent repeat prostate biopsy. It was found that 48% of these patients had benign (prostate tissues and prostatitis), 21% had HGPIN, 11% of them had malignancy suspected focus and 20% patients had PCA. The patients whose re-biopsy results revealed PCA 20 patients and the other 80 patients had no significant difference in age, PSA, PSA density, digital rectal examination finding and number of HGPIN focus in the first biopsy. However, in patients with positive HGPIN in >=4 quadrants PCA rate was 35% and was 17% in patients with positive HGPIN in <=3 quadrants.Conclusion: The incidence of PCA in the re- biopsies of patients in whom first biopsy results revealed HGPIN was not different from other cases. Patients with positive HGPIN in >=4 cores should be followed-up closely and evaluated for re-biopsy.

Özet

Amaç: Yüksek dereceli prostatik intraepitelyal neoplazi (YDPİN) tanısı sonrası tekrar biyopsilerde prostat adenokarsinomu (PKA) sıklığı, biyopsilerde kadran sayısındaki artışla birlikte azalma göstermiştir. YDPİN saptanan olgularda tekrar biyopsilerinde PKA çıkma olasılığı, eski literatür bilgilerinin aksine, diğer olgulardan daha yüksek değildir. Çalışmamızda ilk biyopsi sonucu YDPİN olarak gelen hastaların tekrar biyopsi sonuçlarını değerlendirdik. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2005'ten Haziran 2013'e kadar kliniğimizde prostat spesifik antijen (PSA) yüksekliği ya da parmakla rektal muayene bulgusu nedeniyle transrektal ultrasonografi eşliğinde prostat biyopsisi yapılan 2,758 hastadan patolojisi YDPİN olarak gelen 353'ü çalışmaya alındı. Hastalardan lokal anestezi altında ilk biyopside 10 kor ve ikinci biyopside ise 12 kor biyopsi örneği alındı. Bulgular: İlk prostat biyopsisi sonucu YDPİN olarak gelen 353 hastadan 100'üne tekrar prostat biyopsisi uygulandı. Bu hastaların %48'inin sonucu benign (prostat dokuları ve prostatit), %21'inin YDPİN, %11'inde malignite kuşkulu odak ve %20'sinde PKA saptandı. Tekrar biyopsi yapılan hastalardan sonucu PKA gelen 20 hasta ile diğer 80 hasta yaş, PSA, PSA dansitesi (PSAD), rektal tuşe bulgusu ve ilk biyopsideki YDPİN odak sayısı açısından karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel anlamlı sonuca ulaşılamadı. Ancak ilk biyopsisinde 4 veya daha fazla kadranda YDPİN bulunan hastaların %35'inde PKA, 3 veya daha az kadranda YDPİN bulunan hastaların ise %17'sinde PKA saptanmıştır. Sonuç: Biyopsi sonucu YDPİN olarak gelen hastalarda tekrar biyopsilerde PKA çıkma olasılığı diğer olgulardan farklı değildir. Biyopsi sonucuna göre 4 veya daha fazla kadranda YDPİN bulunan hastaların ise daha yakın takibi ve tekrar biyopsi açısından değerlendirilmeleri gerekir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ONGÜN, Ş., BOZKURT, O., ÇÖMEZ, K., DEMİR, Ö., ASLAN, G., TUNA, E. B., YÖRÜKOĞLU, K., ÇELEBİ, İ. (2016). Rebiopsy Results of the Patients in Which the First Biopsy Revealed High Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 57–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/334371

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Moore CK, Karikehalli S, Nazeer T, et al. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. J Urol 2005;173:70-72.
  2. Djavan B, Zlotta AR, Ekane S, et al. Is one set of sextant biopsies enough to rule out prostate Cancer? Influence of transition and total prostate volumes on prostate cancer yield. Eur Urol 2000;38:218-224.
  3. Bostwick DG, Montironi R. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and the origins of prostatic carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 1995;191:828-832.
  4. Gokden N, Roehl K, Catalona WJ, Humphrey PA. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsy as risk factor for detection of adenocarcinoma: current level of risk in screening population. Urology 2005;65:538-542.
  5. Bishara T, Ramnani DM, Epstein JI. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy: risk of cancer on repeat biopsy related to number of involved cores and morphologic pattern. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:629-633.
  6. Girasole CR, Cookson MS, Putzi MJ, et al. Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy. J Urol 2006;175:929-933.
  7. Epstein JI, Herawi M. Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol 2006;175:820-834.
  8. Joniau S, Goeman L, Pennings J, Van Poppel H. Prostatic Intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): importance and clinical management. Eur Urol 2005;48:379-385.
  9. Eggener SE, Roehl KA, Catalona WJ. Predictors of subsequent prostate cancer in men with a prostate specific antigen of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and an initially negative biopsy. J Urol 2005;174:500-504.
  10. Dovey Z, Corbishley CM, Kirby RS. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a risk factor for prostate cancer. Can J Urol 2005;12(Suppl 1):49-52.
  11. Moore CK, Karikehalli S, Nazeer T, et al. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. J Urol 2005;173:70-72.
  12. Gokden N, Roehl KA, Catalona WJ, Humphrey PA. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsy as risk factor for detection of adenocarcinoma: current level of risk in screening population. Urology 2005;65:538-542.
  13. Bishara T, Ramnani DM, Epstein JI. High-grade prostatic İntraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy: risk of cancer on rep