Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2016 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy-Our Initial Experiences

Transperitoneal Laparoskopik Nefrektomi-İlk Deneyimlerimiz

Pages
8–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

So, it is a preferable operation technique

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the first experiences of laparoscopic nephrectomy operations performed in our clinics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 61 laparoscopic nephrectomy operations were performed in our clinics during the period of January 2012-March 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:So, it is a preferable operation technique
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the first experiences of laparoscopic nephrectomy operations performed in our clinics. Materials and Methods: A total of 61 laparoscopic nephrectomy operations were performed in our clinics during the period of January 2012-March 2014. Patients were evaluated with their characteristics of demographic data, duration of operation, amount of bleeding, hospitalization time and complications. Results: A total of 61 patients were operated of which 37 patients were operated due to non-functioning kidney, 23 patients were suffering from renal mass and there was 1 patient with malignancy of pelvis renalis. While the mean operation time was 153 minutes in laparoscopic simple nephrectomy cases, it was 188.2 minutes in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy cases. The mean blood loss was estimated 170 mL in laparoscopic simple nephrectomy in comparison with 172.6 mL bleeding in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. A case of renal tumor was complicated with massive bleeding and the operation was continued as open surgery. Two patients with non-functioning kidney and having renal calculi complicated with postoperative bleeding after laparoscopic simple nephrectomy operation and laparotomies were performed. Blood transfusions were indicated in four cases. There were 3 cases of subileus and only one case of intraabdominal abscess. Four patients suffered from nausea and vomiting and two patients complicated with fever in postoperative period. Nine patients had grade I, 5 patients had grade II and 3 patients had grade III complications according to Modified Clavien Classification System. Conclusion: Considering laparoscopic nephrectomy the more experience gained, the less complications and the shorter hospitalization time were observed. So, it is a preferable operation technique

Özet

Amaç: Kliniğimizde yapılan ilk laparoskopik nefrektomi deneyimlerimizi retrospektif olarak değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2012-Mart 2014 tarihleri arasında 61 laparoskopik nefrektomi ameliyatı yapılmıştır. Hastalar demografik özellikler, operasyon zamanı, kan kaybı, hastanede kalış süresi, intraoperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar açısından incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Non-fonksiyone böbrek nedeniyle 37, böbrekte kitle nedeniyle 23, pelvis renalis tümörü nedeniyle 1 hasta olmak üzere toplam 61 hasta ameliyat edilmiştir. Laparoskopik basit nefrektomi olgularında ortalama ameliyat süresi 153 dakika ve laparoskopik radikal nefrektomi olgularında ortalama ameliyat süresi 188,2 dakikadır. Kanama miktarı ise laparoskopik basit nefrektomide ortalama 170 mL, laparoskopik radikal nefrektomide ise ortalama 172,6 mL'dir. Operasyon sırasında böbrek tümörlü bir hastadamajör kanama nedeniyle açığa geçildi. Non-fonksiyone taşlı böbrek nedeniyle laparoskopik basit nefrektomi yapılan 2 hastada postoperatif kanama nedeniyle laparotomi yapıldı. Dört hastaya kan transfüzyonu yapılmıştır. Postoperatif 3 hastada subileus ve 1 hastada intraabdominal apse izlendi. Postoperatif 4 hastada bulantı-kusma ve 2 hastada da ateş izlendi. Modifiye Clavien klasifikasyon sistemine göre 9 hastada sınıf I, 5 hastada sınıf II ve 3 hastada sınıf III komplikasyon izlendi. Sonuç: Laparoskopik nefrektomide deneyim arttıkça hastanede yatış süresi kısalır ve komplikasyon oranları azalır. Bu nedenle tercih edilebilir bir yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKOĞLU, A. R., COBAN, S., GUZELSOY, M., ÖZGÜNAY, T., ÖZTÜRK, M., ÜNAL, D., DEMİRBAŞ, M., DEMİRCİ, H. (2016). Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy-Our Initial Experiences. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 8–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/334362

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nefhrectomy: Initial case report. J Urol 1991;146:278-282.
  2. Nadu A, Mor Y, Chen J, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy; initial experience in Israel with 110 cases. Isr Med Assoc J 2005;7:431-434.
  3. Cicco A, Joval A, Hoznek et al. Radikal neprectomy by retroperitoneal laparoskopic app-roach versus open surgery. J Urol 1998;159:154. Wolf JS Jr, Moon TD, Nakada SY. Hand-assisted laparoscopic neprectomy; comparison to standart laparoscopic neprectomy. J Urol 1998;160:22-27.
  4. Turna B, Aron M, Gill IS. Expanding indications for laparoscopic partial nefrectomy. Urology 2008;72:481-487.
  5. Shalhav AL, Portis AJ, McDougall EM, et al. Laparoscopic neprectomy: A new standard fort the surgical management of upper tract transitionel cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2000;27:761-773.
  6. Chung JH, Lee SW, Lee KS, et al. Safety of en bloc ligation of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nefrectomy for renal cell carsinoma: A randomize contralled trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013;23:489-494. Rassweiller J. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is also oncologically safe and effective. BJU Int 2013;112:158. Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J, et al. Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical neprectomy. J Urol 2002;167:1257-1262.
  7. Steinberg AP, Finelli A, Desai MM, et al. Laparoscopic radical nefrectomy for large (greater than 7 cm, T2) renal tumors. J Urol 2004;172:2172-2176. Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for cancer. Urol Clin Nort Am 2000;27:707-719.
  8. Hemal AK, Kumar A, Kumar R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: A long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 2007;177:862-866.
  9. Abbou CC, Cicco A, Gasman D et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical neprectomy. J Urol 1999;161:1776-1780.
  10. Leclair MD, Vidal I, Suply E, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic hemi- nephrectomy in duplex kidney in infants and children: A 15-year experience. Eur Urol 2009;56:385-389.
  11. Kim C, McKay K, Docimo S. Laparoscopic nephrectomy in children: Systemic review of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. Urology 2009;73:280-284.
  12. Harano M, Eto M, Yokomizo A, et al. The efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell cancer in the elderly: An oncological outcame analysis. Int J Urol 2008;15:577-581.
  13. Lin YH, Chung HJ, Lin AT, et al. Complications of pure transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: The Taipei Veterans General Hospital Experience. J Chin Med Assoc 2007;70:481-485. Habuc