Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2016 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

The Presence and Thickness of Pseudocapsule after Partial Nephrectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Parsiyel Nefrektomi Yapılan Renal Kanser Olgularında Yalancı Kapsül Varlığı ve Kalınlığı

Pages
136–139
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that it may be a prognostic factor for RCC in the future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the presence and thickness of pseudocapsule after partial nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases.Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients who were admitted to our clinic and diagnosed with RCC were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Histopathological specimens of the patients who underwent partial nephrectomy were re-evaluated retrospectively.Results: The histopathological results revealed pseudocapsule in 87 cases (87%, median thickness: 0.708 mm).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that it may be a prognostic factor for RCC in the future.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the presence and thickness of pseudocapsule after partial nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases.Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients who were admitted to our clinic and diagnosed with RCC were included in the study. Histopathological specimens of the patients who underwent partial nephrectomy were re-evaluated retrospectively.Results: The histopathological results revealed pseudocapsule in 87 cases (87%, median thickness: 0.708 mm). Pseudocapsule median thickness was noted respectively 0.483, 0.691, 0.737, 0.954 mm in Fuhrman Grade 0, 1, 2, 3/4 groups (p<0.05).Conclusion: In this study, a statistical significance was found between nuclear grading system and the thickness of pseudocapsule in RCC. We believe that it may be a prognostic factor for RCC in the future.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada parsiyel nefrektomi yapılan renal hücreli kanser (RHK) tanısı alan olgularda psödokapsül varlığını ve kalınlığının değerlendirilmesini amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimize başvurup RHK tanısı alan 100 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Parsiyel nefrektomi yapılan bu hastaların patoloji piyesleri retrospektif olarak tekrar değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmadaki olguların 87'sinde patolojik piyeste psödokapsül saptandı (%87, ortalama kalınlığı 0,708 mm). Fuhrman çekirdek derecelendirilmesinde 0, 1, 2 ve 3/4 olan gruplarda ise bu kalınlık ortalama sırasıyla 0,483, 0,691, 0,737, 0,954 mm olarak bulundu (p<0,05). Sonuç: Bu çalışmada RHK'de çekirdek derecelendirmesi ile psödokapsülün kalınlığı arasındaki istatistiksel anlamlı ilişkiyi saptadık. Gelecekte bunun RHK'lerde önemli bir prognostik faktör olabileceğini düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

NARTER, F., TARHAN, F., ÇAMUR, E., SARIKAYA, Ş., BAŞAK, K., TUNCER, M., KÖSE, İ., ÖZGÜL, A. (2016). The Presence and Thickness of Pseudocapsule after Partial Nephrectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 136–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/334358

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Vermooten V. Indications for conservative surgery in certain renal tumors: a study based on the growth pattern of the cell carcinoma. J Urol 1950;64:200-208.
  2. Kus E, Yıldız K, Dillioglugil O. Böbrek Hücreli Karsinomda Fuhrman Çekirdek Derecesi ve Evrenin Sağ kalımla İlişkisi. Turkish Journal of Pathology 2009;25:71-77.
  3. Piper NY, Bishoff JT, Magee C, et al. Is a 1-CM margin necessary during nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma? Urology 2001;58:849-852.
  4. Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, Goldman HB. Does the size of the surgicalmargin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol 2002;167:61-64.
  5. Castilla EA, Liou LS, Abrahams NA, et al. Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2002;60:993-997.
  6. Berdjis N, Hakenberg OW, Zastrow S, et al. Impact of resection margin status after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2006;97:1208-1210.
  7. Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P, et al. Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2012;61:757-763.
  8. Permpongkosol S, Colombo JR Jr, Gill IS, Kavoussi LR. Positive surgical parenchymal margin after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: oncological outcomes. J Urol 2006;176:2401-2404.
  9. Sundaram V, Figenshau RS, Roytman TM, et al. Positive margin during partial nephrectomy: does cancer remain in the renal remnant? Urology 2011;77:1400-1403.
  10. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, et al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 2008;179:2158-2163.
  11. Ficarra V, Galfano A, Cavalleri S. Is simple enucleation a minimal partial nephrectomy responding to the EAU guidelines recommendations? Eur Urol 2009;55:1315-1318.
  12. Beare JB, McDonald JR. Involvement of the renal capsule in surgically removed hyper-nephroma; a gross and histopathologic study. J Urol 1949;61:857-861.
  13. Azhar RA, De Castro Abreu AL, Broxham E, et al. Histological analysis of the kidney tumor-parenchyma interface. J Urol 2015;193:415-422.
  14. Minervini A, Rosaria Raspollini M, Tuccio A, et al. Pathological characteristics and prognostic effect of peritumoral capsule penetration in renal cell carcinoma after tumor enucleation. Urol Oncol 2014;32:50.