Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect the Extracapsular Extension in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Pages
206–209
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Materials and Methods: Overall, 150 patients who had undergone preoperative mpMRI and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) between June 2016 and March 2018 were enrolled.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in detecting extracapsular extension (ECE) and its impact on our preoperative surgical plan.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Overall, 150 patients who had undergone preoperative mpMRI and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) between June 2016 and March 2018 were enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The high rate of detection of ECE with mpMRI prior to RALRP may guide the surgeon to decide for NVB-sparing surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in detecting extracapsular extension (ECE) and its impact on our preoperative surgical plan. Materials and Methods: Overall, 150 patients who had undergone preoperative mpMRI and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) between June 2016 and March 2018 were enrolled. The preoperative International index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score of the patients was 22 or higher. On initial assessment, the patients’ prostate specific antigen levels and digital rectal examination and pathology results of prostate biopsy specimens were evaluated to determine whether neurovascular bundle (NVB)-sparing surgery is feasible and appropriate. On the second evaluation, mpMRI results were considered in addition to the parameters included during the first evaluation to decide whether NVB-sparing surgery should be performed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 65.2 years. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of mpMRI were 89.6%, 90.2%, 81.1% and 94.8%, respectively. According to mpMRI findings, the surgical plan at the initial evaluation changed in 35 (23.3%) of the cases. Conclusion: The high rate of detection of ECE with mpMRI prior to RALRP may guide the surgeon to decide for NVB-sparing surgery.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇ, E., ERCAN, K., ÖCAL, B., GÖK, B., Canda, A. E., ATMACA, A. F. (2020). The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect the Extracapsular Extension in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 206–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/334310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Wheeler TM, Dillioglugil O, Kattan MW, et al. Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer. Hum Pathol 1998;29:856-862
  2. Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002;167:528-534
  3. Hsu CY, Joniau S, Oyen R, et al. Detection of clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer- by digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography? BJU Int 2006;98:982-985
  4. Partin AW, Kattan MW, Subong EN, et al. Combination of prostatespecific antigen, clinical stage, and gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA 1997;277:1445-1451
  5. Ohori M, Kattan MW, Koh H, et al. Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol 2004;171:1844-1849
  6. Lightfoot AJ, Su YK, Sehgal SS, et al. Positive surgical margin trends in patients with pathologic T3 prostate cancer treated with robotassisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2015;29:634-639
  7. Loeb S, Smith ND, Roehl KA, Catalona WJ. Intermediate-term potency, continence, and survival outcomes of radical prostatectomy for clinically high-risk or locally advanced prostate cancer. Urology 2007;69:1170-1175
  8. Sciarra A, Barentsz J, Bjartell A, et al. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: how they are changing the management of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2011;59:962-977
  9. Eberhardt SC, Carter S, Casalino DD, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria prostate cancer-pretreatment detection, staging, and surveillance. J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10:83-92
  10. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012;22:746-757
  11. Feng TS, Sharif-Afshar AR, Wu J, et al. Multiparametric MRI improves accuracy of clinical nomograms for predicting extracapsular extension of prostate cancer. Urology 2015;86:332-337
  12. Gaunay GS, Patel V, Shah P, et al. Multi-parametric MRI of the prostate: factors predicting extracapsular extension at the time of radical prostatectomy. Asian J Urol 2017;4:31-36
  13. Park BH, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, et al. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging in the decision to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles at robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2014;192:82-88
  14. Stabile A, Giganti F, Rosenkrantz AB, et al. Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status an