Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

The anaerobic bacteria isolated from various clinical specimens and their antibiotic susceptibilities

Klinik örneklerden izole edilen anaerob bakteriler ve antibiyotik duyarlılıkları

Pages
85–91
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most frequent anaerobic bacteria isolated from various samples were detected as Actinomyces israelii (35.9 %) and Propionibacterium acnes (23.1 %) and the most effective antimicrobials were chloramphenicol (87.2 %) and cefoxitin (66.7 %).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, anaerobic bacteria recovered from the samples which were sent to our Clinical Microbiology Laboratory between January, 2002 and December, 2002 were evaluated according to their strains, where they were isolated from and antibiotic susceptibilities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: A total of 238 samples were obtained from various clinics during the study period and anaerobic bacteria were recovered from 67 of the samples. 28 (41.8 %) of the isolated 67 anaerobic bacteria were identified as Ruminococcus productus and accepted as members of the normal flora.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most frequent anaerobic bacteria isolated from various samples were detected as Actinomyces israelii (35.9 %) and Propionibacterium acnes (23.1 %) and the most effective antimicrobials were chloramphenicol (87.2 %) and cefoxitin (66.7 %).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 · 238 samples
⚙️Variables:Bakteriler · anaerobik · Anti-bakteriyel ajanlar

Abstract

In this study, anaerobic bacteria recovered from the samples which were sent to our Clinical Microbiology Laboratory between January, 2002 and December, 2002 were evaluated according to their strains, where they were isolated from and antibiotic susceptibilities. Results: A total of 238 samples were obtained from various clinics during the study period and anaerobic bacteria were recovered from 67 of the samples. 28 (41.8 %) of the isolated 67 anaerobic bacteria were identified as Ruminococcus productus and accepted as members of the normal flora. The other 39 anaerobic bacteria were accepted as pathogens. These pathogen bacteria were isolated from samples of blood (11), abscess (10), vagina (6), peritoneal fluid (4), ear (3), pleural fluid (2), endometrium (2) and lung abscess. The isolated anaerobic bacteria were Actinomyces israelii (14), Propionibacterium acnes (9), Propionibacterium granulosum (1), Bacteroides ovatus (2), Bacteroides distasonis (2), Eubacterium rectale (1), Porphyromonas asaccharolyticus (1), Lactobacillus fermentans (2), Fusobacterium varium (I), Prevotella intermedia (2), Prevotella oralis (1), Prevotella ruminicola (2), Peptostreptococcus spp.(2). As a result of the antimicrobial susceptibility tests performed on the isolated anaerobic bacteria the resistance rates were as follows; chloramphenicol 12.8 %, cefoxitin 33.3 %, tetracycline 35.9 %, cefotaxime 38.4 %, carbenicillin 48.7 %, clindamycin 56.4 % and metronidazole 94.9 %. The most frequent anaerobic bacteria isolated from various samples were detected as Actinomyces israelii (35.9 %) and Propionibacterium acnes (23.1 %) and the most effective antimicrobials were chloramphenicol (87.2 %) and cefoxitin (66.7 %).

Özet

Bu çalışmada; 2002 yılı içerisinde Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Laboratuvarına gelen örneklerden izole edilen anaerob bakterilerin türlerine, izole edildikleri bölgelere ve antibiyotik duyarlılıklarına göre değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu süre içerisinde laboratuvarımıza anaerob kültür amacıyla toplam 238 örnek kabul edilmiş ve bu örneklerden 67 (%28.2)'sinden anaerob bakteriler izole edilmiştir. İzole edilen 67 anaerob bakterinin 28 (%41.8)'i Ruminococcus prodııctus olarak identifiye edilmiş ve flora elemanı olarak kabul edilmiştir. Kalan 39 (%58.2) suş ise patojen olarak kabul edilmiş olup bu anaerob bakteriler; kan (11), abse (10), vajen (6), periton sıvısı (4), orta kulak (3), plevral sıvı (2), endoınetrium (2), akciğer absesi (1) örneklerinden izole edilmişlerdir. İzole edilen 39 patojen anaerob bakterilerin tür dağılımında; Actinomyces israelii (14), Propionibacterium acnes (9), Propionibacterium granulosum (1), Bacteroides ovatus (2), Bacteroides distasonis (2), Eubacterium rectale (1), Porphyromonas asaccharolyticus (1), Lactobacillus fermentans (2), Fusobacterium varium (1), Prevotella intermedia (2), Prevotella oralis (1), Prevotella ruminicola (1), Peptostreptococcus spp (2) saptandı. Anaerob bakterilerin kloramfenikole %12.8, sefoksitine %33.3, tetrasikline %35.9, sefotaksime %38.4, karbenisüine %48.7, klindamisine %56.4 ve metronidazole %94.9 oranlarında direnç gösterdikleri saptandı. Bu sonuçlara göre anaerob bakteriler arasında en sık Actinomyces israelii (% 35.9) ve Propionibacterium acnes (%23.1), en duyarlı antimikrobiyaller olarak da kloramfenikol (%87.12) ve sefoksitin (%33.3) olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, H., GÜDÜCÜOĞLU, H., BAYRAM, Y., GÜLMEZ, S., KUTULAY, N., BOZKURT, E. N., BERKTAŞ, M. (2004). The anaerobic bacteria isolated from various clinical specimens and their antibiotic susceptibilities. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 85–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/334255

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Mandell GL, Bennett JL, Dolin R: Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, In: Anaerobic Bacteria: General Concepts. Edited by Finegold SM. Churchill Livingstone Inc., USA, 1995, pp:2165-2173
  2. Hiller S and Moncla BJ: Anaerobic Gram Positive Nonsporeforming Bacilli and Cocci, In: Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Edited by Balows A, Hausler Jr WJ, Herrmann KL, Isenberg HD, Shadomy HJ, 5th ed, ASM, Washington, 1991, pp:522-537
  3. Edelstein MAC: Anaerobic Gram Positive Bacilli, Anaerobic Gram Negative Bacilli and Anaerobic Cocci. In: Bailey&Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology. Edited by Baron EJ, Finegold SM, 8th ed, C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1990, pp:508- 557
  4. Bilgehan İH: Klinik Mikrobiyolojik Tanı, 3. baskı, Fakülteler Kitabevi, İzmir, 2002
  5. Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC Jr: Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, 5th ed., Lippincott Co, 1997, pp: 709-784
  6. Hentges DJ: The anaerobic microflora of the human body. Clin Infect Dis 16 (supply 4): 175- 180, 1993
  7. Dorsher CW, Rosenblatt JE, Wilson JR: Anaerobic bacteremia: Decreasing rate over a 15 year period. Rev Infect Dis 13: 633-636, 1991
  8. Finegold SM: The role of anaerobes in human infections. Scand J Infect Dis 26 (Suppl): 9-13, 1981
  9. Durmaz B: Anaerob bakterilerin izolasyon ve identifikasyonu. XXVII.Türk Mikrobiyoloji Kongresi, 7-10 Mayıs 1996, Antalya, Kongre Özet Kitabı s:104-107
  10. Ronchetto F, Azzario G, Pistono PG, Guasco C: Gangraneus and perforating appendicitis in a provincial hospital: a 48 month retrospective study. Clinical and microbiological aspects, course and postoperative morbidity. G Batteriol Immunol 83: 27-41, 1990
  11. LombardiDP, Engleberg NC: Anaerobic bacteremia:incidence, patient charecteristics and clinical significance. Am J Med 92:53-60, 1992
  12. Bahar H, Demirci M, Kahraman P, Sever Sönmez N, Mamal Torun M: Çeşitli vücüt sıvılarından infeksiyon etkeni olarak izole edilen anaerob bakteriler. XI. Türk Klinik Mikrobiyoloji ve İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları Kongresi, 30 Mart-3 Nisan 2003, İstanbul, Kongre Özet Kitabı, Poster No: P-14/04
  13. Durmaz B, Aktaş E, Altınışık N. Anaerob infeksiyon şüpheli hastalardan alınan örneklerde kültür sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. XXX. Türk Mikrobiyoloji Kongresi, 30 Eylül-5 Ekim 2002, Antalya, Kongre Özet Kitabı, Poster No: P:03-01
  14. Karademir A, Tunçkanat F, Günalp A: Rahim içi araç kullanımına bağlı olarak gelişen pelvik aktinomikoz olgularından Actinomyces türleri izolasyon