Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Surgical margin positivity: The comparison of open and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

Cerrahi sınır pozitifliği: Açık ve laparoskopik radikal nefrektomi karşılaştırılması

Pages
150–153
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: LRN represents a safe surgical option about surgical margin positivity for RCC patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Surgical removal is the gold standart treatment for renal cell carcinoma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively analayzed the data from 139 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy between January 2005 and August 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: LRN represents a safe surgical option about surgical margin positivity for RCC patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Surgical removal is the gold standart treatment for renal cell carcinoma. In recent years laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has taken the place of open radical nephrectomy. In this study we compared the surgical margin positivity between laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy performed in our clinic. Methods: We retrospectively analayzed the data from 139 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy between January 2005 and August 2009. Open radical nephrectomy was performed through a subcostal incision. Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed by use of the transperitoneal approach in all cases. Results: Ninety-four patients underwent open radical nephrectomy and 45 patients underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy . There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the patients’ demographical data and pathological specimen. The surgical margin positivity was observed in 5 of 94 cases (5.4%) at ORN group and none of the 45 cases in LRN group (p: 0.17). But this result was statistically incoherent. Conclusion: LRN represents a safe surgical option about surgical margin positivity for RCC patients.

Özet

Amaç: Renal hücreli karsinomun (RHK) altın standart tedavisi cerrahi olup son zamanlarda Laparoskopik Radikal Nefrektomi (LRN) Açık Radikal Nefrektominin (ARN) yerini almaktadır.Bu çalışmamızda kliniğimizde uygulanan LRN ile ARN'deki cerrahi sınır pozitifliğini karşılaştırdık. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çalışmada Ocak 2005-Ağustos 2009 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde RHK nedeniyle radikal nefrektomi yapılan 139 olgunun verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. ARN’de subkostal insizyon yapılarak transperitoneal yaklaşım kullanılmıştır. LRN'de transperitoneal yaklaşım uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Olguların 94’üne ARN, 45’ine LRN yapılmıştır. İki gruptaki hastaların demografik özelliklerinde ve patolojik spesimen özelliklerinde anlamlı farklılık bulunmamaktaydı. Cerrahi sınır pozitifliği ARN uygulanan 94 olgudan 5’inde (%5.3) görülürken LRN uygulanan 45 olgudan hiçbirinde cerrahi sınır pozitifliği görülmedi (p=0.17). Fakat aradaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi. Sonuç: LRN, cerrahi sınır pozitifliği yönünden RCC hastalarında güvenli bir cerrahi yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAKTAR, A. M., TAŞTEMUR, S., ÖlÇÜCÜOĞLU, E., ŞİRİN, M. E., DOĞAN, S., ODABAŞ, Ö. (2013). Surgical margin positivity: The comparison of open and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 150–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/334185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Jacqmin D, van Poppel H, Kirkali Z, Mickisch G. Renal cancer. Eur Urol 2001
  2. 39(3):361-369. 2.Lindblad P. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Surg 2004
  3. 93(2):88-96. 3.Ljungberg B, Cowan N, Hanbury DC, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, et al. EAU Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma 2012 4.Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 1991
  4. 146(2):278-282. 5.Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Merety KS, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med 1991
  5. 324(19):1370-1371. 6. Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, Heidorn C, McDougall EM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 2000
  6. 164(4):1153- 1159. 7. Chan DY, Cadeddu JA, Jarrett TW, Marshall FF, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001
  7. 166(6):2095-2099. 8. Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J, Chen C, Barrett PH, Fentie DD, et al. Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2002
  8. 167(3):1257-1262. 9. Permpongkosol S, Chan DY, Link RE, Sroka M, Allaf M, Varkarakis I, et al. Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2005
  9. 174(4):1222-1225. 10. Wille AH, Roigas J, Deger S, Tüllmann M, Türk I, Loening SA. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 2004
  10. 45(4):483-489. 11. Itano NB, Blute ML, Spotts B, Zincke H. Outcome of isolated renal cell carcinoma fossa recurrence after nephrectomy. J Urol 2000
  11. 164(2):322-325. 12. Schrodter S, Hakenberg OW, Manseck A, Leike S, Wirth MP. Outcome of surgical treatment of isolated local recurrence after radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2002
  12. 167(4):1630-1633. 13. Ljungberg B, Hanbury D.C, Kuczyk M.A, Merseburger A.S, Mulders P.F.A, Patard J-J, Sinescu I.C. Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma. European Association of Urology 2006. 14 14. Eskiçorapçi SY, Teber D, Schulze M, Atefl M, Stock C, Rassweiler JJ. Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: The New Gold Standart Surgical Treatment for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma. TSW Urol 2007
  13. Hammond L, Powell TM, Schwartz BF. Pure laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for stage T (3b) renal-cell carcinoma: more than 2-year follow-up. J Endourol 2007
  14. 21(4):408-410. 16. Wszolek MF, Wotkowicz C, Libertino JA. Surgical management of large renal tumors. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008