SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

The single input single session percutaneous nephrolithotomy experience in horseshoe kidney stone

At nalı böbrekli taşa tek seans tek giriş yapılan perkütan nefrolitotomi deneyimimiz

ERCAN ÖĞREDEN
Pages
129–132
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: A single trading single entry session percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with horseshoe kidney is a technique that can be applied safely and successfully in the treatment of renal stones.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The results of single session single entry percutaneous nephrolithotomy applied to horseshoe kidney stone were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Between May 2009 and April 2013 between the ages 25 and 57, 2 male and 1 female, with three horseshoe kidney stones, with an average size of 21.6 mm with a single login trading session underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: A single trading single entry session percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with horseshoe kidney is a technique that can be applied safely and successfully in the treatment of renal stones.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The results of single session single entry percutaneous nephrolithotomy applied to horseshoe kidney stone were evaluated. Materials and Methods: Between May 2009 and April 2013 between the ages 25 and 57, 2 male and 1 female, with three horseshoe kidney stones, with an average size of 21.6 mm with a single login trading session underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Results: The mean postoperative clinically insignificant stone free rate is evaluated as millimeter-sized 100% of the residual stone, 66.6% were evaluated for its potential as a mechanism to trigger. The mean operative time was 63 minutes and fluoroscopy time was determined as 6.6 minutes. None of the patients needed blood transfusion. None of the patients displayed post-operative fever, lung, liver or other intra-abdominal organ injury. Conclusion: A single trading single entry session percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with horseshoe kidney is a technique that can be applied safely and successfully in the treatment of renal stones.

Özet

Amaç: Atnalı böbrek taşında uygulanan tek seans tek giriş perkütan nefrolitotomi sonuçları değerlendirildi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Mayıs 2009 ile Nisan 2013 yılları arasında, yaşları 25 ile 57 arasında değişen iki erkek, bir kadın, toplam üç atnalı böbrek anomalisi ile birlikte böbrek taşı olan ve ortalama taş boyutu 21,6 mm olan hastalara tek seans tek giriş perkütan nefrolitotomi uygulandı. Bulgular: Hastaların operasyon sonrası taşsızlık oranı, milimetrik boyutta ki rezidü taş, klinik önemsiz taş olarak değerlendirildiğinde % 100, taş potansiyeli için tetikleyici bir mekanizma olarak değerlendirildiğinde % 66,6 idi. Ortalama operasyon süresi 63 ve skopi süresi 6,6 dakika olarak belirlendi. Hiç birine kan transfüzyonu ihtiyacı duyulmadı. Hastaların hiçbirisinde ameliyat sonrası ateş, akciğer, karaciğer ve diğer batın içi organ yaralanması olmadı. Sonuç: Tek seans tek giriş perkütan nefrolitotomi, atnalı böbrek anomalisi olan renal taşların tedavisinde güvenle ve başarı ile uygulanabilen bir tekniktir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖĞREDEN, E. (2014). The single input single session percutaneous nephrolithotomy experience in horseshoe kidney stone. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 129–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/334155

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Salas M, Gelet A, Martin X, Sanseverino R, Viguier JL, Dubernard JM. Horseshoe kidney: the impact of percutaneous surgery. Eur Urol 1992; 21(2):134-137
  2. Janetschek G and Kunzel KH: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys. Br J Urol 1988; 62(2):117-122
  3. Raj GV, Auge BK, Weizer AZ, Denstedt JD, Watterson JD, Beiko DT, et al. Percutaneous 4. Evans WP, Resnick MI. Horseshoe kidney and urolithiasis. J Urol 1981; 125(5):620-621
  4. Pitts WR Jr, Muecke EC. Horseshoe kidneys: a 40-year experience. J Urol 1975; 113(6):743- 746
  5. Clayman RV. Effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the management of stone-bearing horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 1998;160(5):1949
  6. Gallucci M, Vincenzoni A, Schettini M, Fortunato P, Cassanelli A, Zaccara A. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral and kidney malformations. Urol Int 2001; 66(2):61-65
  7. Fletcher EW, Kettlewell MG. Antegrade pyelography in a horseshoe kidney. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1973; 119(4):720-722
  8. Lampel A, Hohenfellner M, Schultz-Lampel D, Lazica M, Bohnen K, Thürof JW. Urolithiasis in horseshoe kidneys: therapeutic management. Urology 1996; 47(2):182-186
  9. Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ. Combined percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy and extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy for struvite 11. staghorn calculi. World J Urol 1987; 5:245-247. Yohannes P, Smith AD. The endourological management of complications associated with horseshoe kidney. J Urol 2002; 168(1):5-8
  10. Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ Jr, Barrett DM, Benson RC Jr, et al. Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases. J Urol 1985; 134(6):1077-1081
  11. Janetschek G, Kunzel KH. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys. Applied anatomy and clinical experience. Br J Urol 1988; 62(2):117-122
  12. Lampel A, Hohenfellner M, Schultz-Lampel D, Lazica M, Bohnen K, Thürof JW. Urolithiasis in horseshoe kidneys: therapeutic management. Urology 1996; 47(2):182-186
  13. Al-Otaibi K, Hosking DH. Percutaneous stone removal in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 1999; 162 (3):674-677
  14. Lingeman JE, Saw KC. Percutaneous operative procedure in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 1999; 161:371
  15. Demirkesen O, Yaycioglu O, Onal B, Kalkan M, Tansu N, Yalcin V ve ark. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones in abnormal urinary tracts: analysis of results and comparison with normal urinary tracts. J Endourol 2001; 15(7):681-685
  16. Fine JK, Pak CY, Preminger GM. Effect of me