Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

Histopathological Evaluation of Oral Cavity Lesions

Oral Kavite Lezyonlarının Histopatolojik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
310–315
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, histopathologic examination plays an important role in the planning and prognosis of patients by providing early diagnosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent histopathological examination with oral cavity lesion and interpreted the results according to the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The records of 662 patients who applied to Dermatology and Otorhinolaryngology Clinic at İstanbul Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital between January 2008 and January 2016 were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, histopathologic examination plays an important role in the planning and prognosis of patients by providing early diagnosis.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent histopathological examination with oral cavity lesion and interpreted the results according to the literature. Materials and Methods: The records of 662 patients who applied to Dermatology and Otorhinolaryngology Clinic at İstanbul Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital between January 2008 and January 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were evaluated according to age, location of lesions, frequency of lesions, benign, premalign, and malign lesion frequency. Results: The most common lesion was the lower lip (292). The first three most common lesions were benign [Irritable fibroma (120 patient, 18,12%), mucocele (98 patient, 14,8%), pyogenic granuloma (67 patient, 10,12%)]. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor. The most common was the lower lip (43, patient, 6,49%), followed by the tongue (9 patient, 1,35%). Conclusion: Oral cavity lesions are often benign. However, in patients with malignant and premalignant lesions rate it can not be underestimated. Therefore, histopathologic examination plays an important role in the planning and prognosis of patients by providing early diagnosis.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, oral kavite lezyonu ile başvuran, histopatolojik inceleme yapılan hastaları retrospektif olarak inceleyerek, sonuçları literatüre göre yorumladık. Yöntem ve Gereçler: Ocak 2008-Ocak 2016 tarihleri arasında İstanbul Bağcılar Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi'nde Dermatoloji ve Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları Kliniğine başvuran ve histopatolojik inceleme yapılan 662 hastanın kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastalar yaş, lezyonların lokalizasyonu, lezyonların görülme sıklığı, benign, premalign ve malign lezyon sıklığı kriterleri üzerinden değerlendirildi. Bulgular: En sık lezyon alt dudak yerleşimli idi (292 hasta, % 44,1). En sık görülen ilk üç lezyon benign idi [İritasyon fibromu (120 hasta, %18,12), mukosel (98 hasta, %14,8), piyojenik granülom (67hasta, %10,12)]. Skuamöz hücreli karsinom en sık görülen malign tümördü. En sık alt dudak (43 hasta, %6,49), daha sonra dil (9, %1,35) yerleşimli idi. Sonuç: Oral kavite lezyonları sıklıkla benigndir. Ancak hastalarda malign ve premalign lezyonlar da azımsanmayacak orandadır. Bu nedenle, histopatolojik inceleme yapılması erken tanıyı sağlayarak, hastaların tedavi planlanmasında ve prognozunda önemli bir rol oynamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AZAKLI, H. N., YILDIRIM, M., BELLİ, Ş., EMRE, F. K. (2017). Histopathological Evaluation of Oral Cavity Lesions. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 310–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/334006

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Modi D, Laishram RS, Sharma LD, Debnath K. Pattern of oral cavity lesions in a tertiary care hospital in Manipur, India. J Med Soc 2013; 27(3): 199-202
  2. Fierro-Garibay C, Almendros-Marqués N, BeriniAytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Prevalence of biopsied oral lesions in a Department of Oral Surgery (2007-2009). J Clin Exp Dent 2011; (3): 73-77
  3. Kashyap B, Reddy PS, Nalini P. Reactive lesions of oral cavity: a survey of 100 cases in Eluru, West Godavari district. Contemp Clin Dent 2012; 3(3): 294-297
  4. Gangane N, Chawla S, Anshu, Gupta SS, Sharma SM. Reassessment of risk factors for oral cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2007; 8(2): 243-248
  5. Iype EM, Pandey M, Mathew A, Thomas G, Sebastian P, Nair MK. Oral cancer among patients under the age of 35 years. J Postgrad Med 2001; 47(3): 171-176
  6. Pudasaini S, Barar R. Oral cavity lesions: A study of 21 cases. Journal of Pathology of Nepal 2011; l: 49-51
  7. Lumerman H, Freedman P, Kerpel S. Oral epithelial dysplasia and the development of invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 79(3): 321-329
  8. Pereira JS, Carvalho MV, Henriques AC, Queiroz Camara TH, Miguel MC, Freitas RdeA. Epidemiology and correlation of the clinicopathological features in oral epithelial dysplasia: analysis of 173 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol 2011; 15(2): 98-102.