Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

Etiologic Analysis of Recurrent Pregnancy Losses

Tekrarlayan Gebelik Kayıplarının Etiyolojik Olarak İncelenmesi

Pages
322–327
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In these cases, an evaluation should be made at an advanced level and possible causes should be revealed to prevent repetition.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Two or more consecutive loss of pregnancy prior to 20 weeks is called recurrent pregnancy loss.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We retrospectively analyzed the cases of recurrent pregnancy loss between February 2015 and May 2017, who applied to Obstetrics and Gynecology Policlinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In these cases, an evaluation should be made at an advanced level and possible causes should be revealed to prevent repetition.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Two or more consecutive loss of pregnancy prior to 20 weeks is called recurrent pregnancy loss. We reviewed the records retrospectively and analyzed the etiology of recurrent pregnancy losses in our region.Materials and Methods: This study was carried out bySaglik Bilimleri University Diyarbakir Dr. Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of recurrent pregnancy loss between February 2015 and May 2017, who applied to Obstetrics and Gynecology Policlinic. Results: The mean age, mean gravida, mean parity, and mean abortus counts of the cases were; 26.4±7.2, 4.4±1.8, 0.8±1.2 and 3.1±1.4, respectively. Only 6.7% of the cases were using cigarettes. When the etiological causes of the cases are analyzed; coagulation disorder, progesterone deficiency, chronic systemic diseases, uterine anomalies, chromosomal anomalies and unknown causes were detected 20.5%, 16.5%, 12%, 8.9%, 6.5% and 35.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Recurrent pregnancy loss is an important obstetric problem that causes emotional problems for couples and has many causes that are not yet explained in the etiology. In these cases, an evaluation should be made at an advanced level and possible causes should be revealed to prevent repetition.

Özet

Amaç: Birbirini izleyen iki ya da daha fazla 20 haftaya kadar olan gebelik kayıpları tekrarlayan gebelik kaybı olarak adlandırılır. Kliniğimiz kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelenerek bölgemizdeki tekrarlayan gebelik kayıpları etiyolojik açıdan incelenmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Diyarbakır Dr. Gazi Yaşargil Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde yapılmıştır. Şubat 2015-Mayıs 2017 yılları arasında Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum polikliniğine başvuran tekrarlayan gebelik kaybı olguları retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Olguların yaş, gravida, parite, abortus sayısı ortalaması sırasıyla; 26.4±7.2, 4.4±1.8, 0.8±1.2 ve 3.1±1.4 idi. Olguların sadece %6.7'si sigara kullanmaktaydı. Olguların etiyolojik nedenleri incelendiğinde; koagülasyon bozukluğu, progesteron eksikliği, kronik sistemik hastalıklar, uterin anomaliler, kromozomal anomaliler ve bilinmeyen nedenler sırasıyla %20.5, %16.5, %12, %8.9, %6.5 ve %35.6 saptandı. Sonuç: Tekrarlayan gebelik kaybı çiftler için duygusal sorunlara neden olan ve etiyolojisinde henüz açıklanamayan birçok nedeni bulunduran önemli bir obstetrik problemdir. Bu olgularda mutlaka ileri düzeyde değerlendirme yapılmalı ve olası nedenler ortaya çıkarılarak tekrarını önleme yoluna gidilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ANDAN, Ş. A. C. (2017). Etiologic Analysis of Recurrent Pregnancy Losses. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 322–327. https://ajindex.com/articles/333997

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Jacobs, P.A. and Hassold, T. Chromosome abnormalities: origin and etiology in abortions and livebirths. In: F. Vogel, K. Sperling (Eds.) Human genetics. SpringerVerlag, Berlin 1987; 233-244
  2. Gallot V, Nedellec S, Capmas P, Legendre G, Lejeune-Saada V, Subtil D, et al. [Early recurrent miscarriage: Evaluation and management]. [Article in French] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2014; 43(10): 812- 841
  3. Kolte AM, Bernardi LA, Christiansen OB, Quenby S, Farquharson RG, Goddijn M, et al. Terminology for pregnancy loss prior to viability: a consensus statement from the ESHRE early pregnancy special interest group. Hum Reprod 2015; 30(3): 495-498
  4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Scientific Advisory Committee, Guideline No
  5. The Investigation and treatment of couples with recurrent miscarriage. 2011. [Accessed January 10, 2017]. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk/womenshealth/clinical-guidance/investigation-andtreatmentcouples-recurrent-miscarriage-greentop5. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 1103- 1111
  6. Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ 2000; 320(7251): 1708-1712
  7. Field K, Murphy DJ. Perinatal outcomes in a subsequent pregnancy among women who have experienced recurrent miscarriage: a retrospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2015; 30(5): 1239-1245
  8. Grande M, Borrell A, Garcia-Posada R, Borobio V, Muñoz M, Creus M, et al. The effect of maternal age on chromosomal anomaly rate and spectrum in recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2012; 27(10): 3109-3117
  9. Clifford K, Rai R, Regan L. Future pregnancy outcome in unexplained recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod 1997; 12(2): 387-389
  10. Cauchi MN, Pepperell R, Kloss M, Lim D. Predictors of pregnancy success in repeated miscarriage. Am J Reprod Immunol 1991; 26(2): 72-75
  11. Lee RM, Silver RM. Recurrent pregnancy loss: summary and clinical recommendations. Semin Reprod Med 2000; 18(4): 433-440
  12. Stephenson M, Kutteh W. Evaluation and management of recurrent early pregnancy loss. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 50(1): 132-145
  13. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7(2): 161- 174
  14. HAPO Study Coope