Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 10

Effects of Foliar Urea, Potassium and Zinc Sulphate Treatments Before and After Flowering on GlutoPeak, Some Protein Quality and Farinograph Properties of Wheat

Yapraktan Üre, Potasyum Sülfat ve Çinko Sülfat Uygulamalarının Ekmeklik Buğdayın Glutopeak, Bazı Protein Kalitesi ve Farinograf Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi

Pages
1730–1742
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the obtained results, the effect of urea, potassium sulphate and zinc sulphate applications on protein quality, gluten rheology and dough rheology was found to be significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nitrogen and sulphur application has a significant effect on the quality and quantity of storage proteins of wheat which affect the bread making process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, effect of foliar applications of urea, potassium sulphate (K2SO4) and zinc sulphate heptahydrate (ZnSO4.7H2O), under field conditions at vegetative and generative periods of wheat, were investigated for their effects on protein quality (SDS sedimentation and STK-Lactic Acid values), Glutopic parameters [(PMT (s)), BM (BE), BEM (BE) and PM (BE)] and dough rheological properties [stability (min), degree of softening (BU)] of wheat.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the obtained results, the effect of urea, potassium sulphate and zinc sulphate applications on protein quality, gluten rheology and dough rheology was found to be significant.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nitrogen and sulphur application has a significant effect on the quality and quantity of storage proteins of wheat which affect the bread making process. In this study, effect of foliar applications of urea, potassium sulphate (K2SO4) and zinc sulphate heptahydrate (ZnSO4.7H2O), under field conditions at vegetative and generative periods of wheat, were investigated for their effects on protein quality (SDS sedimentation and STK-Lactic Acid values), Glutopic parameters [(PMT (s)), BM (BE), BEM (BE) and PM (BE)] and dough rheological properties [stability (min), degree of softening (BU)] of wheat. Experiments were conducted in two trial groups. In the first trial, foliar treatments of 0% (Control); 0,5% Urea; 1% Urea; 0,5% ZnSO4.7H2O; 0,5% Urea+0,5% ZnSO4.7H2O; 1% Urea+0,5% ZnSO4.7H2O; 0,5% K2SO4 and 1% K2SO4; in the second trial, 0%; 0,5% Urea+0,5% K2SO4; 0,5% Urea+1% K2SO4;1% Urea+0,5% K2SO4; 1% Urea+1% K2SO4 were performed. As a result, in the first trial, 0,5% Urea, 1% Urea+0,5% ZnSO4 and 0,5% K2SO4; in the second trial, 1% Urea+0,5% K2SO4 were found the most prominent applications. According to the obtained results, the effect of urea, potassium sulphate and zinc sulphate applications on protein quality, gluten rheology and dough rheology was found to be significant.

Özet

Azot ve kükürt uygulaması, ekmek yapım sürecini etkileyen buğdayın depo proteinlerinin kalitesi ve niceliği üzerinde önemli etkiye sahiptir. Bu çalışmada tarla koşullarında, vejetatif ve generatif dönemlerde, yapraktan üre, potasyum sülfat (K2SO4) ve çinko sülfat heptahidrat (ZnSO4.7H2O) uygulamalarının ekmeklik buğdayın protein kalitesi (SDS Sedimantasyon ve STK-Laktik Asit değerleri), GlutoPik parametreleri [PMT (s), BM (BE), BEM (BE) ve PM (BE)] ve hamur reolojik özellikleri [stabilite (dak), yumuşama derecesi (BU)] üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Denemeler iki grup halinde yürütülmüştür. İlk denemede, yapraktan yapılan uygulamalar %0 (Kontrol); %0,5 Üre; %1 Üre; %0,5 ZnSO4.7H2O; %0,5 Üre+0,5% ZnSO4.7H2O; %1 Üre+%0,5 ZnSO4.7H2O; %0,5 K2SO4 ve %1 K2SO4 şeklinde; ikinci denemede, %0; %0,5 Üre+%0,5 K2SO4; %0,5 Üre+%1 K2SO4; %1 Üre +%0,5 K2SO4; %1 Üre+%1 K2SO4 şeklinde olmuştur.Uygulamalar arasında birinci denemede; %0,5 Üre, %1 Üre+%0,5 ZnSO4 ve %0,5 K2SO4, ikinci denemede ise %1 Üre+%0,5 K2SO4 konuları tüm özellikler bir arada değerlendirildiğinde öne çıkan uygulamalar olmuştur. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre; üre, potasyum sülfat ve çinko sülfat uygulamalarının protein kalitesi, gluten reolojisi ve hamur reolojisi üzerini etkisinin oldukça önemli olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARUT, H., KARADUMAN, Y., AKIN, A., AYKANAT, S., Ezici, A. A. (2019). Effects of Foliar Urea, Potassium and Zinc Sulphate Treatments Before and After Flowering on GlutoPeak, Some Protein Quality and Farinograph Properties of Wheat. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 10, 1730–1742. https://ajindex.com/articles/332001

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Allison LE, Moodie CD. 1965. Carbonate. In: C.A. Black et al (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Agronomy 9:1379- 1400. Am. Soc. of Agron. Inc. Madison. Wisconsin. U.S.A. Anon. 2000. AACC Method 54-21. Approved Methods of Amer,can Association of Cereal Chemists. Arkley TH. 1961. Sulphur compound of soil systems.p. 1-126. Ph. D. Thesis. University of California. Berkley. USA. Aydoğan S, Akçacık G, Şahin A, Kaya M, Koç Y, Görgülü H, Ekici MN. 2012.
  2. Ekmeklik Buğday Unlarında Alveograf, Farinograf ve Miksografta Ölçülen Reolojik Özellikler Arasındaki İlişkinin Belirlenmesi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 7 (1):74-82.
  3. Barut H, Karaduman Y, Eker S. 2015. Teknolojik Kalite ve Sağlık Açısından Buğdayda Kükürtün Önemi. 2. Uluslararası Tarım, Gıda ve Gastronomi Kongresi, Kongre Kitabı. S:197-1988- 12 Nisan, 2015,
  4. Antalya, Belek. Barut H. 2019.
  5. Effects of Folıar Urea, Potassıum And Zınc Sulphate Treatments Before and After Flowerıng On Graın Yıeld, Technologıcal Qualıty And Nutrıent Concentratıons Of Wheat. Applıed Ecology and Envıronmental Research. 17(2):4325-4342. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer /1702_43254342. Blackman JA, Gill AA. 1980. A comparison of some small-scale tests for bread-making quality used in wheat breeding. Journal of Agricultural Science, 95, 29-34.
  6. Blumenthal C, Bekes F, Gras PW, Barlow EW, Wrigley CW. 1995. Identification of wheat genotypes tolerant to the effects of heat stress on grain quality. Cereal Chem. 72. 539–544. Bouyoucous GD. 1951. A recablibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanic analysis of the soil. Agronomy Journal 43:434-438. Bushuk W. 1982. Grains and Oilseeds. 3. Edition. Canadian International Grains Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba. Carson, PL. 1980. Recommended potassium test. P. 20-21. In: Recommended chemical soil test procedures for the North Central REgion. Rev. Ed. North Central. Regional Publicaton no. 221. North Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn. North Dakota State University, FArgo USA. Chandi GK, Seetharaman K. 2012. Optimization of gluten peak tester: A statistical approach. Journal of Food Quality. 35 (2012) 69-75.
  7. Colombo A, Perez GT, Ribotta PD, Leon AE. 2008. A comparative study of physicochemical testsfor quality prediction of argentine wheat flours used as corrector flours and for cookie production. Journal of Cereal Science, 48, 775e780. Doğan İS. ve Uğur T. 2004. Van ve Çevresinde yetifltirilen baz› bu€daylar›n bisküvilik kalitesi üzerine bir araflt›rma. Yüzüncü Y›l Üniversi