Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 5

Marketing Communication Tools in Food Industry: A Case Study on Cukurova Region in Turkey

Pages
1108–1116
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found out that enterprises used the marketing communication tools (sales promotion, advertisement etc.) to increase sales and reduce inventory, even if they are not mostly aware of the concept of marketing communications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to examine which level marketing communicating tools are used in the food industry in Çukurova Region, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, a survey was applied to 92 enterprises which process milk and dairy products, meat and meat products, fruit juice industry in both Adana and Mersin.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found out that enterprises used the marketing communication tools (sales promotion, advertisement etc.) to increase sales and reduce inventory, even if they are not mostly aware of the concept of marketing communications.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this study, it is aimed to examine which level marketing communicating tools are used in the food industry in Çukurova Region, Turkey. For this purpose, a survey was applied to 92 enterprises which process milk and dairy products, meat and meat products, fruit juice industry in both Adana and Mersin. Also, face to face interview was conducted to gather data from 400 consumers who were determined via simple random sampling, living in Adana province. It was found out that enterprises used the marketing communication tools (sales promotion, advertisement etc.) to increase sales and reduce inventory, even if they are not mostly aware of the concept of marketing communications. They also indicated that they do not practice marketing communication programs at all. The most used tools by the enterprises are personal sales, direct marketing, sales promotions and advertisement. Also, as a result of correlation analysis showed that there is an effect between the enterprises’ use of marketing communication tools and brand and market performance. Consumers stated that the sales promotions are the most effective marketing communication tools on their preferences not only buying food products but also changing the brands. Consumers mostly decide what to buy and which brand while they are in the market. In this case, advertisement, promotion and to the content of the product were the most important factors regarding consumers’ choices. It was found out that consumers’ gender, age, education and income levels were also effective on their preferences on buying different food products. Consumers attitude was different about marketing communication tools; such as young people mostly affected by media and primary and secondary school graduates mostly influenced by additional gifts provided free of charge with the main product.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHŞİ, N., BUDAK, D. B. (2020). Marketing Communication Tools in Food Industry: A Case Study on Cukurova Region in Turkey. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 5, 1108–1116. https://ajindex.com/articles/331892

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Anantachart S. 2004. Integrated marketing communications and market planning: their implications to brand equity building. Journal of Promotion Management, 11 (1). Babacan E, Kamanlıoğlu EB, Alemdar MY. 2008. The usage of internet in marketing communications and public relations activities: A research on travel agencies in Izmir, İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1): 5-24. Çalık M; Altunışık R; Sütütemiz N. 2013. An investigation of the relationship among integrated marketing communication (imc), brand performance and market performance. Int. Journal of Management Economics and Business, 9(19): 137-162.
  2. Duncan T, Moriarty SE. 1998. A communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62: 1-13. Durmaz M. 2001. About the marketing communication. İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1): 237-241. Ebren F. 2006. Bütünleşik pazarlama iletişiminin algılanışı ve uygulanması: reklam ajansları ve firmalar düzeyinde araştırmalar. Doktora Tezi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Antalya. Erpelit İ. 2010. Marka imajı oluşturulmasında bütünleşik pazarlama iletişimi ve halkla ilişkilerin rolü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Halkla İlişkiler ve Tanıtım Anabilim Dalı, İzmir. Esposito A. 2013. Insights about integrated marketing communication in small-and-medium-sized Italian enterprises. Business Systems Review, Volume 2- Issue 1, ISSN: 2280-3866, DOI: http://dx.medra.org /10.7350/BSR.B08.2013. GTHB. 2014.
  3. Üretim izinli firma listesi, Adana ve Mersin İl Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Müdürlüğü, Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, Ankara. İçli G. 2010. Analyzing marketing communication means according to the Turkish wine sector. Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 127-133.
  4. Jerman D, ZavrsnikB. 2013. Can marketing communications affect consumer behaviour? Economics Management Information Technology, 1(4). Keller KL. 2009. Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15:2-3, 139-155, DOI: 10.1080/13527260902757530. Keller KL. 2001. Mastering the marketing communications mix: micro and macro perspectives on integrated marketing communication programs. Journal of Marketing Management, 17:7-8, 819-847, DOI: 10.1362/026725701323366836. Korkut Öİ, Akyol A, Altaş D. 2005. The role of the integrated marketing communications’ on creating brand equity and its effects on the compan