Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 0

Usability of Antimicrobial Peptides in Poultry Nutrition

Kanatlı Hayvan Beslemede Antimikrobiyal Peptidlerin Kullanılabilirliği

Pages
174–182
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, the definition, the structures, the types, the sources of production, the application areas, the microorganisms they act on and the mechanism of action of antimicrobial peptides and information about the studies related to their use in poultry nutrition will be given.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Peptides with antimicrobial properties as an alternative to antibiotics antibiotic growth promoters in poultry nutrition have been studied in recent years.These peptides, which can be supplemented to diet or water, are effective not only against bacteria but also against fungi, viruses and parasites.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Peptides with antimicrobial properties as an alternative to antibiotics antibiotic growth promoters in poultry nutrition have been studied in recent years.These peptides, which can be supplemented to diet or water, are effective not only against bacteria but also against fungi, viruses and parasites.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, the definition, the structures, the types, the sources of production, the application areas, the microorganisms they act on and the mechanism of action of antimicrobial peptides and information about the studies related to their use in poultry nutrition will be given.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Peptides with antimicrobial properties as an alternative to antibiotics antibiotic growth promoters in poultry nutrition have been studied in recent years.These peptides, which can be supplemented to diet or water, are effective not only against bacteria but also against fungi, viruses and parasites. In this article, the definition, the structures, the types, the sources of production, the application areas, the microorganisms they act on and the mechanism of action of antimicrobial peptides and information about the studies related to their use in poultry nutrition will be given.

Özet

Kanatlı hayvan beslemede büyütme faktörü olan antibiyotiklere alternatif olarak son yıllarda antimikrobiyal özellikleri tespit edilen peptidler üzerinde çalışılmaya başlanmıştır. Yeme veya suya ilave edilebilen bu peptidler sadece bakterilere karşı değil mantarlara, virüslere ve parazitlere karşı da etkilidirler. Bu makalede antimikrobiyal peptidlerin tanımı, yapıları, çeşitleri, üretim kaynakları, uygulama alanları, etki ettikleri mikroorganizmalar, etki mekanizması ve kanatlı hayvan beslemede kullanımına ilişkin yapılmış çalışmalar hakkında bilgi verilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARICA, Ş., DÖNMEZ, Ö. (2020). Usability of Antimicrobial Peptides in Poultry Nutrition. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 0, 174–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/331869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akyar I, Rota S. 1999. Geniş spektrumlu doğal antibiyotikler: Katyonik peptidler. Flora, 4(1): 26-33.
  2. Alan AR, Blowers A, Earle ED. 2004. Expression of a magainintype antimicrobial peptide gene (MSI-99) in tomato enhances resistance to bacterial speck disease. Plant Cell Reports, 22: 388–396. Arakawa T. 2003. Chitin synthesis inhibiting antifungal a gents promote nucleopolyhedrovirus infection in silkworm, Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) larvae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 83(3): 261-263.
  3. Aşkar Ş, Aşkar TK. 2017. Antimikrobiyel proteinler ve bağışıklıktaki önemi. Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2): 82-86.
  4. Baltzer SA, Brown MH. 2011. Antimicrobial peptides-promising alternatives to conventional antibiotics. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 20(4): 228-235.
  5. Bao H, She R, Liu T, Zhang Y, Peng KS, Luo D, Zhai L. 2009. Effects of pig antibacterial peptides on growth performance and intestine mucosal immune of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 88(2): 291-297. Bradshaw JP. 2003. Catiyonic antimicrobial peptides. Bio Drugs, 17(4): 233-240.
  6. Brogden KA, Ackermann M, McCray PB, Tack BF. 2003. Antimicrobial peptides in animals and their role in host defences. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 22: 465-478. Brodgen KA. 2005. Antimicrobial peptides: pore formes or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria. Natura Reviews / Microbiology, 3: 239-250.
  7. Brogden, NK, Brogden KA. 2011. Will new generations of modified antimicrobial peptides improve their potential as pharmaceuticals. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 38(3): 217-225.
  8. Cerovsky V, Budesínsky M, Hovorka O, Cvacka J, Voburka Z, Slaninova J. 2009. Lasioglossins: three novel antimicrobial peptides from the venom of the eusocial bee Lasioglossum Laticeps (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). ChemBioChem, 10: 2089-2099.
  9. Chakrabarti A, Ganapathi TR, Mukherjee PK, Bapat VA. 2003. MSI-99, A magainin analogue, imparts enhanced disease resistance in transgenic tobacco and banana. Planta, 216(4): 587-596.
  10. Chiou PP, Lin CM, Perez L, Chen TT. 2002. Effect of cecropin b and a synthetic analogue on propagation of fish viruses in vitro. Marine Biotechnology, 4(3): 294-302.
  11. Choi SC, Ingale SL, Kim JS, Park YK, Kwon IK, Chae BJ. 2013a. Effects of dietary supplementation with an antimicrobial peptide-p5 on growth performance, nutrient retention, excreta and intestinal microflora and intestinal morphology of broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 185(1-2): 78-84.
  12. Choi SC, Ingale SL,