Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 7

Some Environmental Factors Affecting Birth Weight, Weaning Weight and Daily Live Weight Gain of Holstein Calves

Pages
617–622
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall mean of birth weights was 39.6±0.15 kg.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was conducted to determine some environmental factors affecting birth weight, weaning weight and daily live weight gain of Holstein calves of a livestock facility in Izmir, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data on 2091 calves born between the years 2005-2010 were used to assess the relevant parameters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall mean of birth weights was 39.6±0.15 kg.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2091 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine some environmental factors affecting birth weight, weaning weight and daily live weight gain of Holstein calves of a livestock facility in Izmir, Turkey. The data on 2091 calves born between the years 2005-2010 were used to assess the relevant parameters. Effects of calving year, calving month, calf gender and the interaction between calving year and calving month on calves’ birth weights were highly significant. The overall mean of birth weights was 39.6±0.15 kg. In addition, effects of calving year, calving month, gender, birth weight, weaning age, calving year x calving month, calving year x gender and calving year x calving month x gender interactions on weaning weight (WW) and daily live weight gain (DLWG) were highly significant. The overall means of WW and DLWG were respectively found to be 79.7±0.20 kg and 525±2.5 g. A one kilogram increase in birth weight resulted in an increase of 0.89 kg in weaning weight and a decrease of 1.26 g in daily live weight gain. Prenatal temperature-humidity index (THI) affected birth weight of calves (R2 =0.67). Increasing THI from 50 to 80 resulted in 3.8 kg decrease in birth weight.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAYLAK, E., ORHAN, H., DAŞKAYA, A. (2015). Some Environmental Factors Affecting Birth Weight, Weaning Weight and Daily Live Weight Gain of Holstein Calves. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 7, 617–622. https://ajindex.com/articles/331744

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akbulut Ö, Tüzemen N, Aydın R. 1993. Erzurum şartlarında Siyah Alaca sığırların verimi. 2: Doğum ağırlığı, büyüme ve yaşama gücü özellikleri. Türk Vet. Hay. Derg., 17(3): 193-200.
  2. Akbulut O, Bayram B, Yanar M. 2001. Yarı entansif şartlarda yetiştirilen Esmer ve Siyah Alaca buzağıların doğum ağırlığına ait fenotipik ve genetik parametre tahminleri. Lalahan Hay. Araşt. Derg., 41(2): 11-20.
  3. Alpan O, Arpacık R. 1998. Sığır Yetiştiriciliği. 2. Baskı,
  4. Şahin Matbaası, Ankara. Bardakçıoğlu HE. 2001. Bireysel kulübelerde barındırılan Holştayn buzağıların büyüme ve yaşama gücüne; doğum ağırlığı, cinsiyet ve doğum mevsiminin etkileri. İstanbul Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg., 27(2): 439-458.
  5. Başpınar H, Oğan M, Batmaz E S, Balcı F, Karakaş E, Baklacı C. 1998. Esmer ve Holştayn buzağıların büyüme ve yaşama gücüne etki eden bazı çevresel faktörler. Lalahan Hay. Araşt. Derg., 38(2):19-31.
  6. Bateman HG, Hill TM, Aldrich JM, Schlotter RL, Firkins, JL. 2012. Meta analysis of the effect of initial serum protein concentration and empirical prediction model for growth of neonatal Holstein calves through 8 weeks of age. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 363-369
  7. Bayrıl T, Yılmaz O. 2010. Kazova Vasfi Diren Tarım İşletmesinde yetiştirilen Siyah Alaca buzağılarda büyüme performansı ve yaşama gücü. YYU Vet Fak. Derg., 21(3): 169-173. Bazzi H. 2011. Evaluation of non-genetic factors affecting birth weight in Sistani cattle. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 10: 3095-3099.
  8. Bilgiç N, Alıç D. 2005. Siyah Alaca buzağıların doğum ağırlıklarına ait genetik ve fenotipik parametre tahminleri. Ankara Üniv. Tar. Bil. Der., 10(1):72-75.
  9. Bush RS, Nicholson JWB. 1986. The Effects of weaning schedule, duration of milk feeding and fishmeal on calf performance. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 66: 691-698.
  10. Collier RJ, Doelger SG, Head HH, Thatcher WW, Wilcows CJ. 1982. Effects of heat stress during on maternal hormone concentrations, calf birth weight and postpartum milk yield of Holstein cows. J. Anim. Sci., 54: 309-319.
  11. Düzgüneş O, Eliçin A. 1986. Hayvan Yetiştirme İlkeleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yay: 978, Ders Kitabı: 288. Ankara.
  12. Greenwood PL, Cafe LM. 2007. Prenatal and pre-weaning growth and nutrition of cattle: long-term consequences for beef production. Animal, 1:9:1283-1296.
  13. Holland MD, Odge KG. 1992. Factors affecting calf birth weight: A review. Theriogenology, 38: 769-798.
  14. Johanson JM, Berger PJ. 2003. Birth weight as a predictor of calving ease and perinatal mortality in Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 86:3745–3755. Kibler