Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

Genetic Variability of Macrophomina phaseolina Isolates from Dry Beans in Turkey

Pages
305–312
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

DNA from 20 isolates was subjected to genetic diversity analysis by the RAPD method using 14 randomly chosen 10-base random primers, and low genetic diversity (33.3%) was observed among the tested isolates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Charcoal rot is a soil and seed borne, economically important fungal disease on dry bean in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twenty bean isolates of M. phaseolina collected from different locations in Turkey during 2008 and 2012 years were studied for genetic variability using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay, chlorate sensitivity on medium supplemented with 120mM of potassium, phenotype of colony, and pathogenicity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:DNA from 20 isolates was subjected to genetic diversity analysis by the RAPD method using 14 randomly chosen 10-base random primers, and low genetic diversity (33.3%) was observed among the tested isolates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Charcoal rot is a soil and seed borne, economically important fungal disease on dry bean in Turkey. Twenty bean isolates of M. phaseolina collected from different locations in Turkey during 2008 and 2012 years were studied for genetic variability using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay, chlorate sensitivity on medium supplemented with 120mM of potassium, phenotype of colony, and pathogenicity. Isolates were identified as M. phaseolina based on morhological features and PCR assays using species-specific primers (MPKF1and MPKR1). Isolates of M. phaseolina were analysed for their aggressiveness on the susceptible bean cv. Akman 98, by soil inoculation method. Isolates exhibiting a dense chlorate phenotype were chlorateresistant, while those possessing feathery and restricted chlorate phenotypes were chlorate-sensitive. More than half of the isolates (55%) were resistant to chlorate and produced dense phenotype, while 35% isolates showed feathery and two isolates (10%) showed restricted growth. DNA from 20 isolates was subjected to genetic diversity analysis by the RAPD method using 14 randomly chosen 10-base random primers, and low genetic diversity (33.3%) was observed among the tested isolates.

🔖

Cite This Article

YEŞİL, S., BAŞTAŞ, K. K. (2016). Genetic Variability of Macrophomina phaseolina Isolates from Dry Beans in Turkey. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 305–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/331624

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abawi GS, Pastor Corrales MA. 1990. Root rots of beans in Latin America and Africa; diagnosis, research methodologies and management strategies. CIAT, Colombia. 114 p. Aboshosha SS, Atta Alla SI, El-Korany AE, El-Argawy E. 2007. Characterization Affecting Sunflower Growth in El-Behera Governorate, Egypt. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 9 (6): 807-815. phaseolina Isolates Almeida AMR., Abdelnoor RV, Arias CAA, Carvalho VP, Filho DSJ, Marin SRR, Benato LC, Pinto MC, Carvalho CGP. 2003. Genotypic diversity among Brazilian isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina revealed by RAPD. Fitopatol. Bras., 28: 279-285.
  2. Babu BK, Saxena AK, Srivastava A K, Arora DK. 2007. Identification and detection of Macrophomina phaseolina by using species-specific oligonucleotide primers and probe. Mycologia, 99:797-803.
  3. Beas-Fernandez R, De Santiago-De Santiago A, Hernandez- Delgado S, Mayek-Perez N. 2006. Characterization of Mexican and non-Mexican isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina based on morphological characteristics, pathogenicity on bean seeds and endoglucanase genes. J. Plant Pathol., 88 (1): 53-60.
  4. Cloud GL, Rupe JC. 1991. Morphological instability on a chlorate medium of isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina from soybean and sorghum. Phytopathology, 81: 892-895.
  5. Das IK, Fakrudin B, Arora DK. 2008. RAPD cluster analysis and chlorate sensitivity of some Indian isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina from sorghum and their relationships with pathogenicity. Microbiol. Res., 163: 215-224.
  6. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB. 1973. Variation among isolates of Macrophomina phaseoli (Rhizoctonia bataticola) from different regions. J. Phytopathol., 76: 200-204.
  7. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB. 1978. Biology and Pathology of Macrophomina phaseolina. O.D. Dhingra and J.B. Sinclair eds. Universidade Federal De Vicosa, Minas Gerais.166p. Doley K, Jite PK. 2014. Interaction effects of Glomus fasciculatum and Trichoderma viride inoculations on groundnut plants inoculated with pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina. IJAS, 4 (9): 281-288. Fuhlbohm M. 1997. Genotypic diversity among Austrialian isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina. XX Biennial Australian Plant Pathology Society Conference. Lincoln University, New Zeland, P.52. Guo JR, Schnieder F, Abd-Elsalam KA, Verreet JA. 2005. Rapid and efficient extraction of genomic DNA from different phytopathogenic fungi using DNAzol reagent. Biotechnol. Lett., 27: 3-6.Holliday P. 1980. Fungus Diseases of Tropical Crops. Pp. 254-255.
  8. Dover Publications, Minneola. Iqbal U, Mukhtar T, Muhammad S,