Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

The Examination of The Main Transportation Arteries of Konya In Terms of Landscape Architecture Design Criteria

Pages
380–387
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the current situation of 3 main streets of Konya used most intensely was examined in terms of landscape design criteria and some suggestions were made by attempting to identify the improvement works that should be performed by the public authorities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ensuring comfort of use and security of pedestrians, which are the main users of urban green spaces, and the determination of their needs are important since local authorities are guiding for new pedestrian zone studies in the Konya city.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because of the problems caused by the upper structure, the necessary care is not given in terms of transportation comfort, pedestrian safety, vehicle security, plant design and ergonomic / antropemetric standards.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the current situation of 3 main streets of Konya used most intensely was examined in terms of landscape design criteria and some suggestions were made by attempting to identify the improvement works that should be performed by the public authorities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Ensuring comfort of use and security of pedestrians, which are the main users of urban green spaces, and the determination of their needs are important since local authorities are guiding for new pedestrian zone studies in the Konya city. Because of the problems caused by the upper structure, the necessary care is not given in terms of transportation comfort, pedestrian safety, vehicle security, plant design and ergonomic / antropemetric standards. The pedestrian way and refuge landscape designs have an important position and amount among open green areas on the scale of Konya. However, it was identified that the applications conducted were inadequate in terms of aesthetic and functional characteristics and were not suitable for the urban landscape design principles, in general, and the standards of urban afforestation of the streets. In this study, the current situation of 3 main streets of Konya used most intensely was examined in terms of landscape design criteria and some suggestions were made by attempting to identify the improvement works that should be performed by the public authorities.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güngör, S., POLAT, A. T. (2017). The Examination of The Main Transportation Arteries of Konya In Terms of Landscape Architecture Design Criteria. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 380–387. https://ajindex.com/articles/331567

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Anonymous. 1990.
  2. Yaya Hakları Bildirgesi, İhd 1990. Web page: http://www.yayed.org/id96-incelemeler/yaya-haklari-bildirgesiihd-1990.php Anonymous. 2006. Street Landscape Standards. Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department. https://www.phoenix.gov/streetssite/ Documents/streetman.pdf [26/01/2017] Anonymous. 2016. Symptoms of potassium deficiency in plants. http://www.tarimmarketi.com/BitkilerdePotasyumEksikligi.asp x[24/12/2016] Anonymous. 2016b. Design Manual for Urban Roads and Streets. Department of Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government, Custom House, Dublin. Web page: http://www.housing.gov.ie/sites/default/files/migratedfiles/en/Publications/DevelopmentandHousing/Planning/FileDo wnLoad%2C32668%2Cen.pdf [26/01/2017] Bulut A. 1997. Kent İçi Yol Ağaçlamasının Tesis Tekniği ve Ankara Örneğinde Sorunları, Çözüm Önerileri, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
  3. Castillo-Manzano JI, Lopez-Valpuesta L, Asencio-Flores JP. 2014. Extending pedestrianization processes outside the old city center; conflict and benefits in the case of the city of Seville, Habitat International, Volume 44: 194-201, ISSN 0197-3975, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.005.
  4. Çelem H, Uslu A. 2006. Kent İçi Yol Ağaçlandırma Çalışmaları: Genel Değerlendirme. Kent İçi Ağaçlandırma Çalışmalarında Teknikler ve Sorunlar: Ankara Örneği Panel. 11 Kasım 2006. Kırsal Çevre ve Ormancılık Sorunları Araştırma Derneği. Ankara.
  5. Küçük V, Gül A. 2005. Isparta Kent İçi Yol Ağaçlandırmaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma.Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Bildirisi, Isparta. Mauliani L, Purwantiasning AW, Aqli W. 2015. Designing Better Environment by Providing Pedestrian Way for Pedestrian, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 179: 80-93, ISSN 1877-0428, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.412. Memlük MZ. 2012
  6. Urban Landscape Design, Landscape Planning, Dr. Murat Ozyavuz (Ed.), InTech, DOI: 10.5772/39015. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/landscapeplanning/urban-landscape-design [17/12/2016] Önder S. Polat AT. 2000. Yollarda Bitkisel Tasarım İlkeleri; Konya Kenti Örneği. Kentsel Yeşil Dokunun Analizi ve Bakım Esasları Semineri, Sayfa:78-92. Konya. Öztürk B. 1998. Kent İçi ve Kent Dışı Karayolu Ulaşım Sisteminde Bitkilendirmenin Trafik Tekniği Yönünden İşlevleri. EGM Trafik Hizmetleri Başkanlığı Trafik Araştırma Merkezi Müdürlüğü Araş